Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi fellow Stag owners,

Maybe this has been covered, I'm sure it has somewhere, I couldn't find the detailed thread hence posting this one.

Sorry if it's a repeat.

I need to remove the front Axis seats to replace the seat adjusting modules.

How do I remove the plastic trim located on the rear of each seat rail, they sit on the carpet and clip into the rear of the seat rails in a very weird ar$e way that makes them a ball breaker to remove. I can take a chisel and hammer to them but for the original cosmetic I'd like to remove and refit.

They just slide backwards mate. :)

Definitely tried this Scott. The plastic trims that are fixed to the rear of the seat rails don't appear to simply slide off backwards...

Edited by ECR33_RB25DET

Do you have the buttons Pete?

I have a spare seat here. All electrics working.

All good Chris. I have new modules for drivers and passenger seat.

Definitely tried this Scott. The plastic trims that are fixed to the rear of the seat rails don't appear to simply slide off backwards...

Is that your way of saying you would like me to do the job? :P

Pissermoff and put in some Recaros, the stock seats are like a park bench... With a heater.

I would love to pissermoff and put in some R35 GTR seats buts thats a big expense. Yes the stock are not the most comfy but they are leather...

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They need to get a grip. R32 GTRs got as low as AU$8-10K at one point here.
    • You have just offended every teenage boy in America
    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
×
×
  • Create New...