Jump to content
SAU Community

Tyre Crack/cuts On Inner Sidewall - What Could Be The Cause?


Recommended Posts

Well if there's enough tread left for another 15,000 kms but sidewalls start cracking, are they fit for purpose? Should tyres last for more than 18 months in normal use? I guess we'll never find out.

These Goodyears are fairly hard compound and people normally get a lot of km's out of a set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't get past the "only 15,000km on them" - I have chewed out tyres in 15,000km. I think you would be hard put to say they were not fit for purpose having done 15,000km.

Wear on the tread is fine, cracks/tears in the sidewall are a different thing entirely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't buy those tyres lol. Plenty of other tyres on the market.

32 psi won't do that damage so that's a load of shit. if you had 10psi then yeah it's plausible then.

I had a flat (twice) on one tyre, drove around for a few (10) km, pumped them up, kept driving. Bigger sidewall than yours but no damage, they were cheap Nankangs as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it was 25psi or under, yes under inflated but 32psi is BS. I would go to the manufacture and provide a copy of the invoice.

For example if you were using them on the track, and wanted 38 psi hot temps, you would be starting at around 32 psi cold depending on track, track temps, speed/driving style.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For my daily I always check the depth of tread on the outside of the tyre compared to middle, then adjust the pressure until the wear is even, and then every 6 months rotate the fronts to the rears. If the middle has less tread depth than the outside, the tyre is over inflated. If the outside has less, the tyre is under inflated. If one edge is wearing down more than the other edge then you have an alignment/ camber issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 psi is for driving around town soaking up bumps :P. Pump that shit up to 38-40 psi.

I used to run 36 all round, dropped to 33 in the front, couldn't stand the noise from cracks in the roads on the direzza Z1's. I must be getting old...

Edited by sucram
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Interesting. So my warranty claim was denied due to the 'low pressure' and 'non-standard camber', I wonder if I could refer this issue to anybody else? Manufacturer? I obviously don't have the damaged tyres anymore so it's getting a bit complicated..

Sorry for locating this thread belatedly.

When I had 2 cracked 3 yr old Nankangs on a Prelude some years ago, I rang around to find out what company was the Aussie distributor of Nankangs. So Blaire Tyres kept one offending tyre and placed a submission on my behalf. Within a week Nankang replaced the whole set despite 40% wear on the existing ones.

A Goodyear distributor with clout could have been your best friend, and lots of goodwill could be had. The distributor would have lost nothing except a bit of time. That's all!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry for locating this thread belatedly.

When I had 2 cracked 3 yr old Nankangs on a Prelude some years ago, I rang around to find out what company was the Aussie distributor of Nankangs. So Blaire Tyres kept one offending tyre and placed a submission on my behalf. Within a week Nankang replaced the whole set despite 40% wear on the existing ones.

A Goodyear distributor with clout could have been your best friend, and lots of goodwill could be had. The distributor would have lost nothing except a bit of time. That's all!

Thanks heaps Terry. I haven't been able to get distributor's details from the vendor but perhaps I could try Goodyear directly. Might give them a call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Thread revival – I was just under the car then and I think I can see a couple of cracks appearing again on the inner sidewall of the front left tyre. WTH?!

They are small and only visible in the bottom part where the tyre is bulging under the weight of the car. However if the previous set is anything to go by, there will be more cracks soon :(

These tyres have been religiously run at 38 PSI for about 15 months and just 12,000 kms, and rotated a couple of times. Not daily driven and only occasional spirited driving. They are 3213 manufacture and made in Germany.

I don't get it. Could it be something mechanical after all?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...then again, I was doing some more research and found all these:

Each has photos of various Goodyear F1's cracked in a very similar fashion to mine. I just can't believe I would have two faulty sets in a row.

Design flaw? Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The consumer law is strong - push hard and use it. Expect to be bullshitted and pushed back against. Get all your monies back. Boycott Goodyear when buying tyres. Get on with your life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Quick update on this, I just received a set of replacement tyres (Kumho KU36's) from the retailer and the second set of Goodyears is being returned to them for inspection.

Just in case anyone lands here googling for Goodyear F1 Asymmetric 2 inner sidewall cracking, here's the notes that sent back to the retailer:

Here's some quick notes on the Goodyear F1 Asymmetric 2's I ran for when you discuss this with your distributor:

  • First set was mounted in Jan 2013 and removed in Aug 2014. These were on the car for 15,000 kms, run at 32psi. At this point they had developed cracks on 3-4 of the tyres on the inner sidewall.
  • Second set (3213 manufacture) was mounted in Aug 2014 and removed in March 2016. These were on the car for 14,800 kms, run precisely at 38psi as per your recommendation. I found several cracks on one of the tyres back in December 2015, again on the inner sidewall.
  • The car has always had a solid alignment settings and there wasn't excessive camber wear on either set. Also both sets of tyres had recent manufacture dates so that shouldn't be the issue.
My best guess is that it's a manufacturing flaw e.g. faulty compound that results in inner sidewall failure under certain circumstances. As mentioned before, there are photos of various Goodyear F1's cracked in a very similar fashion to mine on several forums:

I never got any refund for the first set and had to fight real hard for the second one despite the identical symptoms ... I can assure you that I won't be buying Goodyears again anytime soon.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
×
×
  • Create New...