Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

street car & very little track time?

Go Bilstein shocks & some decent springs.

All up will cost you the same price as a set of BC coilovers and will be light years ahead in terms of comfort/handling

Demontweaks have them pretty good, like $750 shipped then buy some local springs done.

Nope, not a fan boy. I just know what a good damper feels like - also a damper that has heaps of settings already shows that it's not good. Dampers should damper a large range of frequencies not just a small range. It's like comparing a good 2 way speaker to some fully sick 4 way speaker. What sounds better?

If you look at Bilstein PSS9, Cusco Zero 2R, Ohlins they all don't have 30+ points of adjustment.

I'm waiting on MCA to bring to market R33 coilovers kits and I'm moving to them.

And to your point don't slam your car.

  • Like 1

Nope, not a fan boy. I just know what a good damper feels like - also a damper that has heaps of settings already shows that it's not good. Dampers should damper a large range of frequencies not just a small range. It's like comparing a good 2 way speaker to some fully sick 4 way speaker. What sounds better?

If you look at Bilstein PSS9, Cusco Zero 2R, Ohlins they all don't have 30+ points of adjustment.

I'm waiting on MCA to bring to market R33 coilovers kits and I'm moving to them.

And to your point don't slam your car.

I think i saw GKTECH were going to do an entry level range with MCA stuff?

If you look at Bilstein PSS9, Cusco Zero 2R, Ohlins they all don't have 30+ points of adjustment.

Actually, the Ohlins I have here do. You understand they are just a grub screw underneath the cap, and the clicks are caused by notches with a ball and spring inside the cap. The amount of clicks has absolutely nothing to do with the range of dampening or the quality. If you think it does, you are just plain wrong. Keep spreading the 'Bilstein' fanboi rubbish Johnny. :P

Dampening needs to be matched to spring rate. If you just buy Bilstein's and whack any cheapskate (King) spring on there, you will never have the correct dampening. (unless SK sends the springs and adjusts the valving to suit) At least with coilovers you get some adjustment, that way they can be set close enough if you are competent to do that. If not you could just pay someone to corner weight them and set the dampening in the ballpark.

My point is, for the price the BC's are a very capable unit. They will never compete with competition coilovers with rebound adjustment and gold plated valving, but they are very well suited to a road car, if you select the correct (softer) spring rates. Mine are still going strong 5+ years on, and considering they cost less than replacement stock shocks alone, they are a no brainer.

  • 2 months later...

Thought it would be useful to follow up, most people leave once they're happy with the answers, but if anyone else ever looks, here's the verdict

I ended up going with BC coilovers, and had them set for 6/4. On the GTT, they are of course forked at the back.

We ended up going for legal minimum height for victoria for a bit of balance. I'm happy with the result as if it was any lower i'd have to get bigger wheels and roll the arches because it would look terrible. Also, vics has a lot of crap roads. Last thing I want is a pothole to take off the front bumper.

The end result was spot on what everybody has been saying - I'd say I feel about a 25% improvement in handling. It's heavier, Sturdier, & more "confident" when cornering. Just point the wheel and it sticks. The limiting factor at this point is my back tyres, but thats the endless struggle anyway.

6/4 Seems to be pretty much perfect for balance. No - speedbumps are not fun, but theyre not horrible either. I wouldn't be going over them at more than 30 km/s or with anybody that has a spinal injury :P

Aside from that, vast improvement, & quick & easy to get put in. 450 bucks & half a day at the shop.

Thank you for all the input.

Alex

Good to hear you're happy with the setup.

Just a note on the Bilstein Fanboi thing. In my 20 years involvement in club rallying, Bilsteins have been the go-to brand for people building custom suspensions for gravel rally cars. This was when we had to design and build our own coilovers, years before the market was flooded with aftermarket coilovers from a dozen different companies.

Bilstein have been making the shock hardware for these applications for a very long time, and have always offered to valve the product to suit your application. Even today, I see their gear under a lot of rally cars, and it's a great budget alternative to the remote canister mega $$ kits available today. One of their strengths is that they are rebuildable (I know a few rally guys who rebuild their own, for little more than a few $$ per unit)

Maybe I am a bit of a Fanboi, but you can't argue their quality. I know there is potentially better gear out there, but believe me, there is a hell of a lot worse too.

  • Like 1

Nope, not a fan boy. I just know what a good damper feels like - also a damper that has heaps of settings already shows that it's not good. Dampers should damper a large range of frequencies not just a small range. It's like comparing a good 2 way speaker to some fully sick 4 way speaker. What sounds better?

If you look at Bilstein PSS9, Cusco Zero 2R, Ohlins they all don't have 30+ points of adjustment.

