Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well, you'd want to go with a brand new actuator, rather than something secondhand. You've probably all seen the pain and anguish that SR20 owners go through when their VTC actuators shit themselves. Nothing available 2nd hand because they fail so often, and new price ex-Japan + 3 week wait is not pleasant either.

You could possibly do something with a $2k budget and a new actuator included. You'd not be able to do it without a capable ECU though. So that would add cost for some people and stop others from doing it at all.

As long as the actuator is robust, such as the Neo one, I can't see why a second hand assembly can't be used. You don't see Neo's smashing valve gear...

The VCT window can be actuated by many products on the market can't it? Not a big task anyway.

Making sure you have the valve clearance would be the big stress.

As long as the actuator is robust, such as the Neo one, I can't see why a second hand assembly can't be used. You don't see Neo's smashing valve gear...

The VCT window can be actuated by many products on the market can't it? Not a big task anyway.

Making sure you have the valve clearance would be the big stress.

I thought all the talk was about using VQ style actuators to gain the full VCAM experience. If not, then using RB issue stuff would probably be OK. But then I would just save the pain and use a Neo head.

Someone needs to do the unmentionable and put a neo head on an rb26.

Higher comp and vct with e85 would be awesome.

There had been mention the neo head can suffer shim spitting at high revs but that can be sorted cheaper than fitting vct to a 26 head surely?

a switched set up wouldn't be hard, RB VCT solenoid and inlet actuator, tee the oil pressure sensor for oil feed, rpm activated switch. Hardest part would be blocking the oil feed for the front cam journal and routing and drilling for the solenoid in its place. You would want a TIG on hand just in case you drill in the wrong spot!

continual variable would be a challenge, since you need to add cam position sensors, a better solenoid (PWM), actuator and an ecu that not only has target cam position, but that can actually control it and do so within 10ths of a second

continual variable would be a challenge, since you need to add cam position sensors, a better solenoid (PWM), actuator and an ecu that not only has target cam position, but that can actually control it and do so within 10ths of a second

It's been done with a Haltech already, I am sure most high end ecu's could easily manage it. You would want a good tuner though.

Someone needs to do the unmentionable and put a neo head on an rb26.

done, Racepace, many moons ago. No E85 at the time though.

I have my HKS Vcam controlled by my Link, so no HKS electronics, it's a bit of a mongrel (like me! lol) but it's a sweet setup. There is a hall sensor to detect cam position.

I basically gave a bunch of parts to Trent and said "fix it fix it fix it!" :D

Ah, it was yours I was thinking of Daniel, I thought you had a Haltech for some reason.

I seem to remember Trent being worried about valve clearance, do you know what degree advance/retard you ended up getting out of it?

yes, obviously a lot of care was taken with that as Vcam was added post build.

I have the type a, step 1 or whatever the first 'stage' Vcam is as my pistons are supposedly N1's, so effective stock size (?), meaning advanced/retard options aren't maxed out to what the other Vcam options can do

Someone needs to do the unmentionable and put a neo head on an rb26.

Higher comp and vct with e85 would be awesome.

There had been mention the neo head can suffer shim spitting at high revs but that can be sorted cheaper than fitting vct to a 26 head surely?

There are at least two motors getting around that have had it done... and that was over 2 years ago now. So likely there are quite a few more now that have gone down this road.

From memory the hardest part is an adaptor to get the RB26 intake into the NEO.

So yeah, definitely not unmentionable or uncharted territory :D

There are at least two motors getting around that have had it done... and that was over 2 years ago now. So likely there are quite a few more now that have gone down this road.

From memory the hardest part is an adaptor to get the RB26 intake into the NEO.

So yeah, definitely not unmentionable or uncharted territory :D

Cool.

As usual someone has always done whatever is thought of!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi again all, I’ve tried doing some searching on the topic but couldn’t find the answer I’m looking for.   I deleted my clutch booster because it had an air leak and was squealing like a hog, and now my clutch has very poor pedal feel and the friction zone is way too small, so I believe I need a bigger diameter clutch master cylinder to compensate for not using the booster. I found a Wilwood option that’s 3/4” for a good price and will fit my 3AN clutch line, but all the firewall adapters I see online such as RB factory or Chase Bays are listed as RWD only (GTST/GTS). Link below. https://rbfactory.shop/products/nissan-to-wilwood-girling-clutch-master-cylinder-adapter My question is if these adapters will also fit a GTR, and if anyone has experience using a 3/4” CMC without the booster, my clutch is a Nismo coppermix twin plate.   Thanks, always appreciate the advice!
    • Catching up on a post, I've replaced the external shark fin with a small 4g antenna (no further drilling, just a 1mm embiggening of the existing hole, and run that to where the dual battery models have the battery in the left rear guard.  No idea what the factory antenna did, but removing it had no impact on anything I use, according to the US manual the GPS antenna is in the dash and it still works fine Also ended up stealing battery power from one of the amps and ACC power from a unit nearby to add an ACC relay to power it. The mounted the booster, wifi, power socket and antenna splitter in the rear left guard out of the way, all out of site with the boot trims in
    • What drama? The only drama you're going to have is the near constant work to maintain all those sphericals. I only have sphericals in my front caster rods and front upper CAs (because both of these are near compulsory in an R32). I have had the front arms out of my car 34 times already this month, and if the new replacements arrive today, I will have them out and apart again tomorrow. Chasing clicking and clunking that comes from sphericals being a.....poor choice for a road car. Moisture and dirt are not their friends. I have been contemplating a change to my rear subframe that would require me to use sphericals in my lower CAs. And.....I don't want to have them that close to the road.
    • Did you need anything else you've already done? If you had it before... and liked the changes after, then supposedly it'd be more of the same. The idea about most suspension arms is to tune geometry that the OEM arms max out at/can't handle because they weren't designed to have the car setup in such a way that 'looks good'.
    • I have replaced everything on my r34 including suspension to Miester R, all rear subframe bushes to poly, all arms to metal adjustable and same in front.   only thing I haven't touched is the front lower control arm. Should I? what improvement can i expect ? I mean the one on the link below?   Car drives perfectly, it is just me thinking everything is either puly bush or hard bearing type so should also do lower control arm front but do I really need it ? https://www.japspeed.co.uk/product/suspension/adjustable-arms/nissan-200sx-s13-s14-s15-skyline-r32-r33-r34-adjustable-suspension-front-lower-control-arms/?gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiAo5u6BhDJARIsAAVoDWs5V_PauQPf0kx3zFCaA4tOC9Q7JSIsfJWma_jAPN2f1sJA686djOwaAidgEALw_wcB
×
×
  • Create New...