Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Protection of the Environment Operations (Noise Control) Regulation 2000


Schedule 2 Testing procedures

(Clause 54)

Part 1 Motor cars, motor cycles, motor lorries and motor buses

Division 1 General

1 Definitions

In this Part:
diesel engine
means an internal combustion engine which operates on the compression-ignition principle.

engine speed at maximum power (ESMP)
means the speed at which the engine develops maximum power (r/min).

spark ignition
means positive ignition.

2 Measuring instruments

(1) A Type 1 sound level meter complying at least with AS 1259.1, concerning the characteristics of sound level meters, must be used. Measurements must be carried out using A-weighted frequency levels set at “fast”.

(2) The sound level meter must be calibrated against an acoustic calibrator immediately before and after each series of test runs. If the meter readings obtained from these calibrations differ by more than l dB(A) the test is to be considered invalid.

(3) The rotational speed of the engine is to be measured by an external tachometer whose accuracy is within 3% or, where an external tachometer cannot reasonably be used, the vehicle’s tachometer.

(4) In this clause,
AS 1259.1
means the document numbered “AS 1259.1—1990”, published in 1990 by Standards Australia entitled
Acoustics—Sound level meters—Non-integrating
, as in force on 1 September 2000.

3 Test site ambient requirements

(1) The measurements must be made in the open air where both the ambient and wind noise levels are at least 10 dB(A) below the noise level being measured. The site may take the form of an open space or beneath a canopy if no part of the canopy or its supports is within 3 m of the microphone being used for the measurement.

The test site within 3 m of the microphone must be substantially flat and may include kerbs, channels, gutter, poles or other objects that in the opinion of the authorised officer do not provide acoustic reflection sufficient to substantially affect the measurement. However, in no case is the microphone to be placed within 200 mm of any article or object.

(2) Any sound peak which appears to be unrelated to the characteristics of the vehicle is to be ignored in taking the measurements. If a windscreen is used, its influence on the sensitivity and the directional characteristics of the microphone must be taken into account.

(3) While testing is in progress no person other than the authorised officer must be within 1 m of the microphone in use. No person other than the authorised officer and an observer, the driver or owner of the vehicle or, in the case of a motorcycle, the rider is to be within 3 m of the microphone in use. No object (except as provided in subclause (1)) other than the vehicle, any trailer attached to the vehicle or any part of the vehicle being measured, the contents of the vehicle being measured or the objects necessary for the making of the measurements is to be within 3 m of the microphone in use.

(4) Before the measurements are begun, the authorised officer must ensure that the engine of the vehicle is sufficiently warm to allow the noise measurements to be carried out.

Division 2 Test method for motor cars

4 Microphone position

(1) The microphone must be directed towards the orifice of the exhaust outlet and must be supported by a tripod or similar device not providing excessive acoustic reflection. The general requirements for positioning microphones are shown in Figure 1 at the end of this Schedule.

(2) The nominal axis of maximum sensitivity of the microphone must be substantially parallel to the test site surface and must make an angle of 45 degrees ± 10 degrees with the principal direction of gas flow from the exhaust.

(3) In selecting the 45 degree alignment from the outlet of a motor vehicle fitted with two or more outlets, only the angle resulting in the microphone being farthest from any other outlet must be used.

(4) The height of the microphone above the test site surface must, in the opinion of the authorised officer, be substantially equal to that of the orifice of the exhaust outlet but must not be less than 200 mm above the test site surface.

(5) The distance of the microphone from the exhaust outlet orifice must not be less than 500 mm.

(6) For vehicles fitted with one exhaust outlet, the microphone must be placed so that the greatest possible distance is achieved between it and the vehicle within the configuration shown on Figure 1 at the end of this Schedule.

(7) For vehicles fitted with two or more exhaust outlets spaced less than 500 mm apart and connected to a single silencer, only one microphone position is to be used. That position must be selected in accordance with the procedure described in the preceding subclauses in respect of an exhaust outlet which results in the greatest possible distance from the vehicle.

(8) For vehicles fitted with two or more exhaust outlets connected to separate silencers or spaced more than 500 mm apart, each exhaust outlet must be treated separately as if it were the only one.

(9) Despite anything to the contrary in subclauses (1) to (8), if the microphone positioning procedures result in no suitable position due to an obstruction being part of the vehicle or in an obstruction being directly between the microphone and the exhaust outlet, the requirements of subclauses (2) and (3) may be varied.

(10) Despite subclauses (1) to (9), if the microphone is to be placed so that it is less than 500 mm from the engine then the angle between the direction of gas flow and the angle of the nominal maximum sensitivity of the microphone may be altered so that the microphone is more than 500 mm from the engine.

5 Vehicle operation and noise measurement

(1) The vehicle must be stationary with the transmission in “neutral” or, in the case of a vehicle with automatic transmission, with the gear selector in the “park” position if such a position is provided.

(2) The engine of the vehicle is to be operated in accordance with one of the following procedures:
(a) If the ESMP for that engine has been determined by the EPA—the engine is to be brought to and stabilised at a speed as close to 3/4 ESMP as the testing officer can achieve.

(B) If the ESMP for that engine has not been determined by the EPA—the engine is to be brought to and stabilised at a speed as close as the authorised officer can achieve to one of the following speeds:
(i) if the engine has 5 cylinders or less—4000 rpm,

(ii) if the engine has 6 cylinders—3200 rpm,

(iii) if the engine has 8 cylinders—3300 rpm,

(iv) if the engine has more than 8 cylinders—4300 rpm,

(v) if the engine is a rotary engine—4500 rpm.

