Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

SO I have a platinum pro and are looking at going flex and stumbled across some American forums that had you can use the GM sensor, you just need to change the plug:

Use a GM flex sensor

Part # 13577394 (long tube) $66 or

Part# 13577379 (short tube)

Either buy the GM Harness and rewire Part # 13352241

or buy the plug and pins yourself

Now they look exactly the same and works out to be a lot cheaper, apparently both are 50-150hz.

Pic below.

Can anyone confirm this

HT011000

F60482058

The other side is that a guy in the states is running this sensor and instead of using a IO expander, he is using a zeitronix ethathnol gauge to convert the signal to a linear 5v signal.

He then inputs that signal into the spare AVI.

The sensor also reads fuel temp, so you use the other AVI to read the fuel temp......

I wouldn't be surprised if they are rebranded GM sensors - Their external MAP sensors (4-5 bar) which I have are "GM" ones or "Haltech" ones depending on who you ask.

I have the haltech one, and happily paid the extra to make sure it worked.

I wanted to peel the sticker off to look more 'factory' but never did it. Maybe I'll do it and see if the PN under the sticker is there/the same.

So basically this is very doable.

Zeitronix gauge is $200

GM Ethanol sesnsor and wiris $80

This issue I have run into, is that my dual widebands occupy my AVI inputs into my haltech. So looks like I will have to get the exander box regardless.

If I had the newer CAN widebands.... good to go on the flex set up I have described, as the newer dual bands use the CAN input and not the AVI slots.

You have a couple of options.. Go the Zeitronix unit and use 2xAVI's on the Haltech, but by this stage you have spent $500 and have used up 2 valuable inputs (if you have them spare - if not Haltech can mod the AVIP inputs to act as regular AVI's if you have those spare)

Haltech sells a CAN IO Expander Bundle with Flex sensor for RRP$599 (haltech part HT-059906), slightly more expensive but the IO box gives you plenty of extra IO should you need it down the track (fuel/oil/coolant pressure sensors, extra temp sensors etc). You also only use a single digital input on the Haltech to get both Ethanol Content and Fuel Temperature. :cheers:

Most ecu's can get away with using one input, ditching the fuel temp input. It would be nice to have, but surely you have one spare 0-5v input... It depends how you want the tune done, and how hard you plan to push it I guess

Personally I would just run dual maps as there is less chance of a failure. It's not like you will ever run petrol again once you convert. :P

  • 2 years later...
I have been told that gm is the only manufacturer of fuel flex sensor and any others are just rebranded gm products. 


That would be correct, but I believe continental is the manufacturer. Siemens also makes flex sensors of a different type. At the end of the day make sure you buy one from a reputable source, i bought one off ebay that was meant to be of good quality but was no good. I then got one through nistune.
  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...