Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

i will be fitting a set of tomei type B poncams (260deg 9.15mm) to my rb25det neo soon, but im having a hard time finding suitable valve springs. Can anybody tell me if the standard valve springs are single or duel springs? will i need to change valve spring guides if i go from single to duel or vise versa?

Also what is the general consensus on reusing retainers, collets and cam hold down bolts?

  • 8 months later...

In the same boat as you. Have been told that the neo head can handle 22psi on pump fuel and 25 26 on e85. But if wanting to run more than 22psi I need to upgrade the spings. Have been told by a few people to stay away from profamance spings and go for supertech spings. Been having problems finding them tho.

why not just see how it goes on the dyno? pretty sure a lot of people have had no issues without even opening the motor..

worst case scenario is they start to valve bounce and you have to change them then a touch up tune??????

Edited by AngryRB

with the tomei type b's you run the risk of spitting a shim with standard springs. they wont float or do anything bad its just one of the things that CAN happen.

Tomei do a matching valve spring but Jap springs are rubbish.

Ring places like supertech about a spring to suit 25neo which is a shim over bucket (not shim under bucket like rb26) single spring with something like 64 pound seat pressure (least i think its 64 pound but that was a bulldog spring for some serious ramp rate cams so might be a bit overkill for you.

how do the springs know what psi is being given?

The pressure applied by boost to the back of the inlet valve is how they know. The more boost the more pressure trying to open the valve.

So running 20 psi adds 20 psi of opposing force to the spring being able to close the inlet valve.

As Mark says PSI is irrelevant - revs, power and cam profile will determine the need for new springs.

Just to add to my previous post, power makes no difference to valve spring requirements.

How does the valve know how much power its making?

Revs, cam profile and boost are basically the factors.

Notice how engines valve float but when boost is reduced can still rev cleanly to redline? The valve opens and shuts just the same when at max revs regardless of power output, the difference is how much boost acting against the inlet valve closing.

I ended up getting 'performance' springs, haven't installed them yet tho.. Isn't a big name brand but haven't heard anything bad about them plus aussie made so should be sufficient.

why not just see how it goes on the dyno? pretty sure a lot of people have had no issues without even opening the motor..

worst case scenario is they start to valve bounce and you have to change them then a touch up tune??????

Because I have to travel ~ 2000km return to a tuner, why not do it right the first time

As Mark says PSI is irrelevant - revs, power and cam profile will determine the need for new springs.

PSI is VERY relevant.

I can't see how power can make any difference seeing that both valves are shut when it goes "bang".

Boost pushing against the intake valve is a big contributing factor in float.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 😃
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
    • You talking about the ones in the photo above? I guess that could make sense. Fixed (but flexible) line from the point up above down to the hubcap thingo, with a rotating air seal thingo. Then fixed (but also still likely flexible) line from the "other side" of the transfer in the hub cap thingo up to the valve stem on the rim. A horrible cludge, but something that could be done. I'd bet on the Unimog version being fed through from the back, as part of the axle assembly, without the need for the vulnerable lines out to the sides. It's amazing what you can do when you have an idea that is not quite impossible. Nearly impossible, but not quite.
×
×
  • Create New...