Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

sup eeeeeeeevvvvvvveryy body
im a little bored and im after a little more response ! im currently running a gt3037s .84 rear housing and external gate on a stock r34 manifold. its making a tad over 300kw on e85.
i was thinking of changing the rear housing to a twin scroll housing ? don't know if its worth changing it to a .84 or a 1.06 twin scroll housing ?
or should i just buy another turbo :/

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/446334-3037-with-twin-scroll-housing/
Share on other sites

If you changed to twin scroll it would do these 3 things:

- Make boost a little earlier

- Not push you as hard in the seat when it does

- Cost a lot of money to do

My recommendation:

Replace the 3037 cartridge kit with a GTX3071 and keep your .84 EWG setup. Known winning formula.

Case closed!

  • Like 1

Leave it well enough alone the GTX3071 is not an upgrade IMO.

The cost of changing to TS is just not worth the effort.

Agreed, to do TS properly costs way too much.

This is pretty much what I did, changing the GTX3076 for the GTX3071, it was night and day for response, with very little loss in my case. If you can get a good price for the 3037 I would say go for it.

Do you want more power? Otherwise drop a GTX28 on there and run ethanol. Response and power. ;)

  • Like 1

Leave it well enough alone the GTX3071 is not an upgrade IMO.

The cost of changing to TS is just not worth the effort.

I've only been in 2 GTX3071 powered cars, though have experienced a myriad of GT3076 and can say the GTXs definitely have the upper hand.

To the point, OP is asking about doing a twin scroll upgrade to get a little more response. Dollar for dollar I am more than confident that the swap to the GTX will get him the little extra zing he's after without the flatter feel.

Whether or not it is really a worthwhile change is as subjective and dependent on personal preference as can be, but I think the comment serves to answer the question.

GTX3071 is more of a sideways step IMO.

Slot a Forced Performance FP3076 into your existing exhaust housing....GeeTeeTee has proven back to back better response and power over his GT3076. Might be what you are looking for minimal changes and for minimal cost.

Link:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/426059-forced-performance-hta-turbos/

If you have your heart set on a twin-scroll setup (and prepared to spend the dollars) then I'd be looking to the Borg Warner EFR series of turbo's as these can be had in external or internal gate twin scroll form. Internal gate would save a lot of fabrication work.

FWIW here's an early graph of my 3071 TS .78 (s15) during tuning overlayed onto a tradition single scroll 3071 setup (on a different s15) which shows the more linear nature of a twin scroll setup which may go to some way as to why some may say they don't hit as hard compared to a single scroll setup.

Dyno2.jpg

Edited by juggernaut1

sup eeeeeeeevvvvvvveryy body

im a little bored and im after a little more response ! im currently running a gt3037s .84 rear housing and external gate on a stock r34 manifold. its making a tad over 300kw on e85.

i was thinking of changing the rear housing to a twin scroll housing ? don't know if its worth changing it to a .84 or a 1.06 twin scroll housing ?

or should i just buy another turbo :/

cheers

a tad over 300kw on E85? you must be running about 14psi or the tune needs more timing put in, that shouldn't be too boring at all, maybe it just needs another tune with more boost and

using a EBC to awaken the turbo more.

maybe it just needs another tune with more boost and

using a EBC to awaken the turbo more.

+1

A good EBC makes a world of difference. Going from gate pressure to now running an EBoost Street40 has made a remarkable difference to my car.

Refer post 140 showing a GT3076 with twin scroll .82 ex hsg on an RB....once again note the linear nature of the curve.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/269782-twin-scroll-vs-single/page-7

Edited by juggernaut1

so what i gather is
its a waste of money going a twin scroll housing with a gt3037 on a standard manifold.
ill see more benefits if i go : FP3076
GTX3071
hypergear
do i sell my rear housing or do all above turbo cartridges suit ?
any other opinions oradvice ?

What you actually want is not clear other than "a little more response".

Bigger hp number? Stick more boost into it and tune.

Different torque delivery on boost, or spool characteristics? The FP turbo appears to be a good thing, retaining existing manifold/gate/piping. Split pulse might have the upper hand in lower/middle range rpm but you're into new manifolding, gate(s) and piping. Cost consideration.

More off boost torque and earlier transition into boost? There's no substitute for cubic inches.

so what i gather is

its a waste of money going a twin scroll housing with a gt3037 on a standard manifold.

ill see more benefits if i go : FP3076

GTX3071

hypergear

do i sell my rear housing or do all above turbo cartridges suit ?

any other opinions oradvice ?

If it were me, id take the turbo off and send it to Forced Performance for a 73mm comp wheel modification, cheaper and more effective result than Twin scroll and less work too.

Then you can join the HTA thread and brag about how good it is lol...

http://store.forcedperformance.net/merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Store_Code=FP&Category_Code=Turbo-Upgrade

Edited by AngryRB
  • Like 1

A few observations;

You want to retain standard manifold, have more response and hit 350kw. Cannot be done. Pick 2 of the 3 only.

Just to reaffirm my position.. Going to the twin scroll will make it the opposite of the 'more aggressive' that you are asking for.

Here are your two options based on the requests you are currently making:

1. Run E85 and max out the 3037 as is to get as close to 350kw as possible.

2. Swap to a GTX3071 core and run E85 to get probably 20kw less than the 3037 but a reasonable amount more response and possibly a little more punch.

  • Like 1

Subjective is it with any GT30 based turbo on a std manifold RB25 . Not quite sure what a 0.84 turbine housing is , typo 0.82 ?

My experience with the 52T version is that drive round power is very adequate but tuning even on E85 is critical in the rev/load ranges used every day . If the fueling timing spark is a bit how ya goin then it will feel lazy and it isn't necessarily the turbo causing it .

My take with the 0.82 GT30 hot side is that you can tune it to run better than with std or GT28 based turbos because the engine breathes out better and you can take advantage of that if you or your tuner tries . And this is with little or no boost .

I think it's a fact of life that you aren't going to get 10 pounds of boost at 2000 revs with one of these (first three gears anyway real world) and you wouldn't like it if could . But if you have an RB25 in good condition even a mechanically standard one it can be more than adequate on the street . The more I think about it many of their physical characteristics are the reason why they don't pull like a Patrol at 2000 revs and if you want all that's available small turbos aren't the way to go about it . The issue is can you make enough part throttle torque for your liking and can you accept that it won't pull like a locomotive till somewhere in the mid 3000s . If you want it all you have to have good tuning and absolutely the most accurate fueling injector wise you can get because I think it does affect the part throttle lowish torque .

I wouldn't have a 34 Neo Turbo without EV14s unless it was stock as a rock . To run E85 to 300 you obviously have different injectors and pump and they won't be small . Big injectors often struggle to spray well at low pulse widths and if yours is a dribbling mess like mine possibly is then the basic engine won't give its best at light loads and the pre spool area . Basically to me its how well you can get your engine to run up to the point where the turbo boosts and FI takes off .

A .

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...