Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Some maybe familiar with what a "Fuel Catalyst" is, for those that aren't I have attached a link below or just do a google search....

I guess these are one of those "sceptical/gimmick" products that claims to do a number of things:

The benefits include:-

-Reduced fuel comsuption

-More power

-Reduced exhaust emissions (HC & CO)

-One treatment lasts for 400,000 kms

-Simply fitted and requires no maintenance

-Easier starting and smoother running

-Suitable for use with catalytic converters

-Keep engine oil cleaner

-Eliminates engine 'coking'

-Quickly pays for itself

-Allows the safe use of unleaded petrol in all petrol engines.

Basically there are 2 types;

a) Inline - which is placed along the fuel lines, before or after the fuel filter.

B) Intank - metal balls that sit inside the fuel tank.

The Particular units we'll be testing are the Broquet Intank & Inline units & Algae-X products. AlgaeX is a little different where it uses magnetics, and is more common on Diesel & Marine equipment, it has a similar effect, but is also claimed to "Condition" the fuel system including injectors, tank etc etc. So we asume this will be more a long term rather than immediate effect.

The test is planned for this Saturday, and will be done at ICE Performance on their dyno. I'll keep you'll updated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44309-test-results-fuel-catalyst-products/
Share on other sites

You should get a camera crew and sell it to today tonight or something.

At least get the story to pay for itself

Yeh.. good idea!! I doubt it though.

I still got to fork out $$ for the Dyno time. I know these have been covered before on ACA & TT, but nothing like seeing it for yourself.

dont they need to be run in so to speak. Ie at least 500kms before they start to work. So if u do a back to back dyno it will prolly show nothin, even thou they prolly dont work?

Yes & No! Both products have an immediate effect, but the AlgaeX has an additional product a liquid based "Fuel Catalyst" which is added to the tank, this takes around 2-3 fills to see any results.

I'll be interested to hear the results because the marketing & salespeople give me a really bad vibe about these products.

I think you will find that the manufacturers will do their best to distance your tests from their product if the results arn't positive. They will however ignore any inconsistancies in the testing if the results are good.

One manufacturer has a written statement that the type of test you are conducting (ie short term dyno tests) will not produce reliable results.

browny, it's going to hard for "Broquet" at least to distance themselves, as they will be present and participate in the run. The reason we are doing this, is because I was given a smaller unit to try about 3weeks ago, and found it to be slightly positive only by the "hard to prove"seat of your paints feel. It seemed to have reduced knocking which I monitored via the Apexi Power FC Hand Controller, response felt a little better, and ICE had the car on the dyno last week, where they found the AF Ratio's to be richer in the midrange. The problem with the current unit is we think it is restricting fuel flow and looking at the larger units or the intank units.

So far... it seems "OK" the claim of saving fuel???well I still get around 300Km out of a tank, so I can't say it helps with saving fuel. Broquet have been very helpful and stand by their claims on what this product can do. I guess we will see on tomorrow.

Allright... we did a some runs tonight on ICE's dyno. And sure there were a few "ok! maybe alot" of laughs about these "Stealth B52 Uranium Bombers"..and with possibly goods reason. It was best to be sure and dyno the units, than assume the hard to prove "seat of your pants feel"..

We tested all the units within a 2-3hour period tonight, doing around 4-5 runs per test with about 15-25minutes between each procedure, nigel was also wearing his "ear phones" to monitor knocking, and "just in case his girlfriend called to say dinner was ready" :P.

The test we did were:

1) Broquet B40 (retails $500 fitted) Unit connected between the fuel filter & engine to manufacturers specs.

2) Broquet Top Fueller Competition (retails $1200 fitted) Unit connected between the fuel filter & engine to manufacturers specs.

3) Non of the above, back to stock standard fuel line.

A couple of things, we generally spoke about, were maybe these units don't have the same effect on cars pushing higher HP running Premium ULP. In our tests it failed to show any conclusive difference, and we decide to return the car back to normal.

I will upload the graph tomorrow.

I hope you didnt have to pay for these to test them?

thanks for putting up the results.

Edit:

You mention perhaps they weren't meant for big HP cars, but by the sound of the name, and the cost, of the second unit you tried, it wasnt designed for hyundai excels used by old ladies:)

I have attached the dyno sheet.

The 3 test are as follows:

1) fuel check

This test is done without any fuel catalyst, with the cars fuel system returned to stock

2) big red check

Nige decide to call this test Big Red, coz the unit looks like a uranium bomb. This is the apparnent top of the range unit "Top Fueller" retailing for $1200. see pic below. It is supposed to handle upto 1000hp.

topfueller-pic.jpg

3) AFC Tune

This test was done using the B40 unit retailing for $500.

boostmaster-pic.jpg

I'm not too technical on the dyno graph reading etc etc, but on the advice of the boys, we concluded the unit had no real effect as claimed by the manufacturer.

I fairness to the monufacturer, they did say give the car around 3-5000Km and see if there is any difference without the unit...

Those AFRs are quite different between each run though..

Any reason for that?

If the computer was returned to suit the different conditions it might change the results somewhat?

Looks to be about 0.7 difference in the AFRs.

Would there be much difference in tuning it to this?

Sydneykid????

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...