Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all, just wondering if anyone has ever changed the flange on an old HKS RB20/25 low mount manifold I've got one with a T3 divided flange but I want to run a turbo with a T4 divided inlet flange.

Does anyone know if it’s possible or advisable to weld a T4 divided flange onto these manifolds?

Or is it easier to just sell the manifold and get a whole new manifold such as a 6boost?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/440041-hks-low-mount-flange-change/
Share on other sites

Ive done pretty much that to an rb30 manifold years ago. As it is cast, it needs to be welded correctly or it will crack later (preheat, controlled cooling etc)

If you take it to a reputable welder it would be no worries. And not cost much.

Does it matter if the flange couldn't be ported out all the way to the full T4 size? Does it need to perfectly match the turbine inlet or do I lose much if it doesn't?

Just asking cos I think the edges of the openings would come closer to overlapping the existing T3 stud holes if they're ported out to the full T4 size.

If the manifold port is smaller than the exhaust housing inlet, provided it's not massively smaller it will still be OK. It's called an anti-reversion step (when it it occurs at the head face!) What it will do is locally make the gas speed higher with a small region or turbulence downstream the step, but it shouldn't be too ugly and should cost you power unless you are trying to work the turbo all the way up to the limit of what the exhaust housing can flow.

Agreed, 6boost actually makes this into his T3 flange design to improve the gas speed into the turbo, apparently keeps the response loss to a minimum. It's still a much larger opening than the nozzle of the turbo, so it won't be much of a restriction.

If the manifold port is smaller than the exhaust housing inlet, provided it's not massively smaller, it will still be OK. It's called an anti-reversion step (when it it occurs at the head face!). What it will do is locally make the gas speed higher with a small region of turbulence downstream the step, but it shouldn't be too ugly and shouldn't cost you power unless you are trying to work the turbo all the way up to the limit of what the exhaust housing can flow.

Good grief. Just read my post which can't be edited now and saw all the typos that I hate from other people in it. So I fixed them here so I don't look like an illiterate moron.

Most of the old HKS cast low mount mani's I've had or seen were all T4 flange, and have had the T3 bolt pattern drilled and tapped into the flange face... there is f-all difference in the actual 'hole' between T3 and T4... nothing that can't be sorted out with a die grinder anyway.

So if you have a manifold with a T3 flange (is it cracked?), I can't see why you wouldn't be able to drill and tap a T4 flange bolt hols into it.

OR... swap it for one with a T4 flange already?

... The other thing is that some turbo's just don't fitt on this manifold on and engine with the engine mounts on. I doubt the big ass comp housing on the BW turbo's will fit.

Just out of interest, is it cracked through the divider? every manifold I have seen is or has been cracked.

I don't think there's any way to hide a turbo of that size so probably not worthwhile worrying about a manifold that looks even vaguely "production" .

If you can live with a less exotic but more compact dryer Garrett do T4 TS turbine housings for the smaller and medium sized GT BB turbos .

Might want to dummy it up first. I've had a HKS low mount manifold that came with a TA45 turbocharger. its a tight fit, only few mms from hitting the engine mount. If that is the case then you might want to change the turbine housing's entry flange then bolting on an adaptor in between.

The divider doesn't look like it's cracked.

Is the fitment issue because of height or width?

GTSBoy, thanks - so a lip of 2 - 3 mm would be ok?

2-3mm is probably alright at the lower end of that range and getting a bit excessive at the upper end of the range. If you apply a little die grinder action you can improve that most of the way around.

If you're worried about the old T3 stud holes, then perhaps you could/should weld them up when getting the T4 holes put in. If you didn't want to do that, you just don't die grind too close to those and open up the majority of the rest of the ports to remove some of the lip.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • We are literally just kids stuck in an adult's body with bills and mortgages to pay 🥲
    • Behrman is great quality stuff. My 34 has some serious clouding as well but I’m too nervous to try and replace the glass myself so I haven’t bought them yet. 
    • This might be true if you live in NZ but I can't see how this could be true for us locals here.  I've found the customer support for Haltech to be absolutely amazing. I've turned up to Haltech and spent entire days with their tech support guys, they've even helped me with wiring dramas that had nothing to do with their products.  They have the best customer support of any company I've dealt with, I can't imagine how my experiences with them could possibly be any better.
    • If you want to do a single throttle body conversion easily, you won't need to pull anything apart. Take the linkage from your throttle off the linkage controlling the ITBs. Now open the ITBs wide open, and lock the linkages in said position. Now add a single throttle body onto the front of your inlet plenum. No it's not ideal for the last nth of a kw, but it'll be a lot better than what you're already trying to do...   PS, ITBs can be so damn hard to tune from, because roughly 20% movement in a throttle body equates to a change in roughly 80% of its flow (Hence power). When you add up the flow limitations of those small throttle bodys, it is a LOT higher than that of a single large throttle. Hence, TPS is very very sensitive with them, and you do a LOT of work with sensor fusion, and some Maths behind the scenes to make those blends nice, and be smooth.
    • Yep, when Haltech purchased Adaptronic, and all of the Adaptronic staff, including Andy went with it, it took Haltech to the next level. Haltech wanted Adaptronic as they wanted things like Andy's fuel models, and some other IP, AND they wanted Andy too as he is brilliant! Andy has spoken about the incompatibilities between the old 1500 stuff vs Nexxus, and it totally makes sense. It's not JUST software that is different, there is huge changes in the underlying hardware too. It's why Haltech has had soooo many changes in the last couple of years, in terms of Hardware, and Software, and why it has become so damn Amazing. Why do you think guys like Rob Dahm with his quad rotor, went from running Adaptronic's to running Haltechs? Andy. Pretty much, Haltech these days, is Adaptronic, but with more funds behind it, and more staff, and hence Andy's visions, and visions of other people that he helps shape their great visions, into amazing new products. All the new Nexxus gear, whole new software for it, new and better dashboards, the apps that will run on headunits and NOT be slow to respond! I understand people being burnt in the past, but if you're ragging on a company, about products and issues from many years ago, it's more a reflection on yourself, not looking or keeping up with new stuff. In which case, those people should be going back to PowerFC and Nistunes as the ECU's to rave on about...
×
×
  • Create New...