Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

timing should not be tapering down with increase in rpm..should do opposite.. more advance with rpm.

you may need to pipe the timing down bit to start then ramp it in.

Prior to getting it tuned I had a look at other RB maps and i was also wondering myself why the decrease. I have taken -2 deg off rows 14-15 in the 4000-6000 rpm range.

Will get the tune re-done shorlty

... this is closer to being the main reason ...

I did wonder why this is? is that because the duration between each compression stroke is effectively shorter?

... than this is ....

torque drops off, less cylinder pressure so you effectively can dial in more timing

Though they both have an influence. This isn't a stab, I just think that if you are tuning your own car or dishing out advice it's worth understanding the fundamentals a bit better yourself... ponder on it. Not that I know anything, I'm one of many who have been put in their place for thinking they have a clue which might be worth sharing to help people get good results.

I guess my next question is. Currently along rows N16-N20 in the Load areas L14/L15. Timing is already around the 20-22 degree mark. Whilst some are saying that it should increase as RPM closes out to max, I should not increase this anymore, but rather decrease along the 4000-6400 rpm band where MBT is.

Would it be a silly move to increase timing in N16-N20 even if knock stays the same? Would I see any advantage or am I already at the potential limit of this particular tune?

Though they both have an influence. This isn't a stab, I just think that if you are tuning your own car or dishing out advice it's worth understanding the fundamentals a bit better yourself... ponder on it. Not that I know anything, I'm one of many who have been put in their place for thinking they have a clue which might be worth sharing to help people get good results.

Point taken on board, I actually tune my own cars and also my mate's cars. I have access to a dyno however do the bulk of my tuning on roads late at night.

However in the past instead of getting constructive criticism (which I always welcome) I get responses like "good luck blowing up your motor" OR "take it to a tuner" etc.. hence the jaded and cynically response.

If you compare us to forums like evolutionm.net where people openly share maps and talk about tuning, we are living under rocks.

I guess my next question is. Currently along rows N16-N20 in the Load areas L14/L15. Timing is already around the 20-22 degree mark. Whilst some are saying that it should increase as RPM closes out to max, I should not increase this anymore, but rather decrease along the 4000-6400 rpm band where MBT is.

Look at your dyno graph and plot out where the torque peaks and beings to decay but yes you're on the right track. perhaps the range 4000 to 6400 is quite excessive, I won't tell you what exactly to do..

also keep an eye on EGTs.. don't drop timing too much

Ok.

So assuming the Dyno run was done in 4th gear, max torque appears to be at around road speed 125-130kph, which would equate to around 4600 rpm and then starts to fall.

So assuming in this Load area, I reduce the timing to around 20deg, the remainder of the timing map should be equal to or higher than 20 deg (if knock is not reading higher, and EGT's remain the same)

post-74132-0-53537800-1394595806_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As strange as this sounds (as they are fixed back), my Bride Xero CS seats are the most comfortable seats I've used.  I vote go genuine.  The only downside I've found is on very long drives, you can't reposition your body while driving. So even though its comfy, being locked in the same position eventually becomes uncomfortable. I find myself stopping every 3 or so hours to stretch my legs on long drives. 
    • You don't have to be bored driving a Camry. Not based on the way that a couple of f**king Ubereats/Didi/othersortofmethaddlednightshiftattheservicestationrecentimmmigrants were piloting them on the way to work this morning. f**k me dead!
    • FWIW, the Bride reps are really nice to sit in. The only complaint I have, other than the tear in my bolster, is that the velcro used to hold the backrest cushion in place, up under the headrest, is a little obvious and intrusive and could probably be done better. I don't know if that is a "feature" on the genuine ones also though. I haven't looked at a genuine one like the ones I have, only some of the older models. The other thing is, even though I bought the CF ones, I think the CF is really just decorative, over the top of the same FG as the normal seats. And so they really aren't light. Between the solidly built CF/FG seat, the steel frame in the recliner mechanism, and the solid-arse seat rail, they are probably heavier than even the stock seat. They are a serious lift to get in and out of the car.
    • Yes, and so the barest minimum power target is the one that makes the most sense. Massive power is fun, but you can only use it for 1.5s at a time, and only every now and then. Medium power levels allow you to enjoy the car far more often and for longer. 500 engine HP is just below 300 rwkW which is about the maximum that is sensible for any street car really. And for a 2.6L six, it will still leave you with a decent boost response and some sort of linearity of power delivery. As you get up towards 400rwkW the onset of power tends to be increasingly like a cliff and you need drag radials to keep the ground in proper contact with the car, and.... it's just not a car for driving around any more.
    • I already reached that conclusion myself after reading up a whole bunch and watching various videos from multiple sources. Don't know yet how I'd best manage that with the least amount of headache. Probably pulling the sump and just welding on a AN10 adapter or something. I also think it's healthy to take most opinions with a grain of salt, because experiences differ wildly and especially Aussies - when talking about RBs - don't know a world below 600whp drag builds. Personally I doubt I will ever take my R33 racing, so it's going to be a street car with the occasional spirited drive. Hence why I am (so far) under the impression that I'm going to be fine with a stock-ish engine for a while.
×
×
  • Create New...