Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I found the stock specs of the NEO turbo cams, they aren't to bad from factory, I'd start at 7 deg advanced on intake and 5 deg retarded on exhaust and tune from there

Otherwise the 252s would be better for response then the 260s

Just realised you have VCT on inlet so no adjusting there :(

  On 03/01/2015 at 7:41 AM, XKLABA said:

Type As are 252 in and ex

Type Bs are 260 in and ex

http://www.rhdjapan.com/tomei-camshafts-poncam-rb25de-t.html

Wow. WTF am I thinking about. ... I'm sure it was tomei. Oh well.

  On 03/01/2015 at 7:26 AM, XKLABA said:

I found the stock specs of the NEO turbo cams, they aren't to bad from factory, I'd start at 7 deg advanced on intake and 5 deg retarded on exhaust and tune from there

Otherwise the 252s would be better for response then the 260s

Just realised you have VCT on inlet so no adjusting there :(

Pretty sure ben has a way of easily adjusting intake cam on neo that im going to look into, How do you feel the 252s would affect midrange and response?

  On 03/01/2015 at 8:29 AM, BlackBox said:

Pretty sure ben has a way of easily adjusting intake cam on neo that im going to look into, How do you feel the 252s would affect midrange and response?

It would be better then type bs

  On 03/01/2015 at 9:03 AM, r32-25t said:

34geeteetee is making 395rwkw with the factory cams in his r34, so really you should save your money and put it towards something more useful

I am under the impression he is using tomei B cams? He is also using E85 which is not an option for me.

It is not a case of saving money or not, i have already purchased type B cams, springs, retainers shims etc.. If it is going to make an Improvement then i might as well do it, but if it is going to be considered a performance Decrease then i should bin the