Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My apologies if this has been covered before but I'm having a hard time fishing for this info..

im assuming the 5sp manual box for the c34 is the same as an r33 but which model? gt/t/r/st? Does anyone know of a model/part number for these trannies? The reason I ask is to find a suitable adjustable short shifter and I just want to make sute I get the right one before forking out da monies

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/441403-gearbox-model-2000-rs4s/
Share on other sites

Ive been trying to find an adjustable one but otherwise tossing up between:

http://www.rhdjapan.com/nismo-solid-short-shifter-r32-r33-r34-stagea-4wd.html

http://www.nengun.com/nismo/short-shift

"tossing up?" Exactly the same item RN595. $5 difference in price.

I vote keep your money and don't bother.

The shift speed has more to with the gearbox synchros than the throw of the shifter.

Its not just about the speed of the shift, its more about the feel

Oh well. Buy it and report back. It's 10 percent shorter with harder rubber, good luck noticing much other than the placebo affect because you spent money and it's nismo!

The difference between your opinion and pizza is that I asked for pizza Edited by staglover

Im just saying that my question was to do with the gearbox model because I was after a short shifter. Not 'what's some opinions on short shifters?'. Each to their own though, I understand. Also, yes, I would like an adjustable one. Though im not sure they exist, Im not going to settle for my preference for second best just cos I cant find what I'm after straight off the bat. Sorry if my crappy analogy offended in any way, shape or form.

Ps. I appreciate you trying to save a brother some coin :D

Edited by staglover

I have taken all your advice btw and I thank you all for it. I realise that I obviously need to do more research before taking any leaps of faith.. this is all new to me. I'm the first to say that I know far from everything and I'm treating everything as a learning curve. After reading my comment again, it does come across quite cocky (which it wasnt meant to be) and I apologize. The last thing I want to do is piss people off who are trying to help me out.. I love these forums as a knowledge base, please dont cast me off for something I'm not because of a misinterpreted comment. What more can i say?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If you are keeping the current calipers you need to keep the current disc as the spacing of the caliper determines the disc diameter. Have you trial fitted the GTS brakes fit on a GTSt hub or is this forward planning? There could be differences in caliper mount spacing, backing plate and even hub shape that could cause an issue.
    • Hi there I have a r33 gts with 4 stud small brakes, I'm going to convert to 5 stud but keep the small brakes, what size rotor would I need?
    • First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
    • That's awesome, well done! Love all these older Datsun / Nissans so rare now
×
×
  • Create New...