Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I recently had to charge my flat battery ( not using car very much at the moment) and when I attached the neg lead back to the battery (with pos obviously already connected) I accidently (and clumsily) touched the ratchet used to tighten the nut between the neg and pos terminals of the battery resulting in big spark and me jumping quite high.

The car has been used since then and everything seems normal, but my question is could there have been damage to the electrics and/or the battery?

Many thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/439770-accidentally-shorted-battery/
Share on other sites

And the ratchet would glow bright yellow and then melt before the battery went flat anyway. And in the meantime, the only effect at the ECU would have been removal of power.

The real problem you have heard about (although obviously not correctly) is reverse polarity connection. Hook up a jumper battery or car backwards and see what happens to the ECU (which may be nothing, depending on how good the RP protection is).

Edited by GTSBoy

Realistically, the welding thing is perfectly true. Or at least it used to be. And it isn't the battery terminals you need to remove. The ECU needed to be unplugged from the loom to prevent it from getting nasty zaps up through the earth connections.

More modern cars and ECUs have much better protection against this sort of thing so you can get away with it. But back when all this was new, many ECUs and other vehicle electronics were damaged by welding.

Well it shorted through my ratchet, so it should be fine, only thing would be the ECU that would be damaged if left on long enough and I would have known by now if it was wrecked. Are there any other components besides the ECU that can be damaged?

Think about it, Your shorting a battery accross the terminals. Basically you are bypassing everything between the positive and negative circuit in the battery. The only damage will be to your ratchet.

Unplugging sensitive electrics when welding is a good practice to do, in theory if you have the earth lead close to where you are welding (and provided it isnt near an ECU etc) then the chances of damaging it are minimised Because the circuit wants to take the shortest route to the earth lead. So if the earth lead is at the back of the car and you are welding on the front reo bar, you can imagine that the circuit is much more likely to join with the ECU circuit then if you have the Earth lead closer to the welding area. Having said that, I would never weld on a car without unplugging ECU's etc because its alot of current to pass through the chassis

Shorting across the battery terminals is not much different to shorting from the positive to the chassis (because the Battery negative goes to a nearby Chassis earth anyway)

The most likely thing you will damage is the battery. This is a bit more of an issue if the battery is in the boot, has been through some charging cycles and there is hydrogen gas around. Arcing the terminals can result in battery explosion. I've seen plenty of horrible photos of people messing with batteries in dump trucks/dozers where this has happened and the battery is a mangled wreck.

Summary:

Shorting battery terminals, not advisable but generally doesnt end in disaster

Welding with ECU's plugged in: No

Edited by 89CAL

Remember that some ECU's require a 5V power source for sensors and dont generally like higher voltages then that.

OHMS law proves that voltage is proportional to current. Voltage goes up, current goes up

Edited by 89CAL

Welding........much more than 12v.

And much more current then you will find in your fuse box in your car :)

Some people are lucky and get away with welding with everything still connected, but for the small amount of effort it takes to unplug stuff, its not worth the risk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks everyone for the replies and suggestions. Got the seats out (hoping I could find some existing grommets but no such luck). By tapping and measuring etc. I could figure out where I could drill through if needed. But first I borrowed an inspection camera and managed to go through factory holes in the chassis rail and could see that the captive nut was holding steady which is why it could retighten. So it was indeed a stripped section of thread, so I applied downforce by levering the bolt head with a screwdriver and went slowly back and forth until it came out. Camera helped a lot cos I could monitor that the captive nut was holding tight. Now I just have one very seized main subframe nut to tackle 馃槄
    • BOVs do have a purpose, if you ever log pressure before and after the throttle body, you will see a spike pre throttle on lift off from a WOT condition. Enough to bend throttle blades / damage e-throttle motors or simple assist in blowing off cooler pipes. FWIW, the above on really applies to those running at least 2 bar of boost. OP shouldn't have an issue, on the other hand, here are some videos of my shit box over a decade ago with some succulent dose with the airbox on and off. That shit box is unrecognisable these days 馃珷    
    • I've tried all different combinations of BOVs/ no BOV and stock bypass valves over the years, on gear changes the stock bypass valve seems to get the car back on boost quicker because in part the turbos wheel speed isn't being slowed down by reversion, although they have issues holding boost much over the stock setting. Most aftermarket BOVs you can adjust the spring, tighter will make it open later and close sooner, but in my experience it'll cause a bit of flutter at low load/rpm anyway. I've also got some input into this whole no bov causing turbo wear, never had an issue on any on my turbos HOWEVER, I got my R33 GTST with 200k kms on it, with from what I can see still has the original turbo, no lateral shaft play but has about 4-5mm of play in and out which to me seems like a worn thrust bearing from years (100-150k kms?) of turbo flutter running no bov, so maybe there is some truth to it in the long run. But that'll never stop me loving the Stutututu while I have the car.   OP just wants to know if he can run a atmo vented BOV with no major issues and the answer is YES, plenty of people do it, there's no harm in installing it and seeing how it runs before spending $$$ on an aftermarket ecu, last time I bought a Nistune it was $2400 for install and a tune , unsure of todays prices but you get me. Crazy money to spend just to fix the minor inconvenience of stalling that can be overcome by letting the revs come down to near idle before putting the clutch in or a little bit of throttle to avoid it. You're better off leaving the ecu and tune for after a bigger turbo/injectors have been installed to take full advantage of the tune and get your moneys worth.   Let OP have his Whoosh sound without trying to break his bank haha
    • I see you missed the rest of the conversation where they have benefits, but nothing to do with avoiding breaking turbos, which is what the aftermarket BOV made all the fan boys, tuners, and modders believe was the only purpose for them...
    • But they do so for the other reasons to have a compressor bypass. It's in the name.
  • Create New...