Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im playing it on xbone.... trying to decide how much i like it, very fast paced, games are too short though. Theyve decided to release an aus server today but its a bit broken, it is good if you're playing with others, like all multiplayer games, well I seem to enjoy them more when others are on

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/440496-titanfall/#findComment-7227844
Share on other sites

I'd recommend it. Quite enjoyable.

The campaign is rubbish. But you need to complete both sides to access the Stryder and Ogre.

Gameplay is well paced, the movement system discourages camping quite a bit. And people use weapons that aren't sniper rifles, amazing!

Maps are really well engineered, titan/pilot balance is spot on, game modes are solid, if a little unoriginal.

Hell of a lot of 'holy shit, did you see that?!?!' moments.

I'd like some extra customisation options, as it is all you can do is change the pilot gender, and I'd like to be able to change the loadout names, but they're relatively minor complaints.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/440496-titanfall/#findComment-7228270
Share on other sites

I'd recommend it. Quite enjoyable.

The campaign is rubbish. But you need to complete both sides to access the Stryder and Ogre.

Gameplay is well paced, the movement system discourages camping quite a bit. And people use weapons that aren't sniper rifles, amazing!

Maps are really well engineered, titan/pilot balance is spot on, game modes are solid, if a little unoriginal.

Hell of a lot of 'holy shit, did you see that?!?!' moments.

I'd like some extra customisation options, as it is all you can do is change the pilot gender, and I'd like to be able to change the loadout names, but they're relatively minor complaints.

played it more last night and gave ctf a go, i found it a lot more fun and intense, waaaay better than attrition

yeah map sizes are pretty much bang on for titan vs pilots.

i cant really see the other weapons of use, carbine seems to be the pick atm...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/440496-titanfall/#findComment-7228276
Share on other sites

Hardpoint, CTF, and Last Titan Standing are my favourites. Attrition is meh. Pilot Hunter is pretty intense, but not a favourite.

EVA-8 is my preferred starter gun, GA24 and Hemlok once they come available are quite effective. Spitfire is bulk useless as far as I'm concerned.

XO16 is much the same. 40mm cannon, railgun, and the Triple threat are my picks for Titan weaponry.

Throw in cluster bombs and multi lock missiles and you're onto a winner.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/440496-titanfall/#findComment-7228293
Share on other sites

watched a friend play it last night. just another twitch shooter with better mobility. I think id get bored pretty quick. There doesnt seem to be much strategy or drastically different maps because you have to accomodate for the mechs.

What I did like though was the end of battle attempt to escape (if loss) and get extra points

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/440496-titanfall/#findComment-7228709
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...