Jump to content
SAU Community

S2 Front Suspension Removal

DaveB

By DaveB,
in Four Door Family & Wagoneers

 Share

Recommended Posts

DaveB Mentor

DaveB

Posted
Posted

Hi,

This probably belongs in the suspension thread, but it gets pretty busy there.

So this is probably a silly question: is it safe to remove the front spring/strut combination (Bilstein lowered, SK spec' with circlip grooves) without compressing the springs with spring compressors? Like, just undo the bolts and remove the assembly complete, with only the shock shaft nut to contain the spring preload? SK mentions "spring compressors are essential" here but I'm not sure if he just means to get the springs onto the strut and get the top hats on. It would make things much easier if I didn't have to use spring compressors to remove the strut from the car (it's hard to fit two on the spring while it's on the car).

I'm just a little iffy about the few hundred kilos of force stored up in that spring, being retained with a little tiny bolt lol.

cheers

DaveB

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/449307-s2-front-suspension-removal/
Share on other sites
Lakes101 Experienced

Lakes101

Posted
Posted

No spring compressors are needed to remove the strut assembly from the car just jak the car up and Jack up under the hub to tack up the slack of the lad then undo top strut bolts in the engine bay and lower the strut and undo lower bolts to remove strut assembly pretty easy all in all.

zoomzoom Mentor

zoomzoom

Posted
Posted

Yep its "safe" to remove the whole assembly with just the nut holding the springs. As you say it is only containing the spring preload, not the full compressed force. However its not like I would hold it towards my face and stare at it for any length of time.

The riskiest part is going to be the use of spring compressors, since the spring is tapered. It is difficult (for me it was impossible) to only use 2 wide grip compressors. I had to use a couple of extra "death sticks" to compress the spring all round safely. If you know of anyone at suspension shops, it would be a good time to call in a favour and use their professional compressors.

Also its probably a good time to get a good new dust boot. Im using dirtbike ones. Also, the rubber donuts that sit between the strut piston and strut mount degrade and crack over time, especially when you get new hard shocks. Possibly some polyurethane sway bar bushes would work.

DaveB Mentor

DaveB

Posted
  • Author
Posted

No spring compressors are needed to remove the strut assembly from the car just jak the car up and Jack up under the hub to tack up the slack of the lad then undo top strut bolts in the engine bay and lower the strut and undo lower bolts to remove strut assembly pretty easy all in all.

Cheers, yes I've done it several times, it's just when I do my 4WD stagea I use spring compressors, and that's a pain.

Yep its "safe" to remove the whole assembly with just the nut holding the springs. As you say it is only containing the spring preload, not the full compressed force. However its not like I would hold it towards my face and stare at it for any length of time.

The riskiest part is going to be the use of spring compressors, since the spring is tapered. It is difficult (for me it was impossible) to only use 2 wide grip compressors. I had to use a couple of extra "death sticks" to compress the spring all round safely. If you know of anyone at suspension shops, it would be a good time to call in a favour and use their professional compressors.

Also its probably a good time to get a good new dust boot. Im using dirtbike ones. Also, the rubber donuts that sit between the strut piston and strut mount degrade and crack over time, especially when you get new hard shocks. Possibly some polyurethane sway bar bushes would work.

Lol! I hate handling them.

Thanks guys, great to hear that it should be OK to let the nut trap the spring and not worry about the spring compressors. The pre-load must be pretty high though - I'd hate for one to let one go.

Duncan Grand Master

Duncan

Posted
Posted

actually there can be very little or even no preload depending on the spring length and ride height, that's why a lot of springs rattle and why some people need helper springs to keep it all preloaded.

I still wouldn't take the top hat off without spring compressors unless I was sure there was no preload, that would be quite exciting :)

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Duncan
      Thanks Santa (the neverending trials of the 400,000klm, 400kw, RB30, manual swapped Stagea)

      By Duncan · Posted

      Looks like they've been through a few versions of the kit; that is not the one I had trouble with (it had the level sender attached to baffles on the floor, the one you linked the level sender is hung from the hat). One obvious point about that kit is it has no baffles at all, not even the factory setup (although it looks like you can retain the factory setup if you want).  Not sure if that will be an issue or not, the good news is it looks like you can get the pump nice and low in the tank, but that doesn't help if the fuel is all sloshing to one side of a wide flat tank
    • soviet_merlin
      Thanks Santa (the neverending trials of the 400,000klm, 400kw, RB30, manual swapped Stagea)

      By soviet_merlin · Posted

      One more question if you don't mind. Is the first kit you tried the same one as they currently sell as their fuel-pump-hanger kit? https://frenchysperformancegarage.com/collections/fuel-system-kits/products/fpg-bnr32-fuel-pump-hanger-kit-single-fits-stagea-c34-nissan-skyline-gt-r-r32-fpg-087?variant=42131478315186 Because according to their video the low fuel warning thing can be taken from the OEM hanger and attached to their new hanger. Just wondering whether this is the kit you weren't happy with, or whether it's a different revision. Thanks again!
    • Duncan
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Duncan · Posted

      That's the thing....the basics of fuel and ignition are deceptively simple.....getting it to behave like factory in all conditions after airflow mods is way more complex. Newer cars like the V37 are all about modifying the standard ECU which is about a billion times more complex than they were 20 years ago, with a bunch of parameters affecting others
    • The Bogan
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By The Bogan · Posted

      The larger TB I had on the SS was a pain to get to idle right, but, that was cable In the end they just raised the idle up a couple of hundred RPM so it was happy idling away either in gear or in park (slush box life) I'm curious on how my NC will idle with the new intake, larger TB, and cams that are currently going in/on, but I have faith that MX5 Mania will sort this "electronical" "black magic" out the best they can in the tune with a electronic TB Sometimes I wish I knew more about the intricacies of tuning, but most of the time I don't because I know it would hurt my brain 🤣
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      That's the thing. Cam is smaller than before.. though the old cam was +6 degrees advanced. We're talking huge changes here, the narrowbands want to trim out 20% of fuel and pull the (wideband) idle to like 16.0 AFR or such. One side is a little more trimmy than the other. Think along the lines of ~20% to ~15-18%. Unfortunately my scouring of the internet hasn't really found anyone with this issue. People either just disable NB's or have them wildly different, where one is -20% and the other is +20 or 0 (i.e a sensor is just dead/wiring is just busted). Turning them off and relying on the base map only results in the wideband reporting at about 14.0 with the Varex closed. It'd be a little leaner (closer to 14.7ish) with the Varex open. I know I can just change the switch points so that the narrowbands agree with the wideband, but it's still odd. Both of them are reading voltage, it's just that they're reading quite high mv, in the ~800 region. It's just odd. This was with the IAT fudged to report it was about ~22 degrees which is my guesstimation of the temperature in the room. I have an OEM sensor ready to try tonight, which is slow and crap - but .. worked last time I used it. Sadly I am aware that idle tuning with the big TB is going to be a PITA and I look 'forward' to many hours spent stalling or stumbling idle or delving into drivability things.
×
×
  • Create New...