© If, in the opinion of the authorised officer, the test speed determined by reference to paragraphs (a) and (B) is not attainable by the engine—the engine is to be brought to and stabilised at the maximum speed that the authorised officer believes that the engine can be safely tested.

(d) A single noise level measurement is then to be made.

(3) The specified procedure is to be repeated until such number of readings, each within a range of 1 dB(A), as the authorised officer considers appropriate have been made. For the purposes of this clause non-integer decibel readings are to be rounded downwards to the nearest whole decibel.

6 Interpretation of results

(1) If one microphone position is used, the noise level of the vehicle is the arithmetic mean of the readings specified in clause 5 (3).

(2) When the noise level of the vehicle has been calculated, non-integer results are to be rounded down to the nearest whole decibel.

(3) If more than one microphone position is used, the noise level at each microphone position is to be determined as if it were the only one. The noise level of the vehicle is the higher or highest noise level so calculated.

(4) If the microphone position is less than 1 m from the engine compartment of the vehicle, the calculated noise level is to be reduced by 2 dB(A).
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44936-epa-noise-limit-testing-procedure/
Share on other sites

This is for NSW by the way.

The noise limit is 90 dB.

The on the spot fines are:

Up to 5 dB over - $150

5 to 15 dB over - $250

More than 15 dB over - $500

They can choose whether to give you this or take you to court.

At court the maximums are:

Up to 5 dB over - 50 penalty units at $110 each = $5,500

5 to 15 dB over - 75 penalty units at $110 each = $8,250

More than 15 dB over - 150 penalty units at $110 each = $16,500

Whoever knows FOR SURE at what rpm their car makes peak power in standard form please post here. Don't post stuff like I think maybe this or I heard that. Let's try to keep this thread clean and informative.

We should try to get peak power rpm for every relevant car; ie R32, R33, R34 GSTS's, GTT's, GTR's etc.

Something interesting. Note the use of the word MAY. "An authorised officer... MAY also affix..."

27 Defective vehicle labels

(1) An authorised officer who issues a defective vehicle notice for a motor vehicle may also affix a defective vehicle label to the inside or outside of the front windscreen of the motor vehicle or in a conspicuous position on some other part of the vehicle.

Excellent post Adam. I haven't seen a stock dyno graph lately but since they specify 3,300rpm or 3/4 of maximum power, 3,300 must be lower and therefore quieter. For 3,300 to be higher ESMP would have to be under 4,400rpm...no way is it that low.

http://www.gtr.co.uk/html/technical/index.asp

has stock specs for GTR's

This would explain why i've read people saying 'they only tested mine at 3200rpm' and people saying 'they tested mine at 6000rpm' if they know the max rpm, they would work it out to be 5500-6000, if they don' then they do it at 3200rpm?

GTR makes maximum power at 6800 rpm x 75% = Supposed to be tested at 5100 rpm.

GTS-T makes maximum power at 6400 rpm x 75% = Supposed to be tested at 4800 rpm.

It seems that if the tester do not have this info at hand, you are lucky and get tested at 3200 rpm.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's excellent but I'm still breaking it in so I'm not 100% sure where it'll end up. I would say it's about 15% heavier than stock and the smoothness of the slip zone is quite progressive but you need to be a little patient compared to stock or it'll bite hard and stall. Stock I got away with absolutely horrid clutch control. Like I said before I couldn't even tell where the clutch would grab when it was stock so releasing way too quickly without enough revs it would just slip and the revs would drop lower than ideal but that would be the end of it. Currently there's a bit of a nasty clutch judder if I don't apply enough revs + find the exact wrong point of the slip point in the clutch pedal but it feels like it's slowly resolving as I drive it more. I would not recommend the competition clutch unless you really need the extra clamp force. I think this clutch combined with the Nismo operating cylinder is going to be exactly what I want. Enough bite that you need to remember the release point to avoid stalling or rough shifts, but progressive enough that it's not hard to drive by any means and not heavy at all. I tried a "super single" clutch on my friend's 997.2 Turbo 6MT and that was absolutely horrid. It runs an electrohydraulic power steering pump for the clutch power boost so there's zero feedback in the clutch pedal and there was a horrific clutch shudder well after break-in due to the lack of marcel springs or hub springs in the friction disk. It felt like the slip zone was the thickness of a single toe twitch as well so it was almost impossible to avoid stalling it unless you gave it a ton of revs and just dumped the clutch instead of trying to be smooth with it. I was terrified of pulling out in front of traffic. I have also tried some kind of "super single" on an EK9 and that makes this twin plate Coppermix look like a stock clutch. Releasing the clutch pedal even slightly too quickly feels like you're getting rear-ended. The pedal is extremely heavy as well and there's no vacuum assist like the GTR.
    • Yeah, well I was probably way underguessing the $300 figure anyway. Just multiplied a "normal" by 4 for the purposes of pointing out it's not cheap, particularly if it has to be repeated.
    • We have an alignment shop out here that does what you're talking about but he wants like 800 AUD a pop. DIY is "cheaper" but once you start accounting for the value of your time I'm not sure it's worth it.
    • The main catch phrase for any car is "the eye of the beholder", and "personal tastes and preferences" And as for the plastic "flares", I honestly think they look cheap and tacky, and I cannot see them aging well, maybe if they were body colour they might look better to my eyes, but, I would still prefer it the were more like the older WRX STI models that had the wider body metal panels In saying all this 5hit, I wouldn't buy a new WRX again, even if it had the wide body metal panels    
×
×
  • Create New...