Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I'm thinking about getting a Nissan maxima but the earlier model 2004 which has a 4 speed auto (not the later model with CVT tranny).

Interested to see if there are any owners on here and also opinions on this car? Should I shouldn't I?

The purpose of the car is for everyday driving.

Thanks.

Personally I would spend the 5.5k on a V6 VR/VS Calais or Statesman if I was after luxury.

You have the option of getting a manual transmission.

They are cheap to maintain and repair.

Spare parts are easy to get.

Great highway fuel economy.

More room inside than a Maxima.

Best of all they are RWD.

Just my opinion though. Test drive as many as you can and don't be talked into anything by pushy salesmen.

Edited by *LOACH*

Maxima is a nice comfortable car - towed a car trailer with my Stagea on it for 300km no problems.

What to look for with an high mileage one - check operation of auto trans.

I too am a fan of local cars due to cheap maintenance etc BUT I do like my jap cars as well. I was looking at a VZ SV6 which is also nice.

VL - best of both worlds. Nissan engine, local body :)

Glad you are keeping an open mind about what to get.

A few lessons I have learned after having owned more than 10 cars (note: this is entirely subjective):

I always sell performance cars for near to what I bought them for. I always lose money on boring cars.

I could often convince myself life would be in someway better if I owned only a boring car, however I always ended up wishing I had a performance car when I had a boring daily.

Having a boring daily and a performance car just means finding excuses to drive the performance car every day. I haven't tried it yet but I think the ideal situation would be to have at least 2 performance cars (in my case 2 VL wagons with turbo motors in them).

Having said all that, I don't really know you and you may have far more car experience than I do. Regardless,do what makes you happy.

Edited by *LOACH*
  • Like 1

after a handful of interesting cars i bought an a33 as needed something little more reliable/practical.

imo they're a good solid car, picked mine up around 90,000kms and did 50 or 60k in it without anything major crapping itself - all i did to it was upgrade audio and an eibach pro-kit

video of it here:

i haven't driven a J31 but they couldn't possibly have made it worse so the maxima gets my vote

200 clicks no problem:

post-66051-0-22136400-1401634936_thumb.jpg

I have 3 kids so the bigger car is more appealing and I'll be driving it everyday mainly Sydney metro but occasionally up and down the coast (I'm a BDM). We have a Forester XT which is the dedicated family car.

I have an automatic Ralliart Magna which is an 02 model and that is a lot of fun to drive, angry little thing.

Manual for everyday is no good for me as I'm on the phone and GPS etc

The attraction is that all the depreciation is done. So selling it later on might entice Camry lookers.

Let down might be the trans and stopping distance. Taking it over some speed humps might also reveal suspension tiredness? Pezhead took our old '97 Maxima around a Texi course with aplomb, but I don't know about how much understeer there'd be with a lesser driver - especially in the wet Marko.

The Maxima's are pretty underrated and plenty of car for the money. The engine is great, plenty of room, build quality is decent and its pretty decent to drive. My mate has one with 190k on the clock and its running strong as, and I just did a service on my mother in laws car with 120k. Main troubles with them are door locks and drivers side engine mount. The front shocks will also go around 120-140k. My main complaint would be overly soft suspension though, they really need a decent spring and shock combo

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...