Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

FP does an alternate compressor housing for the 3076HTA , I think its a Mitsubishi based one they use when the T04S one is too big .

I was under the impression that turbos with the S or "GT35" compressor housing fitted if you use enough spacing on the standard manifold . Isn't someone running around with a GT3582R on a std manifold RB25 ? Happy to be corrected but that's what I thought .

A .

  On 14/07/2014 at 2:45 AM, discopotato03 said:

FP does an alternate compressor housing for the 3076HTA , I think its a Mitsubishi based one they use when the T04S one is too big .

I was under the impression that turbos with the S or "GT35" compressor housing fitted if you use enough spacing on the standard manifold . Isn't someone running around with a GT3582R on a std manifold RB25 ? Happy to be corrected but that's what I thought .

A .

Possibly... :ermm:

Angry rb: is that a gt3076 or does it have the gt35 compressor housing pn it?

If a low mount hta3076 can't be done then I will go with the high mount single scroll t3 1.01

Why doesn't forced performance offer a 1.01 ar turbine housing? Only upto .83

I think 34GeeTeeTee was saying FP don't do TS - though I am assuming you will be just getting the Garrett T3 housing, either supplied through FP or otherwise.

As a caveat - I don't know of anyone, or many who have tested the Garrett T3 TS housings so it's hard to know what flow etc to expect from them, I haven't actually seen turbine flow maps for them so I am cautious about saying what exactly to expect with them. Actually... I might have a dig and see if they have released anything.

If they do line up well, then a TS HTA3076 on an RB25 would make a complete monster of a thing - I suspect.

<edit: They don't appear to have released maps for them, bummer>

  On 14/07/2014 at 5:50 AM, BlackBox said:

Still can't seem to get a turbine housing bigger than .83 on the fp3076 so would have to be purchased separately?

The idea of mounting onto the factory manifold is very appealing, any more info on this?

I wouldn't go bigger than .82 in single scroll - just to be clear, Garrett do different numbers for their single scroll and twin scroll T3 sizes. The single are .63, .82 and 1.06 and the twin are .61, .83 and 1.01. The .82 would be the go with single, just NORMALLY it seems that to get equivalent performance from a twin scroll housing you go up a size - but that's a sweeping assumption and will really depend on the design as well

AFAIK if you can fit a GT3582R on the standard manifold you can fit a GT3076 HTA because dimensionally they are the same .

FP have an alternative compressor housing which you can see if you go to their site . I think its based on a TC06 housing and is port shrouded . If serious email them and ask if it makes any notable difference with this housing .

A .

Edited by discopotato03

Go back to the site and look in the Lancer Evolution/Diamond star or Subaru sections and open the FP Turbos section in any of these .

You'll see pics of these turbos with FPs "84mm FAP" or flow advancement port covers - comp housings on them .

They still claim 59 pounds a minute air flow but I'd say they fit more easily in the engine bays of Evos Rexs Diamond stars and DSMs .

If it works for them I can't see any reason why it wouldn't on a Nissan RB engine . I can't see why you can't order these turbos with any GT30 turbine housing you like or without if you have your own already .

A .

  On 14/07/2014 at 11:33 PM, Lithium said:

That's a pretty good sign that it works then :) 34GeeTeeTee will spit tacks, those housings make awesome sounds haha

Emailing FP now :whistling:

Haha Jks

well after considering all the options i think i will go with:

HTA 3076 .82 A/R single scroll turbine housing and the '3.25" in 2" out' compressor housing.

Top mount single scroll 6 boost manifold..

Setup should be similar to yours geeteetee so hopefully make 330rwKW on pump

  • Like 2
  On 15/07/2014 at 8:12 AM, BlackBox said:

well after considering all the options i think i will go with:

HTA 3076 .82 A/R single scroll turbine housing and the '3.25" in 2" out' compressor housing.

Top mount single scroll 6 boost manifold..

Setup should be similar to yours geeteetee so hopefully make 330rwKW on pump

Ooh yeah!!! :banana:

  On 15/07/2014 at 8:12 AM, BlackBox said:

well after considering all the options i think i will go with:

HTA 3076 .82 A/R single scroll turbine housing and the '3.25" in 2" out' compressor housing.

Top mount single scroll 6 boost manifold..

Setup should be similar to yours geeteetee so hopefully make 330rwKW on pump

Sounds like quite a potent setup to me- remember 34GeeTeeTee has some good bits on his, not JUST the turbo.... good manifold(s), upgraded cams, good tune probably needed to make sure the full potential is realised. That power isn't messing around on pump gas! It should result in an awesome setup though, regardless of the final figure.

