Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

There are a few different wheel alignment machines out there the most common is the string type, the most accurate is the laser type and there is some ancient ones that rely on fixed head's that attach to the wheel from the hoist/ramp with dial guages and spirit levels.

I have been using the string type for about five years, have done thousands of alignments and they only need to be calibrated every few months with hardly and calibration needed.

The tires wear fine, though it doesn't do the side slip or thrust angle alignment it only does Camber, Castor, toe and SAI and you can do four wheel alignments with it too. First the vehicle is driven up onto a hoist or ramps that have swivel plates that sit under the front/rear wheels these allow for the wheels to be adjusted without the tires creating any resistance on the adjustments, then clamps are clamped to the wheel, some clamps need to have run-outs performed which require the wheel to be raised off the ramp and rotated and the machine checks for inaccuracies such as buckles or flat spots on the rim, others just clamp on and don't Require run-outs to be performed these are called quick clamps,then the heads are attached to the clamps,and they are leveled with spirit levels on them, careful that these aren't bumped otherwise calibration needs to be performed as they have sensitive sensors inside, then there are strings that are attached between the heads, there can be two heads or four, for a four wheel alignment there needs to be four heads otherwise the vehicle needs to be turned around and the steering wheel straighted and the clamps and heads to be set up on the rear after the front has been aligned, the machine is then turned on and the wheel size is entered into it, camber and toe is what they call live adjustments and just need the machine to be turned on to get the readings and adjustments can be monitored in real time, Castor is different requiring the steering wheel to be turned 20 degrees in each direction to get the readings and the readings aren't live meaning that after adjustments are made then the Castor sweep needs to be performed again to check readings.

The laser aligners have four heads that attach to each wheel but instead of strings that can be affected by wind they use the lasers, all adjustments are live ones and they are the most accurate of all the alignment machines, they can also measure the thrust angle, but can't measure the side slip, side slip is usually measured on a side slip meter, this looks like plates on the ground and the vehicle is driven over the top and the side slip is measured in a meter/kilometer reading, if you get a reading like 12m/km means that every kilometer the car travels the wheel would have moved sideways 12 meters if it was allowed to move freely, this is usually determined by the amount of toe in/out that the wheels have, these machine also give a instant toe reading as well, as these machines are a drive over machine you sometimes see them out the front of the service stations, some of these side slip meters also measure brake drag as well as brake efficiency.

If you want to know about Castor, Camber, Toe, SAI, Thrust angle, Scrub radius, Included Angle and set back then check out this site.

http://www.familycar.com/alignment.htm

MEGA

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44472-wheel-allingments/#findComment-909215
Share on other sites

there is also a place i went to that had a computer alignment, stick your car on rollers, and the computer rolls your wheels figuring out what the camber/castor/toe is etc...

Yes but these aren't as accurate as the laser or the string type, and like the side-slip meters should only be used as a pre-wheel alignment to check to see if there is a need for a wheel alignment, as they are basically a big diagnostic tool.

They do not take into account inaccuacys in the tires such as flat spots and uneven tyre wear aswell as buckles in the wheels.

MEGA

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44472-wheel-allingments/#findComment-909480
Share on other sites

yeah i was thiniking that, they said it was all that because it took readings with your wheel turning etc... and the other laser/string type aren't as good...

but pfft

Sorry Ferni, actually they do take into account the buckles in the rims but not the inconsistencies in the tires.

All vehicles over a certain age or mileage should have some sort of suspension/front end check for excessive play in joints and wheel bearings before a wheel alignment is performed.

Any joint with excessive play should be replaced other wise the wheel alignment won't be as accurate and even after the alignment may wear tires prematurely, cause bad fuel economy/performance on the road and tire the driver if they have to fight the pulling effect caused by a bad alignment, not to mention the safety factor.

MEGA

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44472-wheel-allingments/#findComment-909496
Share on other sites

Since I've had 265's put on the rear It seems as though I have some 'Toe in' on the rear, is this a normal thing for lowered 33's?

