Jump to content
SAU Community

Fuel Cells And Surge Tanks

Adz2332

By Adz2332,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

Adz2332 Grand Master

Adz2332

Posted
Posted

Hey all

Has anyone had any experience with fuel cells and also surge tanks?

Im looking at buying one of each for an e85 set up with twin external walbro pumps.

Do these both need to be baffled inside?

What is the difference between ones for a few hundred to thousands??

Any recommendations of brands?

Is there any difference id need for e85 over petrol?

Anyone actually have pics in your car?

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/442564-fuel-cells-and-surge-tanks/
Share on other sites
DCIEVE Mentor

DCIEVE

Posted
Posted

The expensive ones have bladders, internal baffles, internal pick-ups etc whereas the cheap ones are just an empty tank. If you run a surge as well you can get away with the empty tank (and some get away with a basic cell and no surge though I wouldn't risk it) - the only benefit of the expensive ones in that case is the safety of a bladder. The empty cells are typically filled with foam, just make sure it's e85 safe.

Keep in mind plastic cells will deform if you don't use a functioning breather and support them properly whereas ally tanks are a little heavier. They all have their place, just weigh up the pros and cons and decide which best suits your particular application keeping in mind legality for the street or your racing class.

scotty nm35 Grand Master

scotty nm35

Posted
Posted

It was for my 19L poly surge tank, as long as the poly tank is completely full I won't need any foam or baffling. I just need to keep the twin Walbro's in the main tank for it to not empty, as the Fuelab is running 10an lines.

I ended up buying a Jaz brand tank.

DCIEVE Mentor

DCIEVE

Posted
Posted

Interesting arrangement, your min fuel load is going to be 20 litres then (empty main tank, full 'surge'). You will also need a large return line to the main tank from the poly tank to minimise pressure or it will balloon when it gets warm. I'm curious why you didn't use a conventional surge tank?

scotty nm35 Grand Master

scotty nm35

Posted
Posted

How long would a 2L surge tank last if the main tank pumps are sucking dry around corners? Not long was my theory. A surge tank needs to stay full, and my stupid saddlebag main fuel tank arrangement surges at 3/4 at the track.

19L would give me extra range on the road in a pinch also.

As for the return, I am using the 6an top breather fitting to take it back to the main tank. Should be enough considering the fuel rails return to the main tank. If it balloons I will make a sturdy alloy tank.

DCIEVE Mentor

DCIEVE

Posted
Posted

No worries Scotty, you've obviously thought it through so this is mainly for the OP's benefit. If you return the rails to the surge you have a near enough to full surge after a corner assuming it was full beforehand (without arguing semantics about partial throttle). And at wot with 500odd kW you're using well under 8L/min, and never at wot for more than 30sec without braking = 4L. Not to mention on the gas typically means a flooded pickup at the rear of a drag cell. Anyway just just some numbers I pulled from memory, it's easy enough to work out your actual fuel demand and some likely scenarios in a great deal more detail (circuit, 1000m drags and in car vids with telemetry etc) to design the surge tank around, in my case I ended up with 4L. Another point worth mentioning is surge tanks are typically tall relative to diameter/width (high aspect) so they can run down without the main pumps drawing air.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • soviet_merlin
      Oem radio & steering wheel shroud for r33 (vic)

      By soviet_merlin · Posted

      That's odd, it works fine here. Try loading it on a different device or browser? It's Jack Phillips JDM, a Skyline wrecker in Victoria. Not the cheapest, but I have found them helpful to find obscure parts in AU. https://jpjdm.com/shop/index.php
    • GTSBoy
      R34 GTT RB rough idle problem with weird RPM gauge fluctuations

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Yeah. I second all of the above. The only way to see that sort of voltage is if something is generating it as a side effect of being f**ked up. The other thing you could do would be to put a load onto that 30V terminal, something like a brakelamp globe. See if it pulls the voltage away comepletely or if some or all of it stays there while loaded. Will give you something of an idea about how much danger it could cause.
    • MBS206
      R34 GTT RB rough idle problem with weird RPM gauge fluctuations

      By MBS206 · Posted

      I would say, you've got one hell of an underlying issue there. You're saying, coils were fully unplugged, and the fuse to that circuit was unplugged, and you measured 30v? Either something is giving you some WILD EMI, and that's an induced voltage, OR something is managing to backfeed, AND that something has problems. It could be something like the ECU if it takes power from there, and also gets power from another source IF there's an internal issue in the ECU. The way to check would be pull that fuse, unplug the coils, and then probe the ECU pins. However it could be something else doing it. Additionally, if it is something wired in, and that something is pulsing, IE a PWM circuit and it's an inductive load and doesnt have proper flyback protection, that would also do it. A possibility would be if you have something like a PWM fuel pump, it might be giving flyback voltages (dangerous to stuff!). I'd put the circuit back into its "broken" state, confirm the weird voltage is back, and then one by one unplug devices until that voltage disappears. That's a quick way to find an associated device. Otherwise I'd need to look at the wiring diagrams, and then understand any electrical mods done.   But you really should not be seeing the above issue, and really, it's indicating something is failing, and possibly why the fuse blew to begin with.
    • The Bogan
      Exhaust silencers/varex exhausts

      By The Bogan · Posted

      Yeah Nah, Sydney 
    • Lithium
      Compressor flow comparison table

      By Lithium · Posted

      A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
×
×
  • Create New...