Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all, just wondering if anyone has ever changed the flange on an old HKS RB20/25 low mount manifold I've got one with a T3 divided flange but I want to run a turbo with a T4 divided inlet flange.

Does anyone know if it’s possible or advisable to weld a T4 divided flange onto these manifolds?

Or is it easier to just sell the manifold and get a whole new manifold such as a 6boost?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/440041-hks-low-mount-flange-change/
Share on other sites

Ive done pretty much that to an rb30 manifold years ago. As it is cast, it needs to be welded correctly or it will crack later (preheat, controlled cooling etc)

If you take it to a reputable welder it would be no worries. And not cost much.

Does it matter if the flange couldn't be ported out all the way to the full T4 size? Does it need to perfectly match the turbine inlet or do I lose much if it doesn't?

Just asking cos I think the edges of the openings would come closer to overlapping the existing T3 stud holes if they're ported out to the full T4 size.

If the manifold port is smaller than the exhaust housing inlet, provided it's not massively smaller it will still be OK. It's called an anti-reversion step (when it it occurs at the head face!) What it will do is locally make the gas speed higher with a small region or turbulence downstream the step, but it shouldn't be too ugly and should cost you power unless you are trying to work the turbo all the way up to the limit of what the exhaust housing can flow.

Agreed, 6boost actually makes this into his T3 flange design to improve the gas speed into the turbo, apparently keeps the response loss to a minimum. It's still a much larger opening than the nozzle of the turbo, so it won't be much of a restriction.

If the manifold port is smaller than the exhaust housing inlet, provided it's not massively smaller, it will still be OK. It's called an anti-reversion step (when it it occurs at the head face!). What it will do is locally make the gas speed higher with a small region of turbulence downstream the step, but it shouldn't be too ugly and shouldn't cost you power unless you are trying to work the turbo all the way up to the limit of what the exhaust housing can flow.

Good grief. Just read my post which can't be edited now and saw all the typos that I hate from other people in it. So I fixed them here so I don't look like an illiterate moron.

Most of the old HKS cast low mount mani's I've had or seen were all T4 flange, and have had the T3 bolt pattern drilled and tapped into the flange face... there is f-all difference in the actual 'hole' between T3 and T4... nothing that can't be sorted out with a die grinder anyway.

So if you have a manifold with a T3 flange (is it cracked?), I can't see why you wouldn't be able to drill and tap a T4 flange bolt hols into it.

OR... swap it for one with a T4 flange already?

... The other thing is that some turbo's just don't fitt on this manifold on and engine with the engine mounts on. I doubt the big ass comp housing on the BW turbo's will fit.

Just out of interest, is it cracked through the divider? every manifold I have seen is or has been cracked.

I don't think there's any way to hide a turbo of that size so probably not worthwhile worrying about a manifold that looks even vaguely "production" .

If you can live with a less exotic but more compact dryer Garrett do T4 TS turbine housings for the smaller and medium sized GT BB turbos .

Might want to dummy it up first. I've had a HKS low mount manifold that came with a TA45 turbocharger. its a tight fit, only few mms from hitting the engine mount. If that is the case then you might want to change the turbine housing's entry flange then bolting on an adaptor in between.

The divider doesn't look like it's cracked.

Is the fitment issue because of height or width?

GTSBoy, thanks - so a lip of 2 - 3 mm would be ok?

2-3mm is probably alright at the lower end of that range and getting a bit excessive at the upper end of the range. If you apply a little die grinder action you can improve that most of the way around.

If you're worried about the old T3 stud holes, then perhaps you could/should weld them up when getting the T4 holes put in. If you didn't want to do that, you just don't die grind too close to those and open up the majority of the rest of the ports to remove some of the lip.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 😃
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
    • You talking about the ones in the photo above? I guess that could make sense. Fixed (but flexible) line from the point up above down to the hubcap thingo, with a rotating air seal thingo. Then fixed (but also still likely flexible) line from the "other side" of the transfer in the hub cap thingo up to the valve stem on the rim. A horrible cludge, but something that could be done. I'd bet on the Unimog version being fed through from the back, as part of the axle assembly, without the need for the vulnerable lines out to the sides. It's amazing what you can do when you have an idea that is not quite impossible. Nearly impossible, but not quite.
×
×
  • Create New...