Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

timing should not be tapering down with increase in rpm..should do opposite.. more advance with rpm.

you may need to pipe the timing down bit to start then ramp it in.

Prior to getting it tuned I had a look at other RB maps and i was also wondering myself why the decrease. I have taken -2 deg off rows 14-15 in the 4000-6000 rpm range.

Will get the tune re-done shorlty

... this is closer to being the main reason ...

I did wonder why this is? is that because the duration between each compression stroke is effectively shorter?

... than this is ....

torque drops off, less cylinder pressure so you effectively can dial in more timing

Though they both have an influence. This isn't a stab, I just think that if you are tuning your own car or dishing out advice it's worth understanding the fundamentals a bit better yourself... ponder on it. Not that I know anything, I'm one of many who have been put in their place for thinking they have a clue which might be worth sharing to help people get good results.

I guess my next question is. Currently along rows N16-N20 in the Load areas L14/L15. Timing is already around the 20-22 degree mark. Whilst some are saying that it should increase as RPM closes out to max, I should not increase this anymore, but rather decrease along the 4000-6400 rpm band where MBT is.

Would it be a silly move to increase timing in N16-N20 even if knock stays the same? Would I see any advantage or am I already at the potential limit of this particular tune?

Though they both have an influence. This isn't a stab, I just think that if you are tuning your own car or dishing out advice it's worth understanding the fundamentals a bit better yourself... ponder on it. Not that I know anything, I'm one of many who have been put in their place for thinking they have a clue which might be worth sharing to help people get good results.

Point taken on board, I actually tune my own cars and also my mate's cars. I have access to a dyno however do the bulk of my tuning on roads late at night.

However in the past instead of getting constructive criticism (which I always welcome) I get responses like "good luck blowing up your motor" OR "take it to a tuner" etc.. hence the jaded and cynically response.

If you compare us to forums like evolutionm.net where people openly share maps and talk about tuning, we are living under rocks.

I guess my next question is. Currently along rows N16-N20 in the Load areas L14/L15. Timing is already around the 20-22 degree mark. Whilst some are saying that it should increase as RPM closes out to max, I should not increase this anymore, but rather decrease along the 4000-6400 rpm band where MBT is.

Look at your dyno graph and plot out where the torque peaks and beings to decay but yes you're on the right track. perhaps the range 4000 to 6400 is quite excessive, I won't tell you what exactly to do..

also keep an eye on EGTs.. don't drop timing too much

Ok.

So assuming the Dyno run was done in 4th gear, max torque appears to be at around road speed 125-130kph, which would equate to around 4600 rpm and then starts to fall.

So assuming in this Load area, I reduce the timing to around 20deg, the remainder of the timing map should be equal to or higher than 20 deg (if knock is not reading higher, and EGT's remain the same)

post-74132-0-53537800-1394595806_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi again all, I’ve tried doing some searching on the topic but couldn’t find the answer I’m looking for.   I deleted my clutch booster because it had an air leak and was squealing like a hog, and now my clutch has very poor pedal feel and the friction zone is way too small, so I believe I need a bigger diameter clutch master cylinder to compensate for not using the booster. I found a Wilwood option that’s 3/4” for a good price and will fit my 3AN clutch line, but all the firewall adapters I see online such as RB factory or Chase Bays are listed as RWD only (GTST/GTS). Link below. https://rbfactory.shop/products/nissan-to-wilwood-girling-clutch-master-cylinder-adapter My question is if these adapters will also fit a GTR, and if anyone has experience using a 3/4” CMC without the booster, my clutch is a Nismo coppermix twin plate.   Thanks, always appreciate the advice!
    • Catching up on a post, I've replaced the external shark fin with a small 4g antenna (no further drilling, just a 1mm embiggening of the existing hole, and run that to where the dual battery models have the battery in the left rear guard.  No idea what the factory antenna did, but removing it had no impact on anything I use, according to the US manual the GPS antenna is in the dash and it still works fine Also ended up stealing battery power from one of the amps and ACC power from a unit nearby to add an ACC relay to power it. The mounted the booster, wifi, power socket and antenna splitter in the rear left guard out of the way, all out of site with the boot trims in
    • What drama? The only drama you're going to have is the near constant work to maintain all those sphericals. I only have sphericals in my front caster rods and front upper CAs (because both of these are near compulsory in an R32). I have had the front arms out of my car 34 times already this month, and if the new replacements arrive today, I will have them out and apart again tomorrow. Chasing clicking and clunking that comes from sphericals being a.....poor choice for a road car. Moisture and dirt are not their friends. I have been contemplating a change to my rear subframe that would require me to use sphericals in my lower CAs. And.....I don't want to have them that close to the road.
    • Did you need anything else you've already done? If you had it before... and liked the changes after, then supposedly it'd be more of the same. The idea about most suspension arms is to tune geometry that the OEM arms max out at/can't handle because they weren't designed to have the car setup in such a way that 'looks good'.
    • I have replaced everything on my r34 including suspension to Miester R, all rear subframe bushes to poly, all arms to metal adjustable and same in front.   only thing I haven't touched is the front lower control arm. Should I? what improvement can i expect ? I mean the one on the link below?   Car drives perfectly, it is just me thinking everything is either puly bush or hard bearing type so should also do lower control arm front but do I really need it ? https://www.japspeed.co.uk/product/suspension/adjustable-arms/nissan-200sx-s13-s14-s15-skyline-r32-r33-r34-adjustable-suspension-front-lower-control-arms/?gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiAo5u6BhDJARIsAAVoDWs5V_PauQPf0kx3zFCaA4tOC9Q7JSIsfJWma_jAPN2f1sJA686djOwaAidgEALw_wcB
×
×
  • Create New...