Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Morning gents. So after finding a replacement o2 sensor for my m35 and installing it yesterday I thought I'd plug my nismo ecu in and see how she would run now with no error codes but still to my bitter disappointment she fired up running rough and then stalls I checked again for any error codes and nothing.

Any ideas as to why I wouldn't be running and stalling with the nismo ecu I'm scratching my head as ivegone over everything!! Thought it could be fuel related so checked fpr's fuel pump and for any leaks but nup all is good.

Please guys throw some help my way I'm dying to get this ecu in and running perfect

Edited by Lakes101
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/444358-help-with-my-nismo-ecu/
Share on other sites

I'm not at all familiar with the m35 nismo ECU....but in all other nissans I know of the nismo ECU it is just a modified standard ECU.

If it's the same, it is almost certainly a faulty ECU, nothing to do with the fact it is nismo modified or not.

It was running out of bricks car sweet and from what I've looked up nismo ecu's have just a default maps on them and are all the same.. Not like impul or the like.. If it is the case that it has a different map what would the suggestions be as to get the idle smooth and running right?

well if you know it was working in another car that is much easier. by far the most likely reason to not idle with a changed map would be different injector or AFM size but I guess you would know that already from the other car

It's my understanding that the NM35 Nismo ECU was a custom map, written for the specific vehicle it was fitted to. This is why we can't just buy a reflashed ECU from Nisan/Nismo to suit.

If you bought one from a car that had minimal mods; you're good to go on a local car built to a similar standard.

If however; you managed to get one from a more seriously modified car (larger injectors, higher fuel press, etc) you will essentially need to match the mods to achieve the same result.

I realise this doesn't really help you, but there is always risk inherent in purchasing stuff like this; most that I've seen, have been awesome, and a real improvement over stock, but there's always the chance of it not being perfect without mods first.

  • Like 1

I might have missed this, but is the car running properly with the standard ECU installed, ie just plays up with the Nismo?

What mods did Brick's car have when it came out & was it OK when he had it?

Yep runs perfect with the stock ecu just idles shit and stalls with the nismo well I'd idles ok but eventually stalls it sits about 550rpm for about 20 seconds in park then stalls.

I'm sure brick only had a highflow and fmic on his when he had it with the nismo ecu.

Firstly stick your stock ecu back in to make sure something hasn't gone wrong.

If that runs well then the only sure way to check the Nismo ecu is to put your car on a dyno and see what's going on.

Yep runs perfect with the stock ecu just idles shit and stalls with the nismo well I'd idles ok but eventually stalls it sits about 550rpm for about 20 seconds in park then stalls.

If you keep the revs above 650-700 via throttle position will it 'idle' longer? I'm wondering if a simple idle reset/relearn or idle rev increase via UpRev would fix it (if that is all that is wrong)?

I fail to see how having a hi-flow or not will make enough difference at idle.

Edited by Commsman

Yeah If I manually keep the revs up via the peddle it doesn't conk out. I've done the idle reset/relearn three times but to no evail. Plugged back in my stock ecu and all is well so I'm stumped as to what is leaning it out so much it even stalls if I have to break hard and revs drop to low which can be quite perilous in heavy traffic. Is the any.one that would be willing to let me plug it into there car and see how it runs?

You need to get a wideband up the exhaust, to see how rich or lean it's running. I suspect it was set up for larger injectors or something. If that's the case, you will need an Emanage or similar to adjust the fuel map.

It could have also been setup to run a Z32 afm or similar... It could even been MAP tuned, but I doubt it. Only the dyno could tell you, but without means to adjust it you can only throw parts at it to test I guess.

We're kind of talking in circles with this...

I feel sorry for you that you forked out a lot of money for it and it never worked good, that's the risk we take buying second hand stuff.

Now the only way you might ever get it to work is by doing what Scotty said and adding something else (piggyback ecu) that can adjust your maps. But we've suggested that several times before.

What you would like to happen and what needs to happen seem like different things, in not trying to be harsh bro, really I feel bad for you but that is keeping it plain and simple.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • In the context of cam 'upgrader' I mean generally people who upgrade headers/cams - not my specific change. I mean it makes sense that if I had a bigger cam, I may get more false lean readings. So if I went smaller, I'd get less false lean readings. To a point where perhaps stock.. I'd have no false lean readings, according to the ECU. But I'm way richer than stock. My bigger than normal cam in the past also was giving false rich leanings. It's rather odd and doesn't add up or pass the pub test. Realistically what I want is the narrowbands to effectively work as closed loop fuel control and keep my AFR around 14.7 on light sections of the map. Which is of course the purpose of narrowband CL fuel control. So if I can change the switch points so the NB's target 14.7 (as read by my WB) then this should be fine. Haven't actually tested to see what the changed switchpoints actually result in - car needs to be in a position it can idle for awhile to do that. I suspect it will be a troublesome 15 min drive home with lots of stalling and way too rich/lean transient nightmare bucking away for that first drive at 2am or whevener it ends up being. Hopefully it's all tune-able. Realistically it should be. This is a very mild cam.
    • Messing with narrowband switchovers is a terrible bandaid. I don't want to think about it. You are a cam "upgrader" only in concept. As you said, your new cam is actually smaller, so it's technically a downgrade. OK, likely a very small downgrade, but nevertheless. But the big thing that will be the most likely suspect is the change of the advance angle. That change could be equivalent to a substantial decrease in cam lobe duration. I haven't gone to the effort of trying to think about what your change would actually cause. But until someone (you, me (unlikely), Matt, someone else) does so and comes to a conclusion about the effect, it remains a possibility that that is the change that is causing what you're seeing.
    • The previous switchover point was 501mv. The stock value is like ~360. They now were idling at about ~880. The thing is, most people get a false lean condition. I am getting false rich conditions. This isn't a quirk of terminology, most cam upgraders get awful fuel economy because the O2's read false lean and add fuel - Mine are attempting to aggressively subtract fuel.
    • So... the whole idea was to upgrade the power of the motor from stock. The motor I bought with the gearbox had 'some' stuff done to it in the past, but it wasn't as well thought out/what I had wanted to do. The stock heads typically are a big restriction on LS's and need porting to unlock quite a lot of power. You can then go a bit silly with aftermarket castings to get more, aftermarket intake manifolds for a little more, and then porting those for more. <- We are here. Nobody in Australia really goes down this path (for some reason). It might* make 3kw or something more than doing things the tried and true path for 10X the cost. So that's probably why - I wouldn't even recommend it to people, the money was and is likely better spent on just CNC'ing the stock heads and putting a 6.3L stroker kit in. I didn't want to go down the 'normal' path and then think: But if I'd just done a bit more - I could have had a slightly better result. I assumed the heads were running out of flow and it always annoyed me - Turns out the previous installer advanced the cam 6 degrees so this is likely why it was coming on earlier and running out of puff earlier than advertised. The body panels were just lack of planning/no information on this anywhere on the internet and the fact they came out different was annoying. From test fitting the guard it appears I could have gotten away with GTR guards only, but I got the bonnet and raisers and everything else as well for a pretty decent package deal.
×
×
  • Create New...