Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

Been reading up on fuel line size in the forums here and it seems that 5/16ths size line which is about 8mm ID, (ie, standard skyline size) seems to be sufficient for 500 - 550hp plus. (This will be my target)

Just want to ask if anyone sees any issues with the following..

My feed to the fuel rail from a Walbro 460lph will be 5/16ths rubber hose from the pump to the hard line under the car and rubber hose again to the rail.

Rail to reg is also 5/16th and reg back to tank is 5/16th split into 2x 1/4" hard lines. (original carby setup)

All other overflow and feed lines are also 5/16th.

Only issue that I'm concerned with is that I believe the Walbro 460s have a 3/8th outlet and I didn't want to downsize from 3/8th to 5/16th after the filter... Will this be an issue??

Thanks for the feedback in advance..

G

The 460's outlet can squeeze into the 5/16 hose with a little persuasion. My evo runs 6mm return with the same pump, you will have no issues.

Make sure you check the fuel pressure if keeping the stock reg to make sure it doesn't skyrocket. I have only ever fitted one using the Nismo reg, and I know the stock s15 one can't flow enough.

Hey Scotty, no worries and thank you for your help throughout the recent months during my research on this. As you can understand, I don't want to get to my dyno slot and have overlooked something.

Using a sard reg so should be good.

As long as 5/16th lines can see over 500hp.. ill be happy.

As long as 5/16th lines can see over 500hp.. ill be happy.

I have made well over 400kw on factory lines, the only issue was the fuel filter in a few cases. Changing that to a 40 micron stainless mesh filter fixed any flow issues. Worst case just bypass the stock filter on the dyno.

I use GJ drivelines for the earls. Motorsport Connection is another a good supplier for Speedflow etc. Even Scotty's Customs usually keep one or two in stock for customers. :P

  • Like 1

I've just measured the inside diameter of the hardline running along my car and it's 6mm

Of course, 5/16th fuel line has an 8mm diameter and I am setup to run 5/16th from a walbro 460. I figured the hardline would be 8mm ID as well but now I am concerned I will have a flow issue.

Scotty, you've mentioned to me that 5/16th line will be fine but are the standard hardlines on a skyline 6mm ID as well?

This is interesting. Im planing on max 800hp thats to the crank. Will number 6 feed work for this goal and number 8 for the return. I have removed the hard line from my r32 gtr. Im planning on running the braided stuff.

I would be swapping the lines around, you want the larger one on the feed usually.

Power isn't the measurement, it depends only on your pump capacity. If you had a 2000hp pump you will need larger lines and reg.

Thats interesting. I always thought return line has to be bigger. Looking at the hydraulic machines at my work. All the return line are bigger. If the fpr can't return the fuel fast enough because the lines become the resistance and if that becomes the issue why have a fpr if it cant regulate the fuel pressure.

Can anyone else contest to this fact Hmmm.

Most regs only have a 2mm hole to return fuel, how could a 6mm line be a restriction if that's the case? Yes, the return is low pressure, but it won't be that much of a restriction. As long as the return can flow more than the reg needs to bypass (while the injectors are off) you are fine. Even better with the fuelab style reg which automatically slows the pump down.

More important than the return line size is to remove (or drill out) the vac generator from the fuel tank, as most cars have a restriction in there these days.

The guys at race car engineering recommend -6 fuel line to rail, -8 return to surge and even -10 surge overflow to tank.

All in the name of reducing pressure where you don't want it. Especially when using twin pumps that can handle some big flow.

If upgrading the lines then by all means, but sometimes you need to work with what's there from the factory.

My 6an return is fine running twin 255 Walbro's. If you can run 35psi at idle then your return is large enough, any larger is wasting cash.

Large single pumps require massive lines on the feed side though, to stop cavitation.

Im planing using 3 044 pumps. To supply my small 800cc injectors. I want to invest in a good fuel pump set up for future use. So ill spend some time looking at line sizes and the way it should set up. One trip at a high end car show should by itself lead to seeing other drag racing setups. I do feel that I should run a line that can flow my needs and more, but for some reason in my head I still feel my return should always be bigger than my feed line. But ill contact some drag racing shops and see whats going on when it comes to fuel setup.

Buying my cell and surge tank and using all the lines and fittings ill need I can see me running into 3k plus. I need to sit down and plan this out.

Does any one have the size and thread pitch for the feed and supply. Side of a bosch 044 pump. Thanks.

All good, but a drag setup won't suit if you plan to drive the car on the road. Those of us with fuel heating issues will warn you will require a large adjustable speed pump to keep fuel temps under control.

