Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Sau.

I am fully aware that different dyno's = different power output, and generally you will not get the same result twice, even on the same dyno and same conditions.

My question is this.

I had my 34R tuned (power FC, front pipe/metal cat/3.5 inch exhaust and boost restrictor removed)

On this dyno, it netted me 263 atw on a 4 wheel dyno

I am now getting Garret - 7 turbos, hks evc 5 and a retune at a different workshop.

They have put the car on the dyno for the "Before tune" run, and this came up with only 213awkw on a 4 wheel dyno.

I was expecting a variance of about 10-15kw give or take, but 50kw seems to be huge.

Reading the RB26 dyno thread, the 263awkw power range for my mods seem to be in line with the average 34R owner.

Is it more likely that the new workshop the car is at is a very low reading dyno?

I guess I'll find out once i get the car back :-)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/
Share on other sites

Thread should get good so I'm in!

The track doesn't lie.

Care to elaborate. Good in what way mate...

As i said in my original post, I am aware of dyno variances, and that dyno operators can change load etc to make a "happy" dyno. That said, as per RB26 dyno thread, with my mods, the majority of GTR owners achieve between 240-260 atw.

For a dyno to throw 213kw is very low.

I guess you're right. Track will separate the men from the boys ey.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343101
Share on other sites

I meant good sarcastically.

Missed the smiley ;)

Remember that it's not just inflated high figures, a low initial run is also beneficial for the shop for impressive printouts.

Of course there could have been a reason for your car putting out lower power. Boost leak etc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343119
Share on other sites

^ dyno wars lol.. that's what he meant

Maybe the previous operator ran it in 4th and maybe this one ran it in 5th (being a R34 GT-R, 5th gear is 1:1 as it's a 6 speed).

Mine didn't change power much between different gears, only the torque went through the roof.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343126
Share on other sites

I concur with the strapping & wheelspin point.

Face it......losses in the drivetrain are not as large as the difference between flywheel power and wheel power would have you believe. If they were, then the oil would boil in gearboxes and diffs in a single dyno pull (just based on the massive number of kW of energy dumped into those oils). Therefore, the power must be going somewhere. And the tyre/roller interface is the single best candidate. Face it - those things are spinning around really fast, so they are well cooled. They definitely have slip at the interface, and we all can see that the harder you strap the car down the more power it makes, so therefore power is definitely being lost in slip.

And that's before you get to the paranoid android stuff involving workshops doing low reading initial runs to make any mods they do look better.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343172
Share on other sites

It's a tad frustrating that there seems to be a culture of automatically assuming that a workshop/dyno/tuner who produces dyno results which read a bit higher than what you are used to the results/tuner are potentially misleading or dishonest and sometimes the info is taken less seriously.

50kw sounds like a LOT to lose, dyno variance or otherwise - you'll certainly be able to tell if the car is as much quicker after the retune as the numbers would indicate.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343179
Share on other sites

I was told my car had 330wkw, it was retuned to 260wkw and feels faster, so explain that one!

I think the first run might have been done in RWD, and the second in AWD, but even so, it seems like a huge difference!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343233
Share on other sites

Power delivery. What you lost in peak power you may have gained everywhere else

So you think he lost 70rwkw and gained what in the midrange? Makes no sense. Yes power delivery and area under the curve are what counts but come on.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343296
Share on other sites

I was told my car had 330wkw, it was retuned to 260wkw and feels faster, so explain that one!

I think the first run might have been done in RWD, and the second in AWD, but even so, it seems like a huge difference!

Feels faster or is faster?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343314
Share on other sites

The term of 1HP, is defined by people and more specifically to the people whom builds dyno meters.

There are no obvious concepts proves one's terminology is at mistake, so there will not be an matching dyno reading between two branded dyno meters.

On top of it, there are configurations determined by operator that could alter an precise output, as well as the extend of vehicle setup on particular dyno meters.

Seeking psychological balance as well as for the sake of promoting successful businesses. Owners whom bought a lower reading dyno will likely to argue that their reading stand for the absolute accuracy while others are inflated, While operator with an higher reading dyno might argue the lower reading dynos are poorly calibrated, On the end every one is there to defend for their own investment, While the true focus of a car can only produce so much "HP" with given fuel and given supporting mods at optimum calibration is lost.

Dyno is just a tool. so the quotation of what a specific setup is capable of doing is more accurately served based on past experiences of an likely setup. As I quote the capacity of my turbochargers to relatively common turbochargers which past collection of data is plentiful. Alternatively quote based on a percentage gain based on factory output. That way it is more meaningful then just a number.

Besides, for people whom value the safety of their own and others on road, the maximum potential of a engine is rarely used. It might be worth while for some tuners advertising drive ability and fuel consumption rather then just peek power. Which I prefer if tuners might be able to put some explanations into their work and spend some time educate people how a car should be tuned based on Torque, AFR, Timing, and Fuel maps. That way not only ensures the vehicle is tuned to their maximum potential, and most importantly let customers understand what their maximum potential is, in reference to supporting mods installed.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343349
Share on other sites

long story short, dyno a tuning tool to safely determine max torque and load up the motor without snapping out sideways and getting pulled over by cops.

Want to test power? go do a quarter mile.. that never lies (technical constraints apply, such as: tyres, weather, surface temperature, driver ability, not getting kicked off the track because you ran a 10, etc.)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343384
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...