I also get steering vibrations above 115, but only had an allignment 4 weeks ago. So I am wondering whether some of my suspension bits are getting a bit long in the tooth?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44472-wheel-allingments/#findComment-910182
Share on other sites

Since I've had 265's put on the rear It seems as though I have some 'Toe in' on the rear, is this a normal thing for lowered 33's?  

 

I also get steering vibrations above 115, but only had an allignment 4 weeks ago. So I am wondering whether some of my suspension bits are getting a bit long in the tooth?

Shane, your vibrations have more to do with the wheel balance than the wheel alignment, the only ones that I have seen that suffer from vibrations at 100k's from a wheel alignment is the nissan patrol and landcruiser four-wheel drives, as they tend to suffer from a lack of castor though these need special bushes fitted to twist the front diff to achieve this.

Get your wheels computer balanced as this is relatively cheap at tyre shops and most probably fix your problem.

and yes usually if you lower the ride height on a car with independent rear suspension then the wheels will toe in and camber will increase into the negative, the toe can be adjusted just with a wheel alignment but the camber needs adjustable upper arms to be fitted to the skylines because the factory didn't fit them from standard.

Lowered cars without adjusters tend to wear the inside of the tyres on the rear, sometimes they tend to give it a bit more toe in to counteract this and even the tyre wear out, as toe in will wear the outside of the tyre, but this isn't the best way as your car should have a max of 2mm toe in on the rear.

MEGA

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44472-wheel-allingments/#findComment-912051
Share on other sites

Mega is pretty much spot on, except that you can also buy offset bushes to fix the camber problem. You don't have to buy a complete adjustable arms, plus the bushes cost less. Adjustable arms also usually have spherical joints which are not a good idea on a road car as they wear fast and rattle lots.

Hope that helps

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44472-wheel-allingments/#findComment-912557
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's excellent but I'm still breaking it in so I'm not 100% sure where it'll end up. I would say it's about 15% heavier than stock and the smoothness of the slip zone is quite progressive but you need to be a little patient compared to stock or it'll bite hard and stall. Stock I got away with absolutely horrid clutch control. Like I said before I couldn't even tell where the clutch would grab when it was stock so releasing way too quickly without enough revs it would just slip and the revs would drop lower than ideal but that would be the end of it. Currently there's a bit of a nasty clutch judder if I don't apply enough revs + find the exact wrong point of the slip point in the clutch pedal but it feels like it's slowly resolving as I drive it more. I would not recommend the competition clutch unless you really need the extra clamp force. I think this clutch combined with the Nismo operating cylinder is going to be exactly what I want. Enough bite that you need to remember the release point to avoid stalling or rough shifts, but progressive enough that it's not hard to drive by any means and not heavy at all. I tried a "super single" clutch on my friend's 997.2 Turbo 6MT and that was absolutely horrid. It runs an electrohydraulic power steering pump for the clutch power boost so there's zero feedback in the clutch pedal and there was a horrific clutch shudder well after break-in due to the lack of marcel springs or hub springs in the friction disk. It felt like the slip zone was the thickness of a single toe twitch as well so it was almost impossible to avoid stalling it unless you gave it a ton of revs and just dumped the clutch instead of trying to be smooth with it. I was terrified of pulling out in front of traffic. I have also tried some kind of "super single" on an EK9 and that makes this twin plate Coppermix look like a stock clutch. Releasing the clutch pedal even slightly too quickly feels like you're getting rear-ended. The pedal is extremely heavy as well and there's no vacuum assist like the GTR.
    • Yeah, well I was probably way underguessing the $300 figure anyway. Just multiplied a "normal" by 4 for the purposes of pointing out it's not cheap, particularly if it has to be repeated.
    • We have an alignment shop out here that does what you're talking about but he wants like 800 AUD a pop. DIY is "cheaper" but once you start accounting for the value of your time I'm not sure it's worth it.
    • The main catch phrase for any car is "the eye of the beholder", and "personal tastes and preferences" And as for the plastic "flares", I honestly think they look cheap and tacky, and I cannot see them aging well, maybe if they were body colour they might look better to my eyes, but, I would still prefer it the were more like the older WRX STI models that had the wider body metal panels In saying all this 5hit, I wouldn't buy a new WRX again, even if it had the wide body metal panels    
×
×
  • Create New...