Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i am sure you ladies will be interested

i get discounts at otomoto and they are having a intro special for a few months through me

rb26 inlet v cam setup

tried and tested in japan

supplied by otomoto

currently undergoing testing in australia

intro pricing fro group buy $3000

post-219-0-17389500-1410844149_thumb.jpg

it runs using rb25 neo used parts which you can find second hand or buy new for 800

post-219-0-16672500-1410844161_thumb.jpg

its a simple system and i have asked if they can produce the same thing for the exhuast cam in the future

stolen from outomoto facebook page

Otomoto is happy to announce the release of a new variable cam timing kit for RB26 heads. The kit was developed in Japan and uses some Nissan RB25DET Neo parts and other original parts to allow electronic timing control of the inlet cam.
The kit comes with 260° inlet cam with 9.15mm lift which can be usd with normal valvesprings. As shown in the first pic there are also hoses, Earl's fittings and a number of specially designed billet aluminium parts.
Recommended retail is $3499 including GST.
To complete the kit you need a Nissan RB25 Neo NVCS inlet pulley and solenoid. We can supply the new Nissan parts for $850 or used parts can be utilised as shown in pic 2.
Once fitted the valve timing can be controlled by almost any aftermarket ECU. Testing in Japan showed 700hp at the engine with excellent midrange response from a T04Z turbo. We are currently conducting local testing which we will post up soon.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/448677-new-rb26-vcam-in-let-setup-3000/
Share on other sites

Good price considering HKS Step 1 & 2 is around 5k and Pro version at 7k and that's not including freight.

Paul I knew you'd be sniffing around at this ;)

When I spoke to Yavuz about doing something similar, he said it was a head off job. Something to do with the oil feed for the rb25 gear. The HKS v cam you can see an external feed line which would be tapped in somewhere on the intake side I would assume.

can confirm that you install with the head on

oil pressure feed replaces the rubber half moon on the rear of inlet side( against the fire wall)

seems pretty easy actually looking at the disructions, i am sure tunning will be interesting

will be interesting if they can match it to the exhaust cam

  • Like 1

"Recommended retail is $3499 including GST.

To complete the kit you need a Nissan RB25 Neo NVCS inlet pulley and solenoid. We can supply the new Nissan parts for $850 or used parts can be utilised as shown in pic 2."

So ontop of the $3,000 for the group buy you still have to source the inlet pulley and solenoid?

you may need to read the first post

but yes you have to buy those parts of a busted rb25neo or new for 800

i sold a whole neo head for 400 a few weeks ago so they r out there ( wish i kept it for this)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...