I'm waiting on MCA to bring to market R33 coilovers kits and I'm moving to them.

And to your point don't slam your car.

The PSS9 has a flawed adjuster and has been replaced by the B16 PSS10. The B14 PSS is likely a better option than the PSS9 as the savings allow for linear springs and camber tops.

Are you bilstein fanboys using B6 bilstein shocks? I ask because bilstein and some local suppliers have said I should not use the B6 shock with any lowering spring and recommend the B8 shock when lowering. Thoughts?

The B8 is of the same design as the B6 although with a shorter stroke to suit lowering springs.

Good to hear you're happy with the setup.

Just a note on the Bilstein Fanboi thing. In my 20 years involvement in club rallying, Bilsteins have been the go-to brand for people building custom suspensions for gravel rally cars. This was when we had to design and build our own coilovers, years before the market was flooded with aftermarket coilovers from a dozen different companies.

Bilstein have been making the shock hardware for these applications for a very long time, and have always offered to valve the product to suit your application. Even today, I see their gear under a lot of rally cars, and it's a great budget alternative to the remote canister mega $$ kits available today. One of their strengths is that they are rebuildable (I know a few rally guys who rebuild their own, for little more than a few $$ per unit)

Maybe I am a bit of a Fanboi, but you can't argue their quality. I know there is potentially better gear out there, but believe me, there is a hell of a lot worse too.

Agreed, that's exactly why I run them. I've owned Koni, Kings, Tokico etc, and am on my third car with Bilsteins. Reliability and consistency being the key reasons. I know I can drive a couple of hundred kms on gravel roads per month and still have a functional shock. If they die, I can drive 8minutes down the road to Brett O'Brien of shock works and get them rebuilt to whatever rates we see fit, knowing components are likely on hand at the distributor who is another 20 minutes away. It's often not that simple with the cheapo BC/Tein stuff.

I have 8/6 BC br series in my 34 GTT which is also my daily driver. Have slightly stretched tyres and it sits just above the tyre. Its not that bumpy at all. Hell i drove it to qld and back last year for the modball rally and even the mrs didn't complain lol.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As I said, there's trade offs to jamming EVERYTHING in. Timing, resources etc, being the huge ones. Calling out the factory ECU has nothing to do with it, as it doesn't do any form of fancy boost control. It's all open loop boost control. You mention the Haltech Nexus, that's effectively two separate devices jammed into one box. What you quote about it, is proof for that. So now you've lost flexibility as a product too...   A product designed to do one thing really well, will always beat other products doing multiple things. Also, I wouldn't knock COTS stuff, you'd be surprised how many things are using it, that you're probably totally in love with As for the SpaceX comment that we're working directly with them, it's about the type of stuff we're doing. We're doing design work, and breaking world firsts. If you can't understand that I have real world hands on experience, including in very modern tech, and actually understand this stuff, then to avoid useless debates where you just won't accept fact and experience, from here on, it seems you'd be be happy I (and possibly anyone with knowledge really) not reply to your questions, or input, no matter how much help you could be given to help you, or let you learn. It seems you're happy reading your data sheets, factory service manuals, and only want people to reinforce your thoughts and points of view. 
    • I don't really understand because clearly it's possible. The factory ECU is running on like a 4 MHz 16-bit processor. Modern GDI ECUs have like 200 MHz superscalar cores with floating point units too. The Haltech Nexus has two 240 MHz CPU cores. The Elite 2500 is a single 80 MHz core. Surely 20x the compute means adding some PID boost control logic isn't that complicated. I'm not saying clock speed is everything, but the requirements to add boost control to a port injection 6 cylinder ECU are really not that difficult. More I/O, more interrupt handlers, more working memory, etc isn't that crazy to figure out. SpaceX if anything shows just how far you can get arguably doing things the "wrong" way, ie x86 COTS running C++ on Linux. That is about as far away from the "correct" architecture as it gets for a real time system, but it works anyways. 
    • Holy hell! That is absolutely stunning! Great work!!!
    • It does when you start adding everything else in. But it's not just compute. It's the logic. Getting your timing right (I'm not meaning ignition timing for the engine). Making sure of your memory mappings, seeing your interrupts. Microcontroller devices only have so much capacity. For the most part, you want all those timers and interrupts in use on your engine control, which means you're left with less than ideal methods for timing and management of other control functions.   Let's put it this way, my job is all about building custom hardware, that goes into cars, and integrates with them. We're also waiting on a media confirmation from SpaceX too fora world first we've just completed with them in NZ too. It's not just the little toys I play with. But you know, you can think and believe what you want.
    • I don't think it's a good buy, the trend looks bad     lol.
×
×
  • Create New...