Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Exhaust finally fitted today and looks good from underneath . Consists of 3.5 dump to 3.5" 200 cell XForce metal cat which tapers to 3" for the cup joint and the rest of the system . They used the largest longest straight through mufflers that physically fitted - the rear one is 20" long . The outlet is a straight section of polished 3" stainless tube .

I asked for quiet and that's what I got , if anything it's a little too quiet and I didn't previously think that was possible with straight through 3" mufflers .

If you can remember what a factory std VL NA sounded like it's a little louder than that .

The old exhaust is a HKS one and available if anyone wants a cheapy . The ceramic cat is in good nick internally with its matrix very clean at the temp sensor end .

I'm interested to see if mixtures and consumption changes much , also turbo transients .

A .

Went for a quick spin down to the Burg on the Princes Hwy last night and it's easier to live with noise wise , could easily drive for long distances now .

The turbo transients are a bit better and the engine "comes alive" a bit more in the 2800 plus area . What is showing up is how sensitive it is to fuel mixtures at part throttle as it climbs onto boost , if its out it's not terrible but it loses a bit of torque just at the transition point . It's this that makes me think sometimes that MAF systems could be better than MAP sensed ones because the difference in air flow may give a bit more tuning sensitivity than a MAP sensor reading relatively slow pressure changes .

Also I'm using manifold pressure for accel enrichment ATM and may have to go back to TP , neither is perfect .

Photo wise there isn't much to see , I think the ovals are Redbacks and the rear is the largest they do in 3" from memory . You might find it a bit too quiet for your liking .

I have to see Kirawee Mufflers this morning , real easy to find . If you know where Just Jap is walk down to the roundabout and look across to the left on the other side of the road can't miss it .

A .

Went for a quick spin down to the Burg on the Princes Hwy last night and it's easier to live with noise wise , could easily drive for long distances now .

The turbo transients are a bit better and the engine "comes alive" a bit more in the 2800 plus area . What is showing up is how sensitive it is to fuel mixtures at part throttle as it climbs onto boost , if its out it's not terrible but it loses a bit of torque just at the transition point . It's this that makes me think sometimes that MAF systems could be better than MAP sensed ones because the difference in air flow may give a bit more tuning sensitivity than a MAP sensor reading relatively slow pressure changes .

Also I'm using manifold pressure for accel enrichment ATM and may have to go back to TP , neither is perfect .

Out of interest targetting AFR wise in that area? And how are you sure it's not timing that is partly to blame for the softness? There are all kinds of ways of going about the whole transient throttle tuning to get it right though, definitely where the "art" is to tuning I reckon - making good power reliably is a bare minimum.

What is left on the to do list before it hits the dyno? And are you going to have a comparison with the GT-RS?

EV14 injectors hopefully in a GTt fuel rail but spending a bit quick ATM , Lancers up for rego soon and we get bitten pretty badly for that in Sydney .

I didn't get a graph for the GTRS tune and a fair bit changed since then , everything after the AFM to behind the cat grew and what's behind that flows better and is quiet .

As predicted , ATM anyway , there is no comparison between the GTRS and the GT30 but that's not to say that the 30 is a laggy pig . Obviously taking some restrictions out of the system that weren't so obvious with the GT28 has helped overall and it would have been interesting to see how it would have been with a better exhaust .

These 3076Rs are interesting at this point because they make an RB25 a more evenly rounded package even though they don't stick much boost it till a little before 3000 revs . I understand why people see them as being progressive over the rev rage where smaller turbos snap on and get things out of shape . I suppose if you drove around with your foot buried all the time these force you to wait a bit till they get cracking , don't think you'd get away with that for too long in these parts .

My current impression is that's it's still boarder line a smidge big but not by much , if you get my meaning not really laggy but a little more shove a little lower down would be good . Don't want to open old sores but this is where a slightly lighter slightly smaller trim turbine would have paid off . The GT28 turbine was a little small where the GT30 84T is a little big and Garrett don't want to give us the lighter smaller trim 60mm NS111 turbine .

