Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Currently my setup is as follows:

RB26 - standard bottom end

Tomei type b cams

3inch exhaust

GT3582R 19psi

and all the other bits and pieces to go with it

Now i made 510rwhp, my tuner took the torque figure because he sais it was pretty useless.

From others graphs Ive seen with the same turbo the torque has been around the 500 mark.

My question is, if i change back to say -5's and put my car on e85 will i make the same power but heaps more torque?

Most -5 setups Ive been seeing are all 700+ with some making just over 1000 with around the same 500hp figure

And then have the other obvious advantages like legality.

The car is a street car but I would like to get into a track day here and there and would really just like to get the most out of it.

No point having the high mount single when i could have better results with the twins and still look legal under the bonnet.

Am i on the right track?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/446203-thinking-of-going-back-to-twins/
Share on other sites

Go do a few track days without changing anything.

The car will have far more speed than you can extract out of yourself.

+1.

I never realised how much my car outperformed my driving skills on a track until I actually got out and started doing laps. No point making upgrades if you are the weakest link.

As for going back to twins, I would keep the GT35R you have on there now unless you're seriously concerned about copping a defect. The difference between -5s and a GT35R would be very minimal.

+1.

I never realised how much my car outperformed my driving skills on a track until I actually got out and started doing laps. No point making upgrades if you are the weakest link.

As for going back to twins, I would keep the GT35R you have on there now unless you're seriously concerned about copping a defect. The difference between -5s and a GT35R would be very minimal.

Or if you are concerned about your result swap it out for a HTA3582 or GTX3582 and lean on it and you will make more than you could ever need...

But as the other guys said, its just a number... The car by rights should be bloody quick as it is so there is no point spending all that time and money going back to low mounts.

i just want to mention that reading torque from a dyno graph is absolutely useless unless it's an engine dyno.

don't compare your torque figures to other peoples, it doesn't make sense to do so.

torque changes with leverage so using a different gear or even different size wheels will yield a different result. It is also possible to get much more torque at the wheels than at the engine (unlike power). so forget about it!

if you really want to upgrade your turbo look at what Matt said. My choice would be the HTA3582. It will be more responsive and have more top end than your current turbo

Why is it running "only" 19psi? The torque figure is largely going to be from the engine VE and boost level, all other things being equal. If you have a good exhaust manifold and tune then psi for psi the GT35R should be more or less capable of matching or bettering your typical -5 setup - at least until you start maxing it out (-5s probably have a slight peak flow potential).

Sorting out the tune and raising the boost should see more to be had, any lack of torque isn't indicative of that turbo's potential - especially at that boost level.

i just want to mention that reading torque from a dyno graph is absolutely useless unless it's an engine dyno.

don't compare your torque figures to other peoples, it doesn't make sense to do so.

torque changes with leverage so using a different gear or even different size wheels will yield a different result. It is also possible to get much more torque at the wheels than at the engine (unlike power). so forget about it!

if you really want to upgrade your turbo look at what Matt said. My choice would be the HTA3582. It will be more responsive and have more top end than your current turbo

+1

Torque figures on a standard dyno is meaningless

They have plenty of meaning, that is how they tune for maximum best torque. As long as no variables are changed then torque output is a critical component of seeing the performance gains of mods.

Of course comparing torque figures between dyno's is gayer than comparing dicks.

  • Like 1

They have plenty of meaning, that is how they tune for maximum best torque. As long as no variables are changed then torque output is a critical component of seeing the performance gains of mods.

Of course comparing torque figures between dyno's is gayer than comparing dicks.

yes of course but the numbers are arbitrary

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is the territory of the "Stage 1/2/3 Golf GTI/R" or otherwise off the shelf tune with (relative to before) minor mods. It's easier now. Downpipe and Tune and boom, big increases. Stage 1 OEM+ is where it's at. This is where the niche evolved into and it's really easy to see why. It's rare to even NEED to consider changing turbos or going to aftermarket ECU's or building bottom ends for more power. Stage 1-2-3 will get you a LONG WAY. Civic Type R turbo GR Yaris/Corolla Anything with B58 (MKV Supra/x40i) Anything BMW in General Anything Audi in General Any turbo AMG RenaultSport Turbo offerings Korean Elantra N/I30N Ecoboost Mustangs Focus RS? List goes on. I would argue in the future it won't even need to go on... M3P is pretty rapid out of the box...
    • There is a way, but it's not with the same cars. You need to find the same vintage of car, that we had. Realistically, that was an affordable car with aftermarket parts around. So what people need to find is a car that had a decent base in its day, and can be modified. They're looking for a car year make of 2010 to 2015 really... Aus could have done it if Holden didn't fold as V8 commodores were cheap, and if Ford didn't get expensive thanks to COVID, then you could cheaply play with FG Barras. Realistically, those are just a bit heavier, four door skylines. I'm sure the US and UK have similar cars they could find.
    • Haha I do that.. thats when it chirps..The bit point for me is almost non-existent. Otherwise I stall it. But yes, in terms of performance, the clutch is solid af.
    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
×
×
  • Create New...