Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Even the OP has stated that it is exhibiting both. I'm no suspension engineer, but you can see and hear that the car has corner entry and some mid corner understeer. And it seems like most of the oversteer is at corner exit. I think a more neutral setup will help alleviate both. But I agree with Neil, by making small changes, I think a lot could be gained. Such as some wheel alignment tweeks i.e. Some more positive caster up front or adjusting the ride height.

I am going to peg rear camber back to about 1 degree if this fixes the rear end grip then maybe i can adjust sway bars to reduce understeer (softer in the front or harder in the back although the links on the whiteline kit seem to only fit in some positions)

I use the standard factory sway bar links and have had the same problem trying to get them to fit the rear holes on the sway bars. Now I know the front ones are side specific and looking at them I think if you use right for left and visa-versa you can access the other holes. Not sure on the rears but give me a couple of days and I'll confirm it.

Cheers

Neil.

Yeah there is definitely some corner entry understeer and mid corner to exit oversteer. To me personally it feels like the oversteer is more the limiting factor because i cant step on the gas more to increase corner speed and exit speed.

However the entry understeer will be next on my list if i can dial out the oversteer by improving contact patch in the rear then i will work on sway bars and maybe some toe out in the front as suggested.

Have also been doing some reading on this site, very informative.http://turnfast.com/tech_handling/handling_tuningtable

I use the standard factory sway bar links and have had the same problem trying to get them to fit the rear holes on the sway bars. Now I know the front ones are side specific and looking at them I think if you use right for left and visa-versa you can access the other holes. Not sure on the rears but give me a couple of days and I'll confirm it.

Cheers

Neil.

Interesting please do let me know. I believe there was also a beefed up end links kit i did wonder if you had to get that to get all the adjustment.

Yea but your only running a 2 hole adjustable sway bar,,,I'm of the belief we are talking about the 4 hole puppies which for the links is a different situation all together. Your link is way badly bent and in my opinion would never fit our back 2 holes.

Here's 2 pics of mine and the same sided links will not adjust to the 2 rear holes. We might have to make rose jointed links to make it all fit properly,,,but I will on the weekend work some of it out and post my conclusions.

post-29-0-66844300-1403781386_thumb.jpg

post-29-0-17969800-1403781411_thumb.jpg

Cheers

Neil.

Set your centre of wheel to guard height at 340-350 mm. Make sure your bump stops are half the height of std.

Your wheel alignment is way to neutral. Toe out the front to 3mm or so (you may want more) and toe the rear in 1 mm as this will even out on acceleration. You might also find that with these settings and the correct tyre pressure you could stiffen your front bar.

Your set up is very similar to mine, and should be a lot more stable on the turn in and exit.

As Neil said make small changes write them down and keep a log of your opinions of the changes and cars feedback so you have history.

Enjoy.

Even the OP has stated that it is exhibiting both. I'm no suspension engineer, but you can see and hear that the car has corner entry and some mid corner understeer. And it seems like most of the oversteer is at corner exit. I think a more neutral setup will help alleviate both. But I agree with Neil, by making small changes, I think a lot could be gained. Such as some wheel alignment tweeks i.e. Some more positive caster up front or adjusting the ride height.

sounds like its just too high and being a boat :rofl:

Bump steer front and rear. I agree with an earlier comment about this.

Those pretty LCA and tie rod ends don't show true perspective but if they're running on different planes then it's going to do silly things as the suspension goes through its travel range.

Same thing goes for the rear.

Yea but your only running a 2 hole adjustable sway bar,,,I'm of the belief we are talking about the 4 hole puppies which for the links is a different situation all together. Your link is way badly bent and in my opinion would never fit our back 2 holes.

Here's 2 pics of mine and the same sided links will not adjust to the 2 rear holes. We might have to make rose jointed links to make it all fit properly,,,but I will on the weekend work some of it out and post my conclusions.

attachicon.gifpic164_01.jpg

attachicon.gifpic165_01.jpg

Cheers

Neil.

Mine is set to second softest of the 4 on the front i can move it one more adjustment forward. I cant access the front most or rear most.

Set your centre of wheel to guard height at 340-350 mm. Make sure your bump stops are half the height of std.

