Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys.

Long story short I have decided to delete VCT out of my RB25. At the moment I have HKS cams in it and a HKS adjustable cam gear on the exhaust side. So I need a new cam on the intake and another cam gear. The Problem I have is when I bought my motor I was told it had aftermarket valves and springs in it. but the old owner of the motor didn't know to much. So now im going to get a new set of cams im not sure what I should do. Is it worth taking the head to see if it has valves and springs and if it does I can go bigger cams or should just slap the same size cams back in it but non VCT.

Just want to hear people opinions on the situation?

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/442178-rb25-non-vct-cams/
Share on other sites

8.9mm is about the limit before you would need to lift the head and have it machined for clearance if you went for higher lift.

You will find that the likes of Kelford, Camtech, and Tighe can supply fixed cam profile that's compatible with hydraulic lifters.

Im in a similar boat, ive got camtech 272s 9mm lift with after market valves/springs, I asked for the 272s to be drilled to suit vct, but im thinking about going down the route of ditching the vct and putting an adjustable intake cam gear on and putting some overlap on the cams and retuning to suit. any ideas from ppl with experience? I mean most setups around 500atw mark aren't using vct, so why should I?

Broadly speaking, I suspect the factory had emissions/economy targets to reach, and their design brief required smooth usable torque from 1500-4500rpm. VCT plays a big role in hitting those marks.

Someone chasing 500rwhp has targets that don't really include emissions or economy, and the engine is likely to spin between 4500-8000 depending on cubic capacity. Strong low rpm torque may not be a high priority and lets face it between 3-4000 an RB25 or 30 in the 500rwhp range will be making significantly more mumbo than most. Would you notice the lack of VCT in that area? Probably. Would it be a big loss? Probably depends on how frequently you actually access the potential.

For a 100% race use I'd think a well matched fixed cam, properly dialled in would be viable and remove one layer of complexity. For 100% road use and with a set of VCT cams it would be hard to think why you would ditch them other than to have a play.

  • Like 1

Where did you read that most people making around 500 aren't using vct?

As Dale said if its street only VCT for the win. If not if its living life up in the rev range fixed cams will be fine.

But seriously sacrificing low down torque driveabilty and turbo response for a lumpy idle is just plain homosex :/

Fyi -I have a non/pre vct head on my 30, at standard cam timing there is alot of standoff/reverberations coming out the intake at low rpm under load, and it lacked low end torque for it. I've had to dial the intake cam quite a bit to get low end torque and boost to come on lower in the rpm range.

But at the expense of high rpm performance, it now falls over abit up high.

I believe that Vct helps to overcome this, and helps to provide a wide power band on 1 cam profile.

^^^ then why would you even consider ditching it? VCT is your friend.... Unless you like the "nothing, nothing.... BOOM" delivery, then go for it.

At the end if the day, our cars are not light with short stroke, small capacity engine with relatively low wish comp ratios with tallish gearing . Monster cams and throwing away VCT are only going to make them harder to drive on the street.

If you don't want it, I'll buy it off you and put it on my engine :P

  • Like 1

I gave camtech a call today and they said go with 268 cams exhaust and intake and 9.00mm lift. I hope my car has springs in it. if it doesn't would my motor still hold up?

You'll just valve float which will limit your boost and or rpm.

A set of suitable valve springs will hardly break the bank.

$600 for my springs and Ti retainers. Retainers were actually lighter and fit better than the 2 x more expensive jap crap.

Once again, jap shit fails - won't buy jap again.

$600 for my springs and Ti retainers. Retainers were actually lighter and fit better than the 2 x more expensive jap crap.

Once again, jap shit fails - won't buy jap again.

No offense intended, but you just made me lough out loud! You do realise your engine is jap built? (but I do understand what your saying) Edited by nicksamaniac

No offense intended, but you just made me lough out loud! You do realise your engine is jap built? (but I do understand what your saying)

Lol. Rightio mate. I'm not talking OEM parts, I'm talking what often is expensive stuff, aftermarket gear. I'll give you an example.