  On 16/07/2014 at 6:01 AM, BlackBox said:

Yep I've got plazmaman too, and 6 boost and tomei type b's on their way.. Was thinking of going to jems for the tune, although haven't fully made up my mind, ..

Adam has done this combo numerous times with positive results ;)

There would be a power difference but I personally wouldn't go smaller than a HTA3582 on an RB30, remembering that the HTAs spool noticeably better than the GT, the difference between a GT3076R and a HTA3582 on a 3 litre should also not be a huge deal

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Good news!!! Changed the O ring today and Iโ€™ve got the โ€œpssshhhhโ€ back when I open the fuel cap ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ™Œ๐Ÿผ๐Ÿ™Œ๐Ÿผ It was 100% the O ring because that bloody thing was inside the fuel tank ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚ Fitting new fuel pump was a pain as always since the DW is a bit longer than stock. But sheโ€™s running!!! โค๏ธ
    • PWM quite literally just chops the ful 12V voltage on and off at whatever duty cycle you're running it at. If you're running it 100%, then it is on full voltage all the time, same as if there was no PWM. If you run it at 50% duty cycle, it is only seeing the full 12V half of the time. This is broadly equivalent to running it at 6V. But the crucial difference is that motors (and a lot of other loads) don't like being powered at low volts. They will either fail to start rotating, or draw a shit ton of current, or other undesirable things. But if you give them the full volt, and then a short period of no volts, and then some more full volts, then the times when they are seeing power they are seeing all the voltage, and they are happy. But you get the performance out of them as if they were only seeing that fraction of the full voltage. It is not really easy to answer your question about what flow you will get out of it at 50% duty cycle. I can tell you that it is not as simple as you think. For a start, that 460 L/h pump is not going to flow 460 when you're on boost. When you're on boost you will be somewhere down the sloping part of that red line. If you have 15 psi of boost, then the pump can only deliver about 95 gal/h, which is <380L/h. So your simple 50% on 460 = 230 wasn't going to work anyway. But also, it won't deliver 50% of 380 either, because when you devolt or PWM trim th epower being fed to the pump, it is not able to deliver flow or pressure in the same way. 50% duty cycle will probably produce <50% of the full voltage flow. The way to find out what duty cycle you need to run it at at low load (ie, at idle) is to idle it and turn the DC down until you start to lose fuel pressure, then turn it back up above that with some extra for safety. And then you do the same thing at full load, in case it doesn't need anywhere near 100% DC. And if you're careful/caution/prudent, you will also do it at a couple of loads in between so you can shape the DC map against load. It might not be linear between the two end points.
    • Man that dinner was such a long time ago....2010! I would only replace the rubber coolant lines with silicone these days; cheap, readily available and will last for ever. You will need new hose clamps though eg https://justjap.com/products/cooling-pro-silicone-engine-heater-hose-set-black-nissan-r32-gtr-rb26dett
    • I wouldn't look too hard at what they did with the R32 GTR in endurance racing in Australia... Lots of things weren't actually available from the factory in the way those cars ran them... Japan also followed what Fred Gibson was doing here with some of there endurance cars in Japan... Australia is also the reason for things like the Brembo brakes, and the change in the gearbox... And quite a few other tricks they used to pull. There's a few other SAU peeps still on these forums that will have heard the stories direct from Alan Heaphy, Fred Gibson, and Jim Richards when we were lucky enough to have a great dinner with them
    • For all the talk of "these parts are junk" I generally recommend OEM because it's really not as bad as claimed. I have never seen or heard of a case like the N63 where the oil returns completely clog with coked oil for example in ~10 years or less. Would it be nice if it were a straighter path? I guess, but most modern cars use a scavenge pump instead of a pure gravity return. Also the factory lines that would be relatively simple to convert to braided are generally speaking hardlines from the factory. I would consider braided line to be a regression, not an improvement. It's also been engineered such that all the hardlines have appropriate strain relief where needed. There's absolutely room for improvement, for example the HKS advantage heritage intake piping shows just how much can be done to make the turbos fight each other less in OEM twin turbo configuration and reduce compressor surge but it's rarely a simple/straightforward process. I recommend looking at what the group A/N1 cars did, generally speaking the changes they made were necessary and proven in endurance racing.
ร—
ร—
  • Create New...