Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've just recently purchased a Blitz i-Colour Spec-R boost controller. I have gone through the installation manual and I'm still a bit confused on how to Install it.

I have a twin turbo set up gt2860r -5.

Now my question is- Would I need to tap in a fitting for the hoses on the compressor hosing on both turbos?

There is a diagram In the manual. The solanoid Unit has a Out/In. (Out) T's off and goes to the valve on both actuators and (In) Looks like its T's off into both compressor housings.

Instead of taking off the turbos and tapping in fittings for the (In) is there another way?

Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/443426-dual-solanoid-for-gtr/
Share on other sites

You should take the boost signal to the gauge from the inlet manifold.

The line to the waste gates via the solenoid should be done as GTSBoy has said.

As per the diagram the blue line is the pressure source that should go to the new solenoid then waste gates.

Edited by Ben C34

The boost source is the green pipe labeled>

"To bottom of collector, boost source"

The blue pipe simply connects to the induction pipework ahead of the turbo inlets.

Good point . The blue is the return for the bled air back to the engine for emissions requirements. Can't vent anything to the atmosphere!

Note that the first part of this discussion uses the word "plenum" in the sense of the plenum on most cars, not the GTR. The multiple throttles are a complication. So in the above posts the term "inlet manifold" was used. I take that to mean "after the throttles" in the GTR. In any other RB the plenum is after the throttles.

For the purposes of driving a wastegate you want to measure the boost pressure upstream the throttle. If you measure it downstream the throttle then with a partially closed throttle you may have a situation where the pressure in the plenum is much lower than the target boost level but the pressure upstream the throttle is higher. This situation cannot continue indefinitely, but it can exist. At this time the EBC would be trying to close the wastegate to raise the boost (because it's measuring low) but in reality the turbo is pumping more pressure. Because the pressure at the turbo outlet is high but the flow is low (part closed throttle) then you may approach the surge line on the compressor map.

What you actually want is for the EBC to try to maintain the boost that the turbo is making at or less than the max boost you want, rather than allowing the turbo to spin away, effectively uncontrolled.

Now, I acknowledge that a partially closed throttle means that the power output of the engine is under the control of the driver and he is clearly asking for less than max power. It also means that the flow of exhaust gases is being modulated and is therefore less than you would have at WOT. But I think we can all appreciate that under these circumstances you would need a larger proportion of the exhaust flow to go out via the wastegate than the turbine. If the EBC is trying to raise the boost level in the plenum though, then the wastegate will be more closed than needed, meaning more flow through the turbine, meaning more compressor speed. So even with the concept of the driver's ankle being in control, there is a strong possibility of overdriving the turbo relative to what it needs. So we get back to the possibility of surge.

Whether the problem occurs or not may well come down to relative sizing of wastegate to turbine and matching of the exhaust side to the compressor side, which is a lot of variables to play with.

It's all avoided by hooking up the boost signal for the EBC from the turbo outlets.

In a GTR, the plenum is functionally equivalent to the turbo outlet relative to the throttle location, so long as the original throttles are still in use. Single TB conversions are the same as any other RB.

If, in the GTR, the original boost control solenoid is hooked up to the plenum, then that's fine. If it's hooked up to the inlet manifold (which would be the vacuum balance tube underneath) then that opens it all up to the problem I describe above.

Yup, if that connection is to the plenum itself.

In this case though, whilst it will be easier to do that (on the assumption that the standard location is there and available) you'd get better boost control response by keeping all the lines on one side of the engine. Shorter pipes means less pneumatic delay. The original GTR boost control system had to have one pipe go all the way around the engine. But in RB25s and so on, the boost control solenoid was right next to the turbo, for good reason.

FWIW though, the difference won't be terrible and would still work fine.

Instead of tapping fittings on the turbo compressor housing and going through all the trouble of taking out the turbos. I think I might just end up tapping fittings on both of the pipes that leads out from the housing Where all the decompression charge happens. Less parts to take off and easier. Thanks for your inputs.

I recent bought a Greddy Profec Boost Controller and was getting confussed on how to set it up because greddy instructions say to go off the fuel pressure regulator for a signal for the sensor unit. But reading different threads and watching Mighty Car Mods it seems to be a bad practice as you don't want to wreck this signal.

Below I have added my setup which im thinking of doing to my r33 gtr, Just wondering if it would work?

post-120471-0-34691200-1400673227_thumb.jpg

Greddy Setup

post-120471-0-85269500-1400673606_thumb.jpg

Thanks for your input and thanks Fat32gtr and everyone that has put input into this thread so far.