HKS step two valve springs used with an aggressive custom made cam valve floated at around 5500 at 20 psi on my own engine. Pulled them out along with the mega dollar Jun Ti retainers and put in a a set from camtech. Not only did it not valve float but the retainers fit the spring much better, also 1/3rd the price!

Exhausts, you'd be crazy not to get a custom one made. It'll fit better and not really be much more expensive.

Nice pretty sard fuel rail - doesn't have a seat for the injectors to but up against. Waste of cash.

Tomei manifolds - not worth the box they came in as they crack. I've personally done two sets and a mate has one off an Evo currently holding down the concrete in his garage. Cracked to hell.

That's only a few examples.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • A locally delivered Infiniti have remote start installed but don't come with the remote start key. You need a new remote start key and they just need it programed. And this is different to making/programing a new key that just starts the car.  
    • Cheers, and cheers for sharing so much of the build and also sharing the glimpse of what turns out to bring a lot of us poor decision makers together haha.  I do recommend learning more about how to manage it, if not considering getting a  formal diagnosis.  The discussion with the psychiatrist I got my diagnosis through was quite eye opening, things I'd not even considered to be ADHD related and hadn't mentioned were things she asked about out of the blue and were common themes with people with my flavour of ADHD.   It's not a label for people who are hyperactive and ill-attentive, there's more to it than that and some of it can be much more challenging or damaging - though there are of course two sides to the thing, and a lot of the stuff we have to go through and work on to live with it make us effectively "better" at other things as well. Aside from the fact that there is some argument I could have a bit of ASD seasoning in there (came up during the diagnosis, and neurodiverse things seem to not stay as a cookie cut) I suspect you need to learn more about ADHD if you are puzzled about how hyperfocus could possibly apply.  I *do* personally use "superpower" with quotes deliberately, but it's 100% an ADHD thing due to the exact reason that lack of focus is also an ADHD thing... Loosely speaking the inattentive side of ADHD isn't the inability to focus, it's the inability to control where the focus goes.  Not being able to sleep because brain is more interested in thinking about a stupid thing I said to a girl I liked 30 years ago, not being able to focus on work because my brain is more keen on putting together the torque management strategy we're going to try out with a drag car next weekend, not being able to focus on a conversation with someone I WANT to listen to and respect because there is a flickering light in my peripheral vision.    If I could just stop work and build the torque management setup right there and then I'd not hear anything else until it was done.  
    • Maybe you should do some more reading.  Google positive effects of ADHD and you'll get your answers.  One of my personal downsides of ADHD has been talking before I think.   Maybe you have it too?
    • Excuse me for butting in....but which part of ADHD can be considered a superpower? I would have though it far more likely that some ASD comorbidity is more likely to be contributing to an ability to hyperfocus on something. ADHD being aimed somewhat in the other direction. My shed looks like your shed. My whiteboard list of unfinished projects has entries going back 15 years. I know what you're talking about - I just struggle to connect ADHD to the results being discussed.
    • Thanks for reaching out!  It's a blessing and a curse at the same time.  I'm undiagnosed but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see it in me... I have more half started projects laying around my house, shed, garden, etc taking up space and money, destroying aesthetics than if I added up all of my mates projects together. But, ADHD gives me the ability to hyper focus on things that no mere mortal could even  comprehend.  A recent pool build is an example of that....  I dont know anyone else that would be dumb enough and focused enough to take on then complete something of that magnitude. I call ADHD a superpower but it can equally be completely destructive if not controlled and focusedon the right places. Addiction is a major concern to ADHD people and thankfully my addictions have been no worse than projects, XBOX, chocolate and being an arsehole! It's often hereditary and my 13 year old son is currently learning how to drive it at the moment. Keep lurking! If i can finally finish this bloody thing at some point it will be a win for all of us ADHD'ers! 🤪
×
×
  • Create New...