Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  On 23/11/2015 at 11:44 AM, BoostdR said:

The inlet track to the turbine is opened up all the way around. It even injects air under the turbine by about 40% Do you think this is why I have 20psi at 4700rpm and when running 25psi it goes from 25 at 4850 to 18psi at 6500..

Yes this is partially why I think you have lag issues, it is what's referred to as exhaust gas interference. The reason your boost is decreasing in higher rpm is due to the loss of efficiency through the interference.

  On 23/11/2015 at 11:01 AM, hypergear said:

On the video you've uploaded earlier, I've noticed the right hand actuator has a spring hooked on to the base. Will you be able to repeat the test with that spring removed?

Here is the standard actuator travel test as requested... Travel identical as per the external spring.

https://youtu.be/h9JGm1vsTjw

Here are the long awaited results of the intense billet rs... The dyno graph shows the intense billet rs (blue) vs Hypergear ss2 rev 2 (red) both running just under 30 psi on pump e85 with identical settings and dynoed within days of eachother.

post-141141-0-82747500-1448368160_thumb.jpg

  • Like 2
  On 24/11/2015 at 12:29 PM, Intense m35 said:

Here are the long awaited results of the intense billet rs... The dyno graph shows the intense billet rs (blue) vs Hypergear ss2 rev 2 (red) both running just under 30 psi on pump e85 with identical settings and dynoed within days of eachother.

Thanks Rick.

Pretty stoked with how the new turbo feels on the road, The car feels light and responsive in comparison which surprised me given the increase in power. Now I have a genuine 300kw with the response we all chase.

This works well with the stock converter, I am able to easily push 10+psi at stall when stationary allowing a decent launch. Looks like we built the perfect turbo first time around.

Hopefully I can get some time to head down to Calder or Heathcote for a 1/4 run soon, I suspect this will surprise.

  • Like 4
  On 24/11/2015 at 7:48 PM, BoostdR said:

That's a 3000rpm convertor?

I sold the 3k converter to Fishingfreak with the GTX kit. My current converter has a stock stator with a beefed up triple Patrol lockup clutch, which I ran to a 12v switch for tuning purposes. It should react exactly the same as a stock box in manual mode 3rd gear.

The blue line stops at 7k, the red was 7600 revs to compare the speed axis.

  • Like 1

In that case 10psi on the stock convertor (2200-2300rpm?) is a huge improvement over my 2psi. I would expect launch control/ignition retard would work also since 10psi is already in the spool zone. Onto a good thing there.

Is it ball bearing?

Looks like a KTS billet compressor wheel which responds better than the GTX copy billet wheels from what I have tested due to the slim root(lighter, larger blade area per wheel diameter), extended tips(more flow for minimal rotational mass increase), thin blade(lighter, higher efficiency) and high blade design(blade area increase).

Matt

Happy to give you a call to discuss it Matt, PM me your number.

It's still a bush core highflow, but there is zero shaft play unlike the Hypergear offerings. I can only assume that's why his require so much oil flow, these do not. I don't think Tao understands VQ25's run over 10 bar oil pressure, even though I have explained it to him many times, why he insists on running such loose shaft tolerances I have no idea, it only forces him to give the turbine/compressor wheels more clearance from the housings which is detrimental to efficiency. He is stuck in RB land.

I would like to get the launch ignition retard working, but I will do that on the Link, my tuner isn't confident on the HKS to get that operating, and I would need a speed input. Time for another ECU upgrade. :)

it all becomes clear. I did note a fair clearance on the comp wheel side...as you say for end float compensation.

Yes speed input is required. I used the yellow wire with black trace from the TCU(it's close to center).

EMU settings: 16 pulse and 32% correction factor.

Edited by BoostdR

Tao is quite determined to make up for the previous lack of on car evaluation. We should see some new products coming soon which is all good for us M35 owners..

"how we react after we have made a mistake defines who we are"

yes it got a bit messy while the facts were coming out but we are all flawed in some way. I'm not one to hold a grudge if the offender is willing to make good.

  On 24/11/2015 at 12:29 PM, Intense m35 said:

Here are the long awaited results of the intense billet rs... The dyno graph shows the intense billet rs (blue) vs Hypergear ss2 rev 2 (red) both running just under 30 psi on pump e85 with identical settings and dynoed within days of eachother.

post-141141-0-82747500-1448368160_thumb.

No, The red line was not from the a SS2 Rev 2, its just your turbo running longer dyno ramp.

This is SS2 Rev 2, running 22psi. E85 fuel limited to actuator travel. Compare red n red then Blue to Blue to yours.

The new turbo doesn't appears to be more responsive on paper unless there are other changes made to the car.

power.jpg

lol, someone's a sore loser. I'm getting more and more disappointed with you with every reply.

I only did what was asked of me, I legitimately went out of my way to test the differences between the two turbo's, discounting the fact that my SS2 was a noisy pos shagged turbo anyway. The noises it made at nearly 30 pounds were absolutely hilarious. I couldn't wait to get it off my car. I can't believe you tried to tell me it was normal.

Now you have decided to call me a liar? Shame on you Tao, I was a good customer of yours until this debacle, now everyone is seeing you for what you are, full of crap. Go and check the graph out if you like, as my tuner has advised you want to, try and prove we somehow fudged the figures. Infact why don't you put your car on the dyno and show us how responsive your latest development is. :P

PS, learn to read a graph, that one is in RPM which isn't very accurate with an auto gearboxes at the best of times... You have a lot to learn mate.

