Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Bob you'll need to specify the model.

There's pre 91, post 91 and N1.

Ok....... I need both pre and post 91's for my ADM and V-Spec2.... N1 not so important.

I know the High beams are the same H3's and the Low beams are H3c and H1 respectively but I want to know the wattage.

Thanks,

Bob.

The 85W bulbs are std....... I had it checked out with Nissan yesterday.

I bought some "you-beaut" Phillips globes as the cars going back to Unigroup on Monday and I figured they can throw them in for me but..............

In the box of goodies I got from the previous owner there is a pair of H11 globes and a pair of HB3's..........

I'm hoping that it's just a coincidence (and error) that he gave them to me as I can't see anywhere our cars taking these globes.

A post "91 car should be H1's and H3's and these are for my V-Spec 2.

This is what I bought, I couldn't get The H1's in 85W bar Nissan and I wasn't going to pay $77.00 for a pair!

I could get 100W but it's risky putting more load on the wiring.

I got these 55W but with extra 60% coverage according to the box! How often do I use high beam....... Not often.

Hopefully they all fit.

Bob.

post-78207-0-25292700-1401522558_thumb.jpg

post-78207-0-74985700-1401522563_thumb.jpg

Bob did Nissan check the factory fitment in Japan or the upgrade as fitted to the Aus model?

The Aus model had 85W fitted as part of the changes to suit our "challenging" driving conditions.

I've only seen 55W in my 32's, even the N1 has moderate wattage of 60/55W in their H4 bulbs.

Bob did Nissan check the factory fitment in Japan or the upgrade as fitted to the Aus model?

The Aus model had 85W fitted as part of the changes to suit our "challenging" driving conditions.

I've only seen 55W in my 32's, even the N1 has moderate wattage of 60/55W in their H4 bulbs.

Hmmm...... Good point....... My parts guy knows I have 2 cars but may well of quoted based on the ADM.

Maybe the later cars got this upgrade too?

I'll know more tomorrow after they hopefully fit what I will give them.

I'll let you know.

Bob.

I probably should have just looked in the owners manual instead of digging bulbs out of suspect headlight assemblies !!!

Well...... That's our answer well done........ I think. What does the 2 and 4 mean on the top two lines?

Thanks,

Bob.

My handbook is for all model Skylines and I think sedans had a combination headlight which used the H4, thus only 2-headlights.

My car has individual low beam lights and high beam lights, thus 4-headlights.

I can't read Jap, so I'm just guessing.

The next light below (with the H3 12v/55W) would be for the fog light.

But Bob your question is doing my head in.

Handbook says H1 on high beam.

To my knowledge R32 projectors use either a H1 or a H3C on low, but they all use a H3 on high??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, all the crude is used for fuels and petrochem feedstocks (pesticides, many other chemicals, etc etc). But increasingly over the last few decades, much of the petrochem synthessis has started with methane because NG has been cheaper than oil, cleaner and easier and more consistent to work with, etc etc etc. So it's really had to say what the fraction either way is. Suffice to say - the direct fuels fraction is not insigificant. Heavy transport uses excruciatingly large amounts. Diesel is wasted in jet heaters in North American garages and workshops, thrown down drill holes in quarries, pissed all over the wall to provide electricity to certain outback communities, etc etc. Obviously road transport, and our pet project, recreational consumption camouflaged as road transport, is a smaller fraction of the total liquid HC consumption again. If you're talking aboust Aussie cars' contribution to the absolute total CO2 production of the country, then of course our share of the cubic mile of coal that is used for power generation, metallurgy, etc adds up to a big chunk. Then there is the consumption of timber. Did you know that the production of silicon metal, for example, is done in Australia by using hardwood? And f**king lots and lots and lots of hardwood at that. Until recently, it was f**king jarrah! There are many such sneaky contributors to CO2 production in industry and farming. NG is used in massive quantities in Australia, for power gen, for running huge water pumps (like, 1-2MW sized caterpillar V16 engines running flat out pumping water) for places like mine sites and minerals/metals refineries. And there are just a huge number of those sort of things going on quietly in the background. So NG use is a big fraction of total CO2 production here. I mean, shit, I personally design burners that are used in furnaces here in Oz that use multiple MW of gas all day every day. The largest such that I've done (not here in Oz) was rated to 150MW. One. Single. Gas burner. In a cement clinker kiln. There are thousands of such things out there in the world. There are double digits of them just here in Oz. (OK< just barely double digits now that a lot of them have shut - and they are all <100MW). But it's all the same to me. People in the car world (like this forum's users) would like to think that you only have to create an industrial capability to replace the fuel that they will be using in 10 years time, and imagine that everyone else will be driving EVs. And while the latter part of that is largely true, the liquid HC fuel industry as a whole is so much more massive than the bit used for cars, that there will be no commercial pressure to produce "renewable" "synthetic" fuels just for cars, when 100x that much would still be being burnt straight from the well. You have to replace it all, or you're not doing what is required. And then you get back to my massive numbers. People don't handle massive numbers at all well. Once you get past about 7 or 8 zeros, it becomes meaningless for most people.
    • @GTSBoy out of the cubic mile of crude oil we burn each year, I wonder how much of that is actually used for providing petrol and diesel.   From memory the figure for cars in Australia, is that they only add up to about 2 to 3% of our CO2 production. Which means something else here is burning a shit tonne of stuff to make CO2, and we're not really straight up burning oil everywhere, so our CO2 production is coming from elsewhere too.   Also we should totally just run thermal energy from deep in the ground. That way we can start to cool the inside of the planet and reverse global warming (PS, this last paragraph is a total piss take)
    • As somebody who works in the energy sector and lives in a subzero climate, i'm convinced EV's will never be the bulk of our transport.  EV battery and vehicle companies over here have been going bankrupt on a weekly basis the last year. 
    • With all the rust on those R32s, how can it even support all the extra weight requirements. Probably end up handling as well as a 1990s Ford Falcon Taxi.
    • Yes...but look at the numbers. There is a tiny tiny fraction of the number of Joules available, compared to what is used/needed. Just because things are "possible" doesn't make them meaningful.
×
×
  • Create New...