Your wheel alignment is way to neutral. Toe out the front to 3mm or so (you may want more) and toe the rear in 1 mm as this will even out on acceleration. You might also find that with these settings and the correct tyre pressure you could stiffen your front bar.

Your set up is very similar to mine, and should be a lot more stable on the turn in and exit.

As Neil said make small changes write them down and keep a log of your opinions of the changes and cars feedback so you have history.

Enjoy.

Cheers for that i will measure it up tonight so you can all have a laugh!

Should i cut down the standard bump stops?

Bump steer front and rear. I agree with an earlier comment about this.

Those pretty LCA and tie rod ends don't show true perspective but if they're running on different planes then it's going to do silly things as the suspension goes through its travel range.

Same thing goes for the rear.

Hopefully lowering will fix this when i originally set the ride height i did notice the arms were on a slight upwards angle from the wheel to chasis. I assume that level is optimal.

Unfortunately the car came with a fiberglass bumper. Nice and light but it protrudes quite far out the front and actually slants forward so the lowest point is right at the front edge not towards the wheels as with the standard bumper.

The further away (lower) from standard ride height, the more pronounced rear bump steer becomes.

It is countered by installing and adjusting rear adjustable links - the forward/upper ones sometimes referred to as "traction arms".

I never had a bump steer issue and front of my car was lower than most...I had bump stop issues, but not bump steer...

My car had Stock swaybars, all stock suspension arms, bilstein suspension...camber 3 and 1.5 just from lowering, toe set pretty much neutral, I think 1 degree of caster..17 x8,9 and 245/40, 255/40 tyres...It always handled great and exceeded my expectations..I know some people are doing quick laptimes with much the same setup too but better brakes and bigger balls...

my next step was sways bars and some extra caster, but I didnt see the need to do much more to it, it was simple and it worked...Not to stiff, not too soft..

The new owner said he has some issues with the front being too low, because he lives in the bush and has crappy roads though..guess it depends where you drive most and how good the roads you drive on are...But on the track and around Melbourne I never had an issue and my crossmemebr was maybe 120mm off the ground...I know it was just above legal height anyway..

OP was complaining about oversteer hence the comments about rear end adjustments and ride height.

Depending on what is fitted/changed (or not) it is possible to achieve bump steer ie. dynamic toe change as the suspension goes up/down at either end. Altered ride height does affect things.

Open to conjecture but I'd be looking into it if I was the OP. Harry was onto it early in this thread. Investigating and/or fixing it may mean having someone do it for him if he's not sure how.

With those spring rates I would be dropping the rear sway bar off totally. If it does roll a little then stiffen up the front bar, though I doubt it will.

Run about -1.0 rear camber with about 3-4mm toe in overall.

There is also an inherent flaw in the rear end design of the r33's when the tire travels from a drooped state to loaded state, the toe essentially becomes dynamic rather then staying at what you set it too statically when doing a wheel alignment.

  • Like 2

With those spring rates I would be dropping the rear sway bar off totally. If it does roll a little then stiffen up the front bar, though I doubt it will.

Run about -1.0 rear camber with about 3-4mm toe in overall.

There is also an inherent flaw in the rear end design of the r33's when the tire travels from a drooped state to loaded state, the toe essentially becomes dynamic rather then staying at what you set it too statically when doing a wheel alignment.

Interesting regarding dropping the rear sway bar, I will see how i go this weekend maybe drop of if the rear camber hasn't made a big difference.

Car is set to 340mm front and rear. Alignment set as follows:

Camber front -3.1 deg

Toe front -2.8 total

Camber rear -1 deg

Toe rear 2.5mm total

Running a test day this Sunday at Pukekohe, will post up the results next week.

What are your thoughts on removing vs adding weight into the rear. Is this going to increase or decrease oversteer. Ie if i leave my spare tyre in.

With those alignment settings you usually want 2-4mm toe out on the front, are you saying have 2.8mm of toe out or toe in?

Honestly at this level, dont worry about weight balance yet. If it was me I would be just pulling all the weight I can out to reduce overall weight. R33's are not the best circuit car, they are heavy and cumbersome....but they are fun!

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 馃槓
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
  • Create New...