Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I got myself a pair of R33 GTR wheels for my GTST with 245/45/17 on them.

They're snow/winter tyres since they came from Japan.

I like the size since the tyre diameter is 2cm more than the standard 205/55/16

It looks good I find and gives good riding comfort.

(have a lot of potholes and speed bumps here)

In your experience is 245/45 a good choice for your cars or gives 255/40 more control?

http://www.tacomaworld.com/forum/tirecalc.php?tires=245-45r17-255-40r17

Edited by Torques

Size won't cause wobbley-ness, probably something wrong with balance or the tyre itself. I like the run the widest tyres possible, but since you have a GTS-t, I'd look at the guard to tyre clearance. Slightly taller sidewall would help with ride, so I'd stick with 245.

Difference between 245 and 255 isn't much, the tyre design/construction/compound would make a bigger difference.

Um. Wat?

20mm extra diameter is not a good thing. Hello speedo error. Hello taller gearing.

For all that.....there's nothing wrong with 245/45 as a tyre size in itself. It is neither going to be much better or much worse than a 255/40 in any real way. You'd be hard pressed to feel the difference in grip, firmness, sidewall flex, traction....anything. The 255 would be the better choice just for being closer to the right size (rolling diameter), that's all.

If you leave them on there 'til they wear out, and you want to go for wider tyres that still retain some of the extra sidewall height, you could probably squeeze a 265/40 onto 9" rims on that car. Gains you a bit extra rubber on the road and half the extra sidewall you have now.

Alright,

Thanks .. I was just thinking since 255 and 40 profile has smaller side-walls it would make a a real world difference

(just by using the link I provided in my first post)

I have the 245 on right now and clearance wise it seems ok

Um. Wat?

20mm extra diameter is not a good thing. Hello speedo error. Hello taller gearing.

For all that.....there's nothing wrong with 245/45 as a tyre size in itself. It is neither going to be much better or much worse than a 255/40 in any real way. You'd be hard pressed to feel the difference in grip, firmness, sidewall flex, traction....anything. The 255 would be the better choice just for being closer to the right size (rolling diameter), that's all.

If you leave them on there 'til they wear out, and you want to go for wider tyres that still retain some of the extra sidewall height, you could probably squeeze a 265/40 onto 9" rims on that car. Gains you a bit extra rubber on the road and half the extra sidewall you have now.

Hi!

Speedo error seems no too bad.

(that's compared to the standard GTSTs)

Look here:

http://www.tacomaworld.com/forum/tirecalc.php?tires=205-55r16-245-45r17

And 3% longer gearing seems to be an option,

Here's how it looks at the moment:

post-33912-0-66675300-1402147787_thumb.jpg

Edited by Torques

I run 265's on the back on 9" rim. I'd like to give a comparison to other size tyres but the last time i ran different size tyres they were 32 GTR tires, about 225 wide and rather old. Also car was stock and I ditched them about 4 months after buying the car

If you want to wait till you wear the current tyres out, fair enough. But go the 265's if you wont run into any problems with rubbing. I think mine are 265/35's but cant say 100% and too lazt to walk 4m to the car :)

Also, winter tyres won't be so good in summer eh.

Haha ..

Actually these tyres are very soft and traction is horrible if not scary!

Makes for a good show though ;)

That's why I need to change them but they're okay for getting an idea about sizes / clearance

(since the whole debate)

Edited by Torques

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No intention of driving the car the way it's set up now, just wanting to make sure I haven't made any mistakes along the way so that the tune can go smoothly, I don't want to waste anyone's time with stupid issues. And of course I intend to get it towed to the dyno in a completed state 😅 I have the base fuel pressure with the vacuum disconnected set at about 40psi, which I believe is at least relatively close to stock fuel pressure, maybe I'll have a fiddle with the reg and see what happens. For all I know I could be wasting my time with this and I should just plumb it in and see what the tuner reckons. I just find it a bit strange that it seems to be under so much load just free revving, but maybe that's just a result of the turbo slowing down the exhaust gasses and making a restriction in the flow, with no boost to compensate.
    • The boy just hit up google translate and it worked a treat, he said step one was "please urinate with precision and elegance", he then sent me the correct translation  I get some new loctite for the small fixtures tomorrow and get some "dort" going after that 🤣
    • Right, so is the fuel pressure the same as it was previously? If not, well, it's not going to work well. I can understand the theory I assume you are going for, which is: "Run it N/A, and if I have the original AFM, and same amount of fuel and intake air as previously, the fact there's a turbo in my exhaust should still make it run" Which it... might? Provided you don't actually change how much air or fuel is going into the car.. or getting out. But if you have changed that, all bets are off. What is the purpose to even have the car run this way? To get it to a tuner? And if the goal is to limp it to a tuner, you're still going to what - plumb up a whole intercooler system and new intake in the parking lot out front before your tune......?
    • Haha yea it's a bit of a weird setup at the moment, just wanted to make sure I sorted out any headaches before dyno day. At the moment I've changed the exhaust manifold, turbo and downpipe, 460lph fuel pump and rising rate reg as well as the previously mentioned headstuds and gasket. The nistune was already mapped for the car as it was and drove around for a few months no worries. The plan is to run flex fuel hence the big pump, which I've wired direct to the battery through a relay to avoid voltage issues.
    • Um. Was the ECU the same as the one previously there? I know R33's needed R32 GTST ECU's or other tomfoolery to run Nistune. This is such a wild setup. Most people would plumb in the turbo then not drive the car (i.e tow it to a tuner). What's actually changed since it last ran?
×
×
  • Create New...