Do not confuse the boost source used for control with the boost source used for display.

The Profec, like most EBCs, is not a closed loop controller. If you look at the installation instructions carefully you will see that the boost signal line they recommend you connect to the FPR signal line is not involved in control at all. it is only the signal that goes to the MAP sensor in the Profec head unit, used for display of boost in the manifold. The actual control boost signal is drawn from the turbo outlet, as shown in their diagram, and the same as instructions given above.

There is very good reason for not tee-ing into the FPR signal line. if nothing goes wrong, then there is no problem. But if you tee in a nice long boost signal hose and it melts or splits or whatever, then you will have a nasty leak in the FPR sense line and your mixtures could go nastily out of control (ie, lean). Not desirable. I think Greddy only recommend that you tee the Profec MAP signal line into there because it is one place that the know will be available on every car that the Profec might get installed into. Saves having to describe a whole bunch of different possibilities for manifold tapping locations.

So for the sensor unit signal to supply the control unit can I tee into the factory boost line that supply the gauges inside the car.

And then in my drawing above not tee into the boost source line which go's from the solenoid to the plenum?

Um....yeah. The GTR is complicated. If you hook the sensor up to the plenum you will never read vacuum, because the vacuum is all on the other side of the throttles. So tee the sensor into the other existing boost gauge lines and you will have a true manifold pressure signal.

And the actuator control signal can come from the plenum but would be better coming from closer to the turbo outlets. Your choice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know this one’s the BB one. My tuner did make mention about the actuator. I am curious about the VCT as well
    • Might also needs a stronger actuator with the right preloading. With older 2019 built bush G3 units, BB upgrade or 21U housing down size makes a pretty decent gain in response as well. 
    • Hey lads  so im finally putting together my rb30 forged bottom end and ran into an issue. I measured my main bearing clearance with arp main studs torqued to 60 ft-lbs using ACL H series STD size bearings and standard, un-ground crank shaft journals and got an oil clearance reading of about 1.3 thou measuring straight up and down and about 2.8 thou measuring at a 45 degree angle (just above and below the parting line). My machine shop said they measured the main tunnel and it was all within spec (they didnt say the actual measurement) and to go with a standard size bearing, which i have done and the clearance is too tight, I'm guessing because of the extra clamping force from the arp studs distorting the main tunnel. I was wanting to run about 2.5 thou main bearing clearance.  My questions are: 1. could i just use the HX extra 1 thou clearance ACL bearings? that would fix my straight up and down clearance making it about 2.3 thou, but then would the side to side clearance be too big at around 3.8 thou? 2. what actually is the recommended main bearing clearance for measuring near the parting line / side to side. i know its supposed to be bigger as the bearing has some eccentricity built into it but how much more clearance should there be compared to the straight up and down measurement? at the moment there is about 1.5thou difference, is that acceptable or should it be less? 3. If i took the engine block + girdle back to the machine shop and got them to line bore the main tunnel (like i told them to do the first time, but they said it didnt need it) what bearing size would i buy? the STD size bearing shells already slide in fairly easily with no real resistance, some even falling out if i tip the girdle up-side-down. If im taking material out of the main tunnel would i need a bearing with extra material on the back side to make up for it? this is probably confusing af to read so if something doesn't make sense let me know and ill try explaining in a different way. My machine shop doesn't come back from christmas break until mid January, hence why i'm asking these questions here. TIA for any help or info 
    • I bought the model back in Japan in Feb. I realised I could never build it, looked around for people who could build it, turns out there's some very skilled people out there that will make copies of 1:1 cars or near enough. I'm not really a photo guy... but people were dragging me in a group chat for the choice of bumper as someone else saw the car before it was finished as they are also a customer of that shop. I took the photo in the above post because I was pretty confident that the lip would work wonders for it. Here's some more in-progress and almost-done pics. It gives a good enough idea as to what the rear looks like!   I have also booked in a track day at the end of January. Lets all hope that is nothing but pure fun and games. If it's not pure fun and games, well, I've already got half an engine spare in the cupboard 
    • Well, do ya, punk? Seriously though, let's fu<king go! The colour and kit looks amazing on the car. Do you have any shots from the rear? I don't quite follow how the model came around. You bought the white kit and he modified it to match your car? Looks nuts either way!
×
×
  • Create New...