Jump to content
SAU Community

Power Loss On Downshifts, Bouncing Idle And Slight Hesitation At Specific Rev Point -R34Gtt


Recommended Posts

I have the same symptoms in my R32.

Would drive normally like 90% of the time, then occastionally would lose all power at 3000+rpm. Off and on, i would get power 1 second, lose all the next. Sometimes on and off repeat. Then I would sit in lower rpms for a bit and it would drive fine.

Now it is far worse. Diring a drive around town it will cut all power above 3000 and not let me rev above it, then it would allow me again only to cut all power again as if i completely let off the throttle and then it would stall out going 40mph losing all power steering and power brakes with it which led to a serious oh shit! moment.

I'm fairly certain it's the AFM. I accidently drove the car around with it unplugged once and it drove exactly the same way. Wouldn't rev above 3000 rpm etc. When the car would work it was working fine, I did 4 laps on a track with it when it was a minor issue without it happening once so i'm fairly certain it's not fuel pump, coils, or anything of that nature.

Edited by Kanaric

Condition of plugs from cyl 1,2 & 5, also see the top of cylinders where they sit. Doesnt seem to be running too rich (black) or too lean (white) ie the plugs, but maybe a bit on the rich side?

post-49401-14076531188574_thumb.jpgpost-49401-14076531362503_thumb.jpgpost-49401-14076531635675_thumb.jpgpost-49401-14076531836719_thumb.jpgpost-49401-1407653198521_thumb.jpg

More bov entry angle/intake pipe pics for you fellas, dont look too bad hey..

Scotty, GTSBoy, Johhny..will be changed nws, but last thing after all else

post-49401-14076534786091_thumb.jpgpost-49401-14076534985257_thumb.jpg

Edited by rondofj

That angle is pretty much the same as the stock angle (seeing as the steel return pipe and rubber is the stock one, you'd expect so), but I think that doesn't work too well when you get rid of the convoluted inlet elbow. Smooth inlet pipe seems to demand a steeper return angle, more towards the compressor. As most advice on here has already said.

So my 1 channel monitor (ign timing) shows that normal 40-60,80km/h street driving under 3k rpms sees the timing move in the region 20-40 ish, depending on revs/load; high boost/high rpm n crazy speeds sees very low timing going down to 10ish, definitely 10s. Shifting UP the timing will drop to 10,15 etc for a second when shifting/releasing throttle. Shifting DOWN sees the timing go UP to high 40s, (highest 48) for a second before normalising in the 20-30 band. Is this why I feel the laaaaag/power loss, do other areas of timing sound right??

This may be a stupid question but did all these issues exist when you took it off your tuner?

Are you running the same boost level that it has been tuned for?. Did your tuner know of the knocking problem? What you are describing does not make sense at all.

When I took it to tuner it had Nistune so no bogging down under downshifts/load, no bouncing idle, no stickiness' at 1500-2000, but yes all other probs- it was very thirsty and intermittent ly running rough/crap now n then long before that. Same boost. And yes absolutely NO knocking over 20-30 with O2 sensor plugged in and feedback enabled. Yesterday the intake was really really hot with O2 unplugged thats why it knocked I think. Possibly running too lean

Only recommendation I have is if you want to manage it yourself is buy a afr kit for $200 that way you know exactly what your mixtures are, and also log a real-time graph on your ignition to see if there is variance when it is on boost. Knock sensors are good but not perfect and if you have a noisy gates belt or cam/bearing type noise it could be triggering knock or you could be detonating and not hearing it. Your tune maybe out because you had it tuned with boost leaks and now it is running lean at wot but dumps fuel when off throttle because of the reverberation problem. Or the gates belt is causing variance in timing, might have to do the aem mod to the cas to stabilise timing. So many things it could be. Maybe get an afr kit and see how it reads.

Or maybe bring it back to your tuner.

Edited by XGTRX

One thing is if you downshift and dont suddenly give it load, ie doubleshift/doubleclutch or wait a second or two before engaging the clutch the car wont bog down and lose power like it normally does., it will hook up well n go.

so you have a dodgy AFM by looks of it, your OEM coils were cheap, your BOV returns on the wrong angle, you have leaks and using a gates timing belt.

Its no surprise that it doesn't run perfect, best just to buy the stuff quality and new to avoid all this stuff around with it,

Edited by AngryRB
  • Like 1

One thing is if you downshift and dont suddenly give it load, ie doubleshift/doubleclutch or wait a second or two before engaging the clutch the car wont bog down and lose power like it normally does., it will hook up well n go.

Reverberation issue, that's why I assume.

Double clutching a syncro box is something they do in movies, do it in real life and you will destroy your syncros, double clutching is for dog boxes only and also the slowest way of shifting

so you have a dodgy AFM by looks of it, your OEM coils were cheap, your BOV returns on the wrong angle, you have leaks and using a gates timing belt.

Its no surprise that it doesn't run perfect, best just to buy the stuff quality and new to avoid all this stuff around with it,

That comments half retarded and maybe sarcastic. What is dodgy about my afm, its not a fake z32, my coils being cheap dont mean its not legit, although thats possible (car dont have symptoms of bad coils does it?!). It was n still is advertised as genuine nissan OEM items. As for leaks, everyones got some and mines largely sorted. And I dont have issues with my Gates belt, most people run one dont they, and I would use one again! So that just leaves the bov entry...

Double clutching a syncro box is something they do in movies, do it in real life and you will destroy your syncros, double clutching is for dog boxes only and also the slowest way of shifting

So you mean granny shifting, not double clutching like you should, isn't real?

Dang.

But on topic, I'd change the return point for the bov. Im actually in the process of putting a stock bov on my cefiro, and Mark (unigroup) said to be carefull how I plumb it in, and pretty much said point it directly at the turbo.

Broken record I know, but its worth a shot yes?

As for you fuel economy, are you thrashing it everywhere? cause 250km to a tank is shocking.

I've got the 02 turned off, doesnt affect the on boost performance and I easliy get 400 -450km to a tank

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...