Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My friend and I want cheap powerupgrades and we are thinking of undoing our exhaust and bringing a screwdriver/hammer to the honey comb and knock that f#*$& sh#*($ right out...

I heard there's a 10k Fine on this and a 10kw peformance upgrade... 1kw for 1 grand... lol

anyway, any comments/thoughts before we turn into clowns and perform this act

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44344-knocking-out-honeycomb/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

but it shoots flames..

damn straight!!! haha

if you really wanna hollow out your cat the best way to do it is to put a pipe through it...this will cause not turbulance & will also give the impression that it hasn't been hollowed out....unless you have to do an emissions test

The one on my RB20 180 was gutted, at was tested with the over rich stock ecu in and was told its fine and drive on... i dont think its a big deal if a few cars dont have them to be honest, seeing as how many race cars, bikes, trucks and everything else pollutes the atmosphere...

My friend and I want cheap powerupgrades and we are thinking of undoing our exhaust and bringing a screwdriver/hammer to the honey comb and knock that f#*$& sh#*($ right out...  

I heard there's a 10k Fine on this and a 10kw peformance upgrade... 1kw for 1 grand... lol

anyway, any comments/thoughts before we turn into clowns and perform this act

myself also being a fan of CHEAP power upgrades i so DO IT!

just buy another stuffed cat and keep the current one you have as a 'spare' in case you get epa'd and have to change it before an inspection...

knock it out and buy some 3" / 2.5" pipe from an exhaust shop and whack it in, held by some spot welds or something

honestly just look at the thing and if you can tell me its not going to be a restriction with a straight face then i'll................

Simply knocking out the honeycomb centre of a cat will probably result in less power, as the cat then becomes an expansion camber to help the exhaust gases slow down (takes time to fill the inside of the cat).

Replacing the cat with a straight through pipe, or fitting a straight through pipe (same dia' as rest of system) in the middle of it WILL result in more power. In the case of a turbocharged engine considerably more power!

Those of you who are all high and mighty about pollution of the environment, how often do you actually replace your cat? They have a very limited effective life. Once they begin to deteriorate the only thing they're good for is robbing power. NZ’ers don’t have to run cats at all – I'd rather breath the atmosphere in “Un zud” than Sydney!

The one thing ppls never mention is the general engine nore after gutting a cat. especially on a rb25 with a 3 1/2" exhaust

is the sound of the exhaust note. it is much angrier and clearer, althought ppls say it doesn't produce any additional power maybe true, but u want to produce the power as quick as u can not sometime this year.

Those of you who are all high and mighty about pollution of the environment, how often do you actually replace your cat? They have a very limited effective life. Once they begin to deteriorate the only thing they're good for is robbing power. NZ’ers don’t have to run cats at all – I'd rather breath the atmosphere in “Un zud” than Sydney!

Well I know my cat was replaced when my car got complied, so I'd say it's still functioning quite well. What I was trying to get at was that I think we should try and do our best to cause as little damage to the environment as we can (especially since we drive performance cars). Possibly gaining a few kW for removing something that is probably still functioning quite well is a pretty questionable move to me.

EDIT: Just thought I'd add this - Removing it for the track or dragstrip I can understand, as you want to get that slight advantage and get a lower time, but to have it off all time I just don't get it.

if gutting the cat makes no difference, then why do people claim to 'fell the difference' when they go to a 'high flow' cat which (from what i have interpreted) is just a normal cat flanges but with a greater volume inside?

it ain't any bigger in diameter it must be less restrictive..!

conclusion drawn by me: if high-flow cats make a difference then so does gutting the cat.

bring on the disagreements!

My old VL picked up 0rwkw also, I was told it was due to the cat not having a pipe welded through the center.

Its no good having that big hollow area where the gas has to fill then try to squeeze down again in to the diamater of the pipe. It creates back pressure.

+ it made a horrid tinny sound from the cat convertor after that, made the exhaust louder but there was no performance gain. I think thats maybe why it felt quicker but made no more power?!

I very much prefer the noise of a car with a CAT! :rofl:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all. Been a while but things are moving along. I just have something that I am wondering about. Since I will use OEM turbo oil pumbing, I got myself a new bolt, the one that goes into the engine block oil feed. As I recall (and see visually) this bolt comes restricted with I think a 1.7mm hole? Not quite sure but it was something around that size. The turbos have 1mm restrictor bolts installed, as necessary due to ball bearings and my higher oil pressures. Can I now just use that OEM bolt with the 1.7mm hole in for the engine block or will this actually be too much oil flow restriction and I have to drill it out first? In my head it would make sense for the bolt to be at least 2mm wide as both turbos take "1mm of oil flow". Do let me know if my logic is flawed here, I just want to make sure I don't kill my turbo bearings with too little oil. Don't know if I can trust the saying I read somewhere that ball bearing turbos essentially only need an oil mist
    • There are several aftermarket options available, from not-too-painful moneyhttps://justjap.com/collections/driveshafts-bearings/products/d-max-reinforced-replacement-rear-driveshaft-set-fits-nissan-s13-s14-s15-r32-r33-r34-c35 and  https://justjap.com/products/crank-motorsport-billet-rear-axles-fits-nissan-skyline-r33-gts-t-r34-gt-t?srsltid=AfmBOorQk4xkGUa98kO7v2ePLUiNt-HRrM2AwWNw9mbSIVE1ujBVwY__, all the way up to The Driveshaft Shop https://driveshaftshop.com/skyline-cv-axles/
    • Yeah based on old XRC5964S specs, it looks to be roughly GTX3576R sized? But this 5964S compressor will flow 90lb airflow somewhat similar to the compressors in both the GTX3584RS or G35-1050.. I fully expected the 0.64 rear A/R to choke up top - seems way too small from typical convention - but these are seemingly beneficial over the prior 0.82 results.. Be interesting to see if he comments on the EFR question in that thread - he mentioned in a prior video that BW EFR's were the "cats pajamas 10 years ago", but by the sounds of things all his kits have been using Xona for quite a while now.
    • Yeah it’s still got the oem manual gearbox and clutch, only kinda mods are a blow off valve, coil overs, and a aftermarket intercooler. Also had it for about 2 months now with a lovely midnight purple paint on it.
    • Yeeeppp, been following a lot of the testing on the latest Xona stuff and there are some mental results.  He also went over 1000hp @ 4 hubs on his Mainline with a XRE6364S (63mm) which was also well into the 20psi range before 4000rpm on a 2.5. Crazy stuff. Fwiw the XRE5964S is basically the modern equivalent of their old HTA3582 - would drive nicely enough on an RB25 or 26, but proven capable of a huge amount of power if you want to spicy with rpm tho even at sane boost levels will make stout numbers 
×
×
  • Create New...