Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm actually in the potential Skyline to Evo camp - but not by choice! I just had my perfect R34 GT-T stolen, and I feel despair at procuring and then modding/touching up another R34... especially as i feel that there are no 'nice' ones currently on the market (NSW/Sydney metro area). I loved having the boost hit hard, and i loved the RWD, which is why I may consider an S15 - but they just feel like a girls car compared to what i was in previously. Considering it's a daily, too, (4 doors, not particularly low suspension) I think a slightly newer Evo around the $20k mark may bring me more joy if I can't find a suitable Skyline (It would have to be perfect and a bargain for me to go interstate/import myself).

The only way to solve the Evo Skyline debacle is to buy one of each and see which one you spend the most time in . My bet is the Skyline will do more miles but you won't want to part with the Evo ...

A .

More maintenance with the EVO you constabtly need to flush out the AYC pump and bleed it to keep it happy.

So you'll tend to drive the EVO less, the Skyline however is like a camel runs on barely anything and keeps on going thus you'll prefer to drive that more and most importantly the Skyline has a larger fuel tank.

One thing I like about the EVO is how small and easy the engine bay is to work on - injectors, turbo, piping all looks easier to do than a large RB25 with its cross-over pipe and general engine layout etc..

But it does look like a pumped-up lancer in n out, its huge wing and nasty engine note screams I'm rice! haha..

You can ditch the AYC for the RS mechanically simpler lighter stronger mechanical LSD . Just keep the pump for the ACD in 7/8/9 . The Americans cry because USDM 8s and 9s only got the non active centre and rear diffs . I think they did get RS model 8s and 9s with mechanical rear LSds , don't know what their GSRs got probably viscous rear .

Funny actually , Mitsy turned the LSD plates around in their RS cars so they basically don't work . If they don't chatter they don't attract complaints in dealerships .

9s got a larger fuel tank and possibly some 8s as well . 4/5/6 were Grp A homologation models and they were trying to keep them light , racers no doubt used a fuel cell anyway .

The 7s just saw a dabble in WRC class but they gave up trying to compete with the kit cars WRC rules allowed . GT4 in a Corolla anyone ?

WRC killed off production based Rally cars just like "Nascar" here killed off production based tarmac racing in Grp A .

A .

  • Like 1

The manufacturers loved it because they never made money out of the special production cars anyway . Not so good for petrol heads .

It allowed the change to Bogun spec-tater racing because beer swilling knuckle abuser isn't interested in the details , it looks like his Falcadore so as long as its wiping its arse over the neighbours heap of shit he can hold his head high above the pie all down his chest .

Tater money is what finances this "motorsport" and without money all motorsport stalls .

A .

  • Like 2

But wouldn't you say it had some reverse effect too. With the global group A racing wouldn't a an enthusiast be more inclined to buy a up-spec model knowing it had the DNA of those on the track? Rather than the V8 supercars and NASCAR where the enthusiast knows has nothing in common with the consumer product? Just thinking out aloud here.

Waiting for someone to say the gtr was banned. ..

As much as I love group A cars....have any of you watched the racing? It was boring as bat shit in the end.

The fia pulled the pin on group A. So we needed a touring car series.....what should they have done instead?

Waiting for someone to say the gtr was banned. ..

As much as I love group A cars....have any of you watched the racing? It was boring as bat shit in the end.

The fia pulled the pin on group A. So we needed a touring car series.....what should they have done instead?

True to a point. The sierras started the downward spiral. However I do have fond memories of the group A. However in saying that it was awesome seeing the volvos, bmw, nissans, jags , holdens and Ford's rubbing shoulders. And the advantages each had on different tracks.. I think with better management it could have worked and thrived. Maybe

One thing I like about the EVO is how small and easy the engine bay is to work on - injectors, turbo, piping all looks easier to do than a large RB25 with its cross-over pipe and general engine layout etc..

Not true.

Having built one from the ground up and changed clutches, timing belts and turbos on a dozen others I can definitely say they are NOT as nice and easy to work on as the old Skyline is. You are in for a world of butt pain if this is a deciding factor in buying the said EVO.

Anyway, your motives are as clear as mud and this thread puts the imagine of a peacock into my mind. A peacock standing on the roof of a skyline showing its EVO colours.. Just do the poor skyline some justice and sell it to someone who will actually drive it. Once you get the EVO you can go as far as removing the wing if it gets in the way of your shopping, etc.

I say this with love <3

  • Like 1

Lancer Evolutions should be called Rice-car Evolution.

Oh so you are back to being Skyline man again? Come out and lets go race our 290kw Nissans! Pick a 3 lane road at least though as mine takes up 2 in the first 3 gears.

I can't wait, it's been 2 years and I am yet to drive it. Hopefully the transfer case lasts the drive home at least. :P

Looks like a weapon! I hate EVO transfer cases with a passion :) Particularly the later ones, the bearings seem to be made of bluetac.

I can't wait, it's been 2 years and I am yet to drive it. Hopefully the transfer case lasts the drive home at least. :P

:O

That thing actually exists.

:P

Bogun racing out here consisted of people who could not believe that the big Aussie Ate Olden or Ford were so out classed by the other brands . Nissan and Ford Sierras were living proof that cars with shitty little ingines and shellas hair dryers were blitzing their big dick extensions . Hence the bull shit bull shit at the mountain back in 92 (beerish for bo gun bo gun) ..

Production based racers are a double edged sword because mainstream models that make manufacturers money are not race like at all . The vast majority don't like cars with race traits because they are not comfortable easy relaxing things to drive . Most tarted up performance cars today are "sporty" rather than sporting - there is a difference and the GTt Evo thing is a good example .

Lets say you get the best standard sport spec Gtt and then grab the equivalent era Evo and go belt them around Mt Panorama . They have on paper the same power (206 Kw) and probably similar weight , Gtt possibly a bit heravier than a 6 GSR . Assuming the same driver and the same conditions I think the 6 would lap faster than the Gtt on the same tyres . I reckon the Gtt would cook up faster than the 6 because of its more modest intercooling and oil cooling . The Gtt would be harder on its tyres and the 6 I reckon would go a lot deeper under brakes because they are larger .

So there you go , one is a tamed down rally basis and the other is a warmed up road car .

More people would prefer the Gtt as a daily road car because that's what it was designed to be . I think more honest track day users would prefer the Evo because that's more towards its intended purpose . I'm sorry if this offends but serious drivers who are focused totally on performance and handling prefer cars like Evos because the comfort compromises are an annoyance to them . They are bent on pure function and a small minority amongst all road users .

The hectic skids and using more than one lane to aim the boat down the river is something else again , Evos aren't as good at that and if its important auto V8 barges probably do it best .

A .

For what you buy an Evo or GTt for they are better value for money than more current exotics . The average person isn't even going to consider the above .

yup, another reason I own a R33 GTS-t with rust and 500000+ kms with a dash that says 143000km LOL

Wonder which dealer hairdressed the car :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...