3 Bosch pumps will look the part, but you can max 1000's with a single Walbro on factory lines.

  • 2 weeks later...

Hmm. I would disagree to a point. I feel a wolbro pump doent have enough volume, now dont get me wrong here but why would you see all these big 044 pump setup im most peoplea trunks if it isnt needed and the hp goals are around 1000hp.

I ant think no single wolbro pump can do that. I do believe that variable pump would be better but never really have had any experience with them. And for the heat issue a cooler can easily be installed.

I have made well over 400kw on factory lines, the only issue was the fuel filter in a few cases. Changing that to a 40 micron stainless mesh filter fixed any flow issues. Worst case just bypass the stock filter on the dyno.

where are these filters available? Got a link or pic of one?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think this is just a product of how the US market works for this stuff. Shops are expensive and there's no real way of knowing what kind of results you're going to get, people don't really have the institutional knowledge. I have heard too much at this point to really put faith in anybody "full service" except maybe DSport and they aren't really a full service kind of shop. If you go to the right place I have no doubt they'll get it right for you. Some locals have set it up right but the cost really is nuts and even now they're still fighting issues. And you know I'm a crazy person who thinks things like twin scroll, relatively short low-mount cast headers, PCV recirc to intake, recirculating BOV, right-sized for ~400 whp, MAF load, validating all of that to a standard comparable to OEM test programs, etc are relevant. For what it's worth, multiple local owners at this point have been stuck in a perpetual cycle of blowing a motor -> getting someone to rebuild it -> some missed detail causes the bearings to wipe and spin just outside of break-in mileage or drop valves or some other catastrophe -> cycle repeats. I usually only find out about this because I'm perpetually helping random friends with diagnosing car troubles, Skyline or otherwise. The single turbo stuff if I'm honest is mostly secondary, it just doesn't seem to achieve the numbers in the ~2000-3000 rpm region that I would expect given the results I've seen here or in Motive's videos. I don't really know what we're missing here in the US to be causing this. Lots of people like to emphasize the necessity of finishing the project first and foremost, but I'm not made of money and I can't afford to be trashing a 15k+ USD engine build with any regularity. Or spending my relatively limited garage time these days unable to triangulate problems because too much was changed all at once. Also, even if it isn't a catastrophic failure I would consider spending the cost of single turbo conversion with nothing to show for it to be pretty bad. 
    • The water pump is know to leak as well. So if the coolant is low checking that first as well as hoses. 
    • Reading your posts Josh, sometimes I feel like I've gone in a time machine back to the 90's when everyone was doe-eyed and figuring things out for the first time.  I've lost track of how many single turbo GTR's I've seen on track that haven't burnt down lol. Everything has been figured out a long time ago. These things are at the point now where its essentially turn-key to go single turbo. 
    • Among other things yes. Making sure to either use an oil pressure regulator or the right restrictor size for your oil pump/range of oil viscosities you intend to run, making sure you plumb the lines correctly, turbo should be placed such that it siphons properly even when the water pump isn't turning so you don't boil coolant in the turbo after shutdown, oil return should be low resistance and also preferably picking the one that is most likely to return to the pickup as opposed to some other irrelevant part of the pan. It's far from impossible to figure this out but I have seen people really, really struggle and if that's the case it's easier to just take the path of least resistance. To me, bolt-on twin turbos are a fixed cost whereas single turbo is almost unbounded.
    • Latest round of updates on the car. I purchased and installed a SWS clutch slipper to help with 60ft times and got some second-hand good condition 275/40R17 Hoosier DR2 radials. Test and tune in November showed the tyres were an upgrade over my over 15 year old mickey Thompson's and I got a 1.8 second 60ft and pb et of 11.71 but even then, that run wasn't great due to rain and driver error (the event got called off 10 minutes later fast forward to the weekend just gone 25th of Jan and there was finally a break in the weather to let racing happen. The first run the track was slippery and only managed a 12.1@129 Second run the track was better and got a new pb et and mph: 11.54@131   Lith and I then worked out that I installed the previously mentioned clutch slipper incorrectly and its never been working, and I had just been dumping the clutch the entire time, we also noticed it was on street boost and not race boost. So I lined up for a third run with the car turned up in the first two gears, but the passengers side axle objected to clutch dumps and left the chat which stopped my weekend.   so there will be another attempt in the future once I replace the tyres as they rubbed and are stuffed now. but a low 11 should be on the cards.
×
×
  • Create New...