Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Pretty much as the title says. It's and auto s1 stagea but still just a 25. All stock except bov have been plumbed up. had this issue before I did that. Read heaps of forums and did most of the things suggested (cleaning aac etc) afm seems fine but hard to call. Any ideas? It's drivable but will stall out when you back off at a slow rolling speed so I pretty much idle through carparks.

have you set your idle correctly? get the car up to temp stop the car...unplug the tps....start the car...turn the idle screw on the aac valve till you have it idling at 750. turn car off...plug the tps back in.....if it still runs like shit after that it could be your tps.

Cheers badgaz will do that in the morn. Bov has been deleted completely and made a new intake pipe

Why?

Put recirc bov back on.

The reverb screws around with the airflow meter reading leading to the issue you have described.

Well, your initial post isn't particularly clear. I suppose you are in a rush for people to help fix your problem.

Somehow bov plumbed up equals blocked off?

Was it previously the stock bov recirculating as per stock?

I usually pretty much idle through car parks also, lots safer than boosting through them.

Superben. Firstly thanks for a mature comment. the engine was completely stock in every way and had the ssame issue. As for the bov, New intake pipe deleted that line, blocked other lines and put a plate over the bov where it goes into the manifold.

It's not the issue.

As for idling through Carparks I have no issue with that. It's a daily running stock boost. It IS drivable. just any speed below around 50km if you completely release the throttle it will die the revs down to almost a stall.

Productive comments are appreciated. if not fk off to boostcruising. Cheers

Typical as the new guy to a forum you would ease into things before potentially offending knowledgeable people who were willing to take their time to help you.

It's pretty hard to judge someone's true character based on a few (or even alot) of posts.

Not sure if your trying to have a dig or not. Signed up and posted in hope of getting some useful feedback from other owners, which in fact I got. The other comments are useless and there's no need for them. I referred to boostcruising for obvious reasons. I thought maybe a website dedicated to specific cars might have been a little different. Maybe your all having a lend and think it's funny? Sorry can't tell, this is text after all. I have stated that positive feedback is appreciated and will continue to thank those who are actually knowledgeable and offering their help.

+1 for BOV not helping the situation.

I have an auto R33 atm and since putting a Blitz atmo on back off it almost stalls. But I live with it for the hektik doses it does :yucky: ..

I'd be pressure testing the system for leaks as they will also create stall issues along with the bov set-up..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If that's the wiring from the factory, I'd be inspecting the loom everywhere.   Any signs of that anywhere else, and seriously, I'd get rid of the car ASAP before the electrical gremlins make it worthless, or it goes up in flames on its own. That is scary how that insulation is failing!
    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
×
×
  • Create New...