Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Even the OP has stated that it is exhibiting both. I'm no suspension engineer, but you can see and hear that the car has corner entry and some mid corner understeer. And it seems like most of the oversteer is at corner exit. I think a more neutral setup will help alleviate both. But I agree with Neil, by making small changes, I think a lot could be gained. Such as some wheel alignment tweeks i.e. Some more positive caster up front or adjusting the ride height.

I am going to peg rear camber back to about 1 degree if this fixes the rear end grip then maybe i can adjust sway bars to reduce understeer (softer in the front or harder in the back although the links on the whiteline kit seem to only fit in some positions)

I use the standard factory sway bar links and have had the same problem trying to get them to fit the rear holes on the sway bars. Now I know the front ones are side specific and looking at them I think if you use right for left and visa-versa you can access the other holes. Not sure on the rears but give me a couple of days and I'll confirm it.

Cheers

Neil.

Yeah there is definitely some corner entry understeer and mid corner to exit oversteer. To me personally it feels like the oversteer is more the limiting factor because i cant step on the gas more to increase corner speed and exit speed.

However the entry understeer will be next on my list if i can dial out the oversteer by improving contact patch in the rear then i will work on sway bars and maybe some toe out in the front as suggested.

Have also been doing some reading on this site, very informative.http://turnfast.com/tech_handling/handling_tuningtable

I use the standard factory sway bar links and have had the same problem trying to get them to fit the rear holes on the sway bars. Now I know the front ones are side specific and looking at them I think if you use right for left and visa-versa you can access the other holes. Not sure on the rears but give me a couple of days and I'll confirm it.

Cheers

Neil.

Interesting please do let me know. I believe there was also a beefed up end links kit i did wonder if you had to get that to get all the adjustment.

Yea but your only running a 2 hole adjustable sway bar,,,I'm of the belief we are talking about the 4 hole puppies which for the links is a different situation all together. Your link is way badly bent and in my opinion would never fit our back 2 holes.

Here's 2 pics of mine and the same sided links will not adjust to the 2 rear holes. We might have to make rose jointed links to make it all fit properly,,,but I will on the weekend work some of it out and post my conclusions.

post-29-0-66844300-1403781386_thumb.jpg

post-29-0-17969800-1403781411_thumb.jpg

Cheers

Neil.

Set your centre of wheel to guard height at 340-350 mm. Make sure your bump stops are half the height of std.

Your wheel alignment is way to neutral. Toe out the front to 3mm or so (you may want more) and toe the rear in 1 mm as this will even out on acceleration. You might also find that with these settings and the correct tyre pressure you could stiffen your front bar.

Your set up is very similar to mine, and should be a lot more stable on the turn in and exit.

As Neil said make small changes write them down and keep a log of your opinions of the changes and cars feedback so you have history.

Enjoy.

Even the OP has stated that it is exhibiting both. I'm no suspension engineer, but you can see and hear that the car has corner entry and some mid corner understeer. And it seems like most of the oversteer is at corner exit. I think a more neutral setup will help alleviate both. But I agree with Neil, by making small changes, I think a lot could be gained. Such as some wheel alignment tweeks i.e. Some more positive caster up front or adjusting the ride height.

sounds like its just too high and being a boat :rofl:

Bump steer front and rear. I agree with an earlier comment about this.

Those pretty LCA and tie rod ends don't show true perspective but if they're running on different planes then it's going to do silly things as the suspension goes through its travel range.

Same thing goes for the rear.

Yea but your only running a 2 hole adjustable sway bar,,,I'm of the belief we are talking about the 4 hole puppies which for the links is a different situation all together. Your link is way badly bent and in my opinion would never fit our back 2 holes.

Here's 2 pics of mine and the same sided links will not adjust to the 2 rear holes. We might have to make rose jointed links to make it all fit properly,,,but I will on the weekend work some of it out and post my conclusions.

attachicon.gifpic164_01.jpg

attachicon.gifpic165_01.jpg

Cheers

Neil.

Mine is set to second softest of the 4 on the front i can move it one more adjustment forward. I cant access the front most or rear most.

Set your centre of wheel to guard height at 340-350 mm. Make sure your bump stops are half the height of std.

Your wheel alignment is way to neutral. Toe out the front to 3mm or so (you may want more) and toe the rear in 1 mm as this will even out on acceleration. You might also find that with these settings and the correct tyre pressure you could stiffen your front bar.

Your set up is very similar to mine, and should be a lot more stable on the turn in and exit.

As Neil said make small changes write them down and keep a log of your opinions of the changes and cars feedback so you have history.

Enjoy.

