Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The other thing to look at is -5s on a 2.6 will come on later in the rev range so the motor will disapate the boost better meaning you can get away with a higher CR, also what cams are you planning on cause same goes there, the bigger duration the higher CR you can use

Round ones LOL!!! :D

These ones

post-36620-0-69992500-1403582118_thumb.jpg

The other thing to look at is -5s on a 2.6 will come on later in the rev range so the motor will disapate the boost better meaning you can get away with a higher CR, also what cams are you planning on cause same goes there, the bigger duration the higher CR you can use

Round ones LOL!!! :D

These ones

attachicon.gifimage.jpg

Square piston engine?

http://thekneeslider.com/the-hossack-engine-a-square-piston-two-stroke/

ba ha ha ha h///

If you consider the Mine's car, that ran 2.6L with 2530's (slightly more responsive to the -5's). Maybe look at what compression/specs it had. I know the videos were based on the fancy diff but still a hell of an engine.

... that was ALOT of fine development, the kind of r$d that costs a lot for minimal results, but in that case the multiple of minimal results, resulted in a very cohesive package.

... static CR would only have been one small part of it.

- for my thought's on 98, I'd prefer the 'buffer' of 8.XXX:1 rather than 9.XXX:1 with -5's. Just for that bad batch of fuel, hot day etc variables. the few hundred rpm difference in boost threshold is worth the extra safety margin for me in a street-able car on 98 with low mounts.

- at the end of the day it's probably much the muchness depending on who and how hard it's tuned.

J.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...