Jump to content
SAU Community

Neo Head Help...


Recommended Posts

I wanted to use a neo head on my series 2 gtst. I've searched for hours on different forums but couldn't find the answers I'm lokking for.

1- will my greddy plenum and 6 boost manifolds fit onto a neo head?

2- what are the complications with doing the neo head conversion apart from the raised compression ratio?

Currently the car is running 360rwkw on stock motor and I wanted to start building an engine on the side to drop in when this one gets tired.

I don't want to start changing manifolds. I'm budget conscious but I also understand its not going to be cheap.

The head I was looking at was the lewis engines rb25 neo ultimate head package.

My application is mainly just eventually just a crazy weekend street car and monthly drag car.

I will eventually chase more power but for now I will just go to the limit of my gt3582r.

So basically I want to do it in stages as money becomes available.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ex manifold same. Inlet ports different shape. Would therefore benefit from correct inlet manifold.

Having to change manifold shouldn't be a problem. Simply buy new manifold, and sell existing one after the swap is done.

There are also various sensor differences that you will want to take into consideration, depending on what ECU you're using.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have not seen them side by side but I seem to remember people saying that R33 and R34 RB25DET inlet manifold gaskets are the same , something to check on .

If I was building up another engine I'd leave the Neo head for that one and get pistons to suit it . Maybe even buy a complete Neo to rebuild .

A .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GTSBoy is correct.

Exhaust is the same, intake it different.

Be mindful that NEO's have a different piston shape to accommodate for the combustion chamber size. Simply installing a NEO head on a R33 RB25 will result in an unknown compression ratio, potentially making the motor more detonation prone and counteracting your efforts.

Consider the value in the swap before proceeding. The R33 head has proven a good performer all the same.

Edited by GTScotT
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Hello this is my first post/reply early model neo engines 1997-1998 versions share the same ports and cas as s2 r33 so all manifolds are interchangeable only major difference is the rear oil seal seat you will need neo flywheel r33 flywheel fouls on it very easy conversion to do no wiring changes just flywheel hope this helps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm running R32 flywheel on Neo also. No fouling.

That particular "early Neo" situation is a special one I think. I don't think that those engines are true Neos. These are the ones that were seen in some of the Stageas around that time, right? They look like a cross between a R33 and R34 motor, with nothing looking quite right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct was unlike the s2 engine or for a fact any 25 I've worked on.i will post when the I pull engine out again this week for a kero build I'll take pics of rods pistons head oil pump and lifters just for reference purpose the block has two oil returns as well so will be good to see what you all have to say and what is meant by true neo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good idea. I'm sure the information on them is already around here somewhere, but finding it might not be easy. Another post with the info you plan to get will be welcome.

For reference, when I was looking for a Neo for my R32 a local Jap wrecker had one of these engines. I had a look at it, decided not to touch it. The concencus from a few people I asked, one of whom is my bro-in-law who runs a performance workshop and has played with nearly every such engine, is that these "not true Neos" are just that. I think they are old 25s with a few Neo looking bits and pieces on the outside. Not the small chamber, solid lifter head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheers for putting me strait about this apparent gap filling engine I never pulled it down before I put it in was just a cheap thrash engine and copped it for a year so will be very interesting to compare pics of rods heads and generally the whole engine I'll hopefully post it by early next week my health will be the only hold up cheers GTSaboy for your input

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have just fitted a Greddy plenum to my NEO And the intake ports are the same, Bolt holes are in the same place, And sitting the gasket on both shows they are in the same place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...