Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have an intermittent problem.....occasionally when i launch 1st gear and hit the limiter then dump and go WOT in 2nd gear i get what feels like a missfire...but by the middle of third gear it goes i keep my foot up it. I'm wondering if this could be a fuel problem instead of ignition? i don't get knock when this is happening but i've not had a wideband on when its done it. i'm up to the last simple thing to try and correct it which is reduce spark plug gap to 0.6mm thought i might try changing the coil pack loom and check the ignitor...any thoughts?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/440272-ignition-breakup/
Share on other sites

My thoughts are don't go to 0.6mm and you should try brand new coils and new ignitor before doing anything else. The factory gap is 1.1mm and 0.8mm most of the time is enough if you have weakening coils to avoid spark blowout, but running 0.6mm is just crazy imo. You will be loosing power. What heat range plugs you running? Better not go 7 unless you have a race engine.

Edited by sonicz

I have split fires, and NGK bkr7eix new plugs gapped at 0.8mm, i've also set my dwell time to that of a factory GTR. I haven't done the ignitor yet and i was reading around that re-doing the earths for the coil loom is a good thing to do. I'm pushing 16psi through a factory highflowed turbo. jeez hope its not one my coils...they're fekin expensive.

Yup 16 Psi will definitely hit the "boost cut" of the stock AFM, but I doubt thats his problem as he is able to go WOT in 1st and the problem only arises at the start of 2nd.

Man why are u running Iridium plugs with a 7 heat range gapped at 0.8mm? Thats just drowning the motor each way possible.

Iridiums suck, and 7 is too cold unless the engine is a heavily tuned race engine which spends most of its liviving at 8000RPM on a racetrack and the stock gap is 1.1mm.

Get coppers. Go to 6 heat range. You can stick with 0.8mm to prevent blowout, but you may find you are ok with 1.1 as well. You will get much more, power, economy, efficiency at all RPM. Just watch for pinging and not leaning out the engine when you make the change. I can actually say I speak from 1st hand experience and trial and error on this. Thank me later?

Edited by sonicz

i also have a z32 afm and powerfc. the plugs i had in before these ones were pfr6g gapped to 0.8mm. its cheap enough to try the bcp's i suppose. the problem started on the pfr6g's which is one reason why i went the heat range colder.

might worth a while checking all the connection with the wiring loom, I had this issue on my CA before, and turned out to be a broken connector. unless its the fuel pump cutting out intermediately which can also lead to similar effect.

  • Like 1

thanks good advice. I have had a sneaking feeling about the pump and the coil loom is brittle as Hell...to the point where some of the plastic clips have broken. as far as fuel pumps go...what is the recommendation these days? aem, walbro or deutschwerks

I am running PFR7G gapped to 0.8mm at the recommendation of my tuner and it revs to its 7000 maximum at 1.5 bar no problem. The fact that your engine runs fine in 1st and not in 2nd suggests you may be running out of fuel. The new Walbro 465LPH E85 pumps are supposed to be pretty good (best if directly wired for full battery voltage).

I found only bosch pumps cutting out intermediately, especially the 040. It makes a loud buzzing sound also. Walbro pumps usually just blows up straight, I have not experienced intermediate cuts with them. The 460L/H Walbro if are you getting/got one. it needs an extra earth, which you just tee the earth wiring out side the tank, and bolt it to the chassis.

Plugs needs to be gaped to 0.8 as others mentioned.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This has clearly gone off on quite a tangent but the suggestion was "go standalone because you probably aren't going to stop at just exhaust + a mild tune and manual boost controller", not "buy a standalone purely for a boost controller". If the scope does in fact stop creeping at an EBC then sure, buy an EVC7 or Profec or whatever else people like to run and stop there. And I have yet to see any kind of aftermarket boost control that is more complicated than a PID controller with some accounting for edge cases. Control system theory is an incredibly vast field yet somehow we always end up back at some variant of a PID controller, maybe with some work done to linearize things. I have done quite a lot, but I don't care to indulge in those pissing matches, hence posting primary sources. I deal with people quite frequently that scream and shout about how their opinion matters more because they've shipped more x or y, it doesn't change the reality of the data they're trying to disagree with. Arguing that the source material is wrong is an entirely separate point and while my experience obviously doesn't matter here I've rarely seen factory service manuals be incorrect about something. It's not some random poorly documented internal software tool that is constantly being patched to barely work. It's also not that hard to just read the Japanese and double check translations either. Especially in automotive parts most of it is loanwords anyways.
    • If you are keeping the current calipers you need to keep the current disc as the spacing of the caliper determines the disc diameter. Have you trial fitted the GTS brakes fit on a GTSt hub or is this forward planning? There could be differences in caliper mount spacing, backing plate and even hub shape that could cause an issue.
    • Hi there I have a r33 gts with 4 stud small brakes, I'm going to convert to 5 stud but keep the small brakes, what size rotor would I need?
    • First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
×
×
  • Create New...