Jump to content
SAU Community

Have You Successfully Fitted A Raspberry Pi To Your Factory Tv/nav System


Recommended Posts

Has anyone actually hooked up a Raspberry Pi and been happy with the results.


Why I ask, is I have a 2005 stagea M35 with factory Nav/TV etc and connected my Raspberry Pi via the aux input at the factory TV tuner box in the rear left quarter.


I have tried two different ways to connect the Raspberry Pi, one via the analogue video output using RCA cable and 3.5 phone jack for sound out connected directly to the aux ( VTR ) input.


This gave me a good sound, but picture quality on the factory screen was fairly poor.


The other method was using HDMI output from the Raspberry Pi then via a HDMI to composite adaptor out to the aux ( VTR ) input again. Results again were much the same, good sound, but picture quality was average.


I'm using XBMC on my Raspberry Pi.


I would like to get this so the picture is of good enough quality that I can easily read the words on the screen without them being a little fussy and very small.


I guessing this may be a case of changing settings in the workings of XBMC maybe, but as of yet I have not managed to be able to change the screen resolution size to see any difference in what I see on the small car screen.


I know if I changed the screen to one that had HDMI input, that I would get a lot better screen picture, but I would think the factory screen would still give reasonable results.


Before anybody suggests taking my car to see who ever, I just wish to point out that I'm in New Zealand.


I'm happy to change any wiring, or direct link something into the factory tv tuner if that is needed.


Any help with this would be much appreciated.



Rotaman


  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...

I'm looking at this, but I am hoping to replace the screen with something more modern. the standard screen is 5.5" diagonal, which is an unusual size. Fitting a 4.3" would be easy but a backwards step in size. 7" seems just a bit too big to make it fit.. and there's not really anything in between.

otherwise if you can get a decent result with the factory screen, it's a good size so i'd be happy to leave it. haven't tried pulling mine apart yet. I'm on the lookout for a spare TV unit to try replacing the screen as above.. don't feel like leaving a hole in my dash while I mess around :P

where does the composite video input plug in for the screen?

Geoff,

Screen is a sharp or Panasonic in the m35 from memory.

It needs a data feed to fire it as there are 4 inputs that need to be setup.

The 34 is a 5.8" unit and easier as it is a sharp unit. I have the datasheet for that one and if you can generate RGBS then you are on your way. That unit is a twin input with a logic trigger to select it.

This is a later motorized screen. Similar idea. Toshiba supplied. The board supplies all of the signals to run it.

post-2209-0-09028200-1417336306_thumb.jpg

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 馃槂
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
    • You talking about the ones in the photo above? I guess that could make sense. Fixed (but flexible) line from the point up above down to the hubcap thingo, with a rotating air seal thingo. Then fixed (but also still likely flexible) line from the "other side" of the transfer in the hub cap thingo up to the valve stem on the rim. A horrible cludge, but something that could be done. I'd bet on the Unimog version being fed through from the back, as part of the axle assembly, without the need for the vulnerable lines out to the sides. It's amazing what you can do when you have an idea that is not quite impossible. Nearly impossible, but not quite.
  • Create New...