Cheers for that i will measure it up tonight so you can all have a laugh!

Should i cut down the standard bump stops?

Bump steer front and rear. I agree with an earlier comment about this.

Those pretty LCA and tie rod ends don't show true perspective but if they're running on different planes then it's going to do silly things as the suspension goes through its travel range.

Same thing goes for the rear.

Hopefully lowering will fix this when i originally set the ride height i did notice the arms were on a slight upwards angle from the wheel to chasis. I assume that level is optimal.

Unfortunately the car came with a fiberglass bumper. Nice and light but it protrudes quite far out the front and actually slants forward so the lowest point is right at the front edge not towards the wheels as with the standard bumper.

The further away (lower) from standard ride height, the more pronounced rear bump steer becomes.

It is countered by installing and adjusting rear adjustable links - the forward/upper ones sometimes referred to as "traction arms".

I never had a bump steer issue and front of my car was lower than most...I had bump stop issues, but not bump steer...

My car had Stock swaybars, all stock suspension arms, bilstein suspension...camber 3 and 1.5 just from lowering, toe set pretty much neutral, I think 1 degree of caster..17 x8,9 and 245/40, 255/40 tyres...It always handled great and exceeded my expectations..I know some people are doing quick laptimes with much the same setup too but better brakes and bigger balls...

my next step was sways bars and some extra caster, but I didnt see the need to do much more to it, it was simple and it worked...Not to stiff, not too soft..

The new owner said he has some issues with the front being too low, because he lives in the bush and has crappy roads though..guess it depends where you drive most and how good the roads you drive on are...But on the track and around Melbourne I never had an issue and my crossmemebr was maybe 120mm off the ground...I know it was just above legal height anyway..

OP was complaining about oversteer hence the comments about rear end adjustments and ride height.

Depending on what is fitted/changed (or not) it is possible to achieve bump steer ie. dynamic toe change as the suspension goes up/down at either end. Altered ride height does affect things.

Open to conjecture but I'd be looking into it if I was the OP. Harry was onto it early in this thread. Investigating and/or fixing it may mean having someone do it for him if he's not sure how.

With those spring rates I would be dropping the rear sway bar off totally. If it does roll a little then stiffen up the front bar, though I doubt it will.

Run about -1.0 rear camber with about 3-4mm toe in overall.

There is also an inherent flaw in the rear end design of the r33's when the tire travels from a drooped state to loaded state, the toe essentially becomes dynamic rather then staying at what you set it too statically when doing a wheel alignment.

  • Like 2

With those spring rates I would be dropping the rear sway bar off totally. If it does roll a little then stiffen up the front bar, though I doubt it will.

Run about -1.0 rear camber with about 3-4mm toe in overall.

There is also an inherent flaw in the rear end design of the r33's when the tire travels from a drooped state to loaded state, the toe essentially becomes dynamic rather then staying at what you set it too statically when doing a wheel alignment.

Interesting regarding dropping the rear sway bar, I will see how i go this weekend maybe drop of if the rear camber hasn't made a big difference.

Car is set to 340mm front and rear. Alignment set as follows:

Camber front -3.1 deg

Toe front -2.8 total

Camber rear -1 deg

Toe rear 2.5mm total

Running a test day this Sunday at Pukekohe, will post up the results next week.

What are your thoughts on removing vs adding weight into the rear. Is this going to increase or decrease oversteer. Ie if i leave my spare tyre in.

With those alignment settings you usually want 2-4mm toe out on the front, are you saying have 2.8mm of toe out or toe in?

Honestly at this level, dont worry about weight balance yet. If it was me I would be just pulling all the weight I can out to reduce overall weight. R33's are not the best circuit car, they are heavy and cumbersome....but they are fun!

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Rotisserie is fully assembled apart from centre connector which obviously isn't required until the car is on it. It packs away fairly neatly and doesn't take up too much room. (Now that I actually have some room after my clean up!) Overall very happy with the quality of it.  Assembly was a piece of piss.  The only thing I didn't like was that the pins that lock the rotation lock wheels in place were a bit of a dick in a bucket scenario. It allowed the arms to rotate a significant amount even when locked in place.  To fix that i measured up the hole and went and grabbed a couple of 18mm fully threaded bolts and a thread tap to suit. I ran the tap through top and bottom so it was threaded both ends.  Then just threaded the bolt through both sides.  It has made a massive difference which hopefully you can tell in the before and after video how much difference it made. 20250207_161431.mp4   20250207_161431.mp4 Hopefully back working on the car over the next few weeks.   20250207_162801.mp4
    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
×
×
  • Create New...