Scott hinted these injectors aren't exactly high tech but that's because I'm fussy about fuel transients at small pulse widths . Fine for most people particularly with ethanol but when you want it virtually like factory or better they fall a little short . I think why the EV14s do better is because the moving parts are shorter and lighter than earlier designs and this makes them easier to control at small pulse widths .

These 3076Rs are interesting at this point because they make an RB25 a more evenly rounded package even though they don't stick much boost it till a little before 3000 revs . I understand why people see them as being progressive over the rev rage where smaller turbos snap on and get things out of shape . I suppose if you drove around with your foot buried all the time these force you to wait a bit till they get cracking , don't think you'd get away with that for too long in these parts .

My current impression is that's it's still boarder line a smidge big but not by much , if you get my meaning not really laggy but a little more shove a little lower down would be good . Don't want to open old sores but this is where a slightly lighter slightly smaller trim turbine would have paid off . The GT28 turbine was a little small where the GT30 84T is a little big and Garrett don't want to give us the lighter smaller trim 60mm NS111 turbine .

Scott hinted these injectors aren't exactly high tech but that's because I'm fussy about fuel transients at small pulse widths . Fine for most people particularly with ethanol but when you want it virtually like factory or better they fall a little short . I think why the EV14s do better is because the moving parts are shorter and lighter than earlier designs and this makes them easier to control at small pulse widths .

Yep well familiar with the injector design stuff, including fussiness - I love the Bosch injectors.

I think you misinterpret some of the disagreements stuff we had on the turbo side of things still, but nonetheless it sounds like we are actually on more of a same page than you realise - I never said these things were magic at low low rpm, but they are also more streetable then you seemed to think they would be. I dislike the .63a/r housing for higher flow but at the same time I always thought a 0.82 would be a bit big for your liking, the likes of a 0.73 would probably be closer to the right kind of cup of tea for your tastes and would probably change the character just that little bit. What you are experiencing now will be probably close to as good as you are going to get, I hope it's liveable or proves justifiable when you get a full power tune and get to explore the full rev range and how the checks and balances land. Have you actually had it WOT with a bit of boost yet?

Wait until he does, and has first hand experience how well it works, and over how wide a range.

Previous post suggests its a slow process of expanding the rpm/load envelope but he's getting the picture... :yes:

Yep totally agree on the 0.73 housing , HKS did them in T2 flange but no IWG .

I don't hate it fellas it's just that driving in built up areas with mostly 50-70 km/h limits means getting around at sub 2800 revs much of the time .

No I don't wind this thing up much because it isn't properly tuned for the 50 50 E42 splash blend it runs , if the injectors allowed it I'd probably run straight 98 pulp because it gets better at low revs and part throttle the higher the petrol content gets . I've been down to about E25 but at real low revs and pulse widths around 1-1.5ms you lose mixture control and have to raise the idle to ~ 1000 revs . This thing should be able to idle at 650-700 on PULP and with better injectors I think it will , the ViPec tries hard but the squirters get sleepy .

Good injectors and tuning will get the best out of this turbo , hopefully best will be good enough in the rev ranges it spends most of its time .

A .

Running a auto-spec diff 4.363 ratio will claw back a large proportion of any drop in low-speed response when driving in built up areas in the higher gears. Make the car a better thing in most ways except possibly a steady 110km/h motorway cruise.

No need or desire to run the thing in 2nd gear.

I gather the standard air box and snork , with a dormant Z32 , wouldn't make any difference up to 300 wheel wasps ? Intake is Scottys 80mm with a silicon step up to 100 at the comp housing .

Will have a look at the timing map today to see where its at in the boost threshold area . Is anyone running a similar setup prepared to give some ballpark timing numbers in the 0-10 pounds boost 2500-3500 rev area ?

A .

Sure, here's mine - not the same turbo, however very similar in many ways.

1.2 bar of boost in 4th at 3800-ish rpm - timing map is for 98 RON and with knock monitoring I can't hear anything. However this is consider very mild timing as I punched these in before the track day and only have touched it up here and there.

post-22311-0-99266500-1397783575_thumb.png

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...