  On 25/11/2015 at 3:59 AM, hypergear said:

No, The red line was not from the a SS2 Rev 2, its just your turbo running longer dyno ramp.

You really have no idea when to stop do you tao? Calling myself, Scotty and cihan liars just goes to show the level you have stooped too. We have put in a huge amount of work into this development and I think it is very unprofessional for you to be making accusations without facts to back it up.

Edited by Intense m35

Fisrt of all. I respect who evers work and efforts in developments of a new product. I certainly not calling any one lairs.

Because the shape of the curve appeared to be quite different to an earlier run I have seen and the comparison had identical ramp up shape down low. Hence my suspicion and questions.

Of course Im not quitting til I beat your result. Further researches will be conducted.

  On 25/11/2015 at 7:03 AM, hypergear said:

Fisrt of all. I respect who evers work and efforts in developments of a new product. I certainly not calling any one lairs.

Because the shape of the curve appeared to be quite different to an earlier run I have seen and the comparison had identical ramp up shape down low. Hence my suspicion and questions.

Further researches will be conducted.

As I read your post " no the red line was not from the ss2 rev 2 it's just your turbo running longer dyno ramp" says you are calling me a liar! There was no suspecision, it was a outright accusation And also if you believe our turbo isn't more responsive and what not, let's just settle this by you coming for a drive!

While doing our best to keep out of the tit for tat - as both Scotty and Hypergear are Etuner customers - I can confirm that Scott did in fact bring the car back in for another dyno session to be able to demonstrate an apples to apples comparison between the turbos.

14th August : 8495S - 271awkw ; un-locked converter SS2 turbo 22psi
19th November : 9524S - 281awkw ; locked converter SS2 turbo, maxed out
24th November : 9546S - 303awkw ; locked converter new turbo, maxed out

Both are no doubt very stellar results from a "bolt-on" turbo on an otherwise internally standard engine.

Cihan @ Etuner

Edited by Cihan

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As you're looking at using a Link ECU, then large injectors are not a problem. But there's not really any need to go 1000s on an RB20 unless you're planning >>600HP on E85, which would seem unlikely. There are other options for injectors. The Xspurt ones are available from a number of places and you can get them in the mid 600s and 725cc, which is probably a sensible place to be. These are all EV14 based. If you are not using the stock AFM (at all, which would be the case with a Link) then a large turbo intake pipe to suit the ATR turbos is not an obstacle, so you should use one instead of a highflow. Results will be better.
    • Hey guys,  I'm after some advice and this here is the best place to get it imo. I was a member a looong time ago under another account, with a lost email address. Its nice to jump back on and see some of the same names still giving good advice.  I mothballed my car when i moved to perth in 2013, and after getting towed across the nullabor a few times it has officially done more km's on a trailer than under its own power. Now that i have started the process of tidying up and modifying it, i see the fruit available (and the fruiterers selling the produce) is different than back in the day. hence my questions, as i used to 'know' what to get and now, i'm not so sure. Engine wise the car (92 gtst) has a walbro 255, k+n, fmic, cam gears and and turbo back 3"exhaust. Wish list is a Hypergear high flow or ATR43G1, Link G4x and some newer injectors before a tune up. My goals are modest, only low 200's power wise. i know i could achieve this with less, but i've been swapping out old for new where i can. Every cooling hose has been replaced, along with mani gaskets, WP, thermostat and radiator, fuel pump and timing belt, tensioner and idler, and i rebuilt the steering rack. Regarding the injectors, the fruiterers all seem to sell what used to be considered quite large injectors. There are a lot of options for bosch 1000cc EV14's, and i would like to know if that is a suitable choice for my build. Is modern injector design good enough to run these at the low duty cycles that i likely would be? is there a downside to running a too large injector these days? or, would there be an upside to running a smaller injector at higher duty cycle? I can see that there are smaller injectors still available, but the ones i have seen specifically marketed for RB's are pretty large (see: https://golebysparts.au/collections/fuel-rail-injector-kits/products/nissan-rb20-fuel-rail-bosch-980cc-1150cc-injectors-turbosmart-fpr800-regulator-kit), and i dont know enough about them to say one not marketed for RB's would fit or not. I have searched the forums, and amongst all the posts on older tech, I did see gtsboy recommend EV14's, but no size was mentioned... again, i'm not clear on if the smaller size bosch injectors are also EV14's as they do look similar.  also, if someone can recommend a tuner familiar with RB's in the Geelong or West Melbourne area i'd appreciate it. Thanks in advance guys. Cheers, Rowdy  
    • FWIW the depth of the groove in the rubber pad is not super essential, the blocks are rubber and squish a bit. If you are worried an angle grinder will make a deeper groove quick smart
    • I mean, if you were to move the jacking points away from the original location, that is, away from the wheels and closer to the centreline of the car, then it will be more likely to overbalance and tip off the supports. Same as we talked about before. I was talking about moving for-aft. If the sill is bent outward or inward, then the car would obviously look unstraight from the outside. Hopefully that hasn't happened either. Again, you can do comparative measurements from the chassis rails to see if there is much deflection.
    • Can you elaborate what you mean with your first sentence? I meant move as in the bulge kinda seemed like it got pulled "outward" meaning it got pulled down and to the side with the jacking rail itself, so the load bearing bulge now sits lower than usual and is not level with the sill on the other side of the jack point. Either that or the jacking rail just got pushed in a good bit.
×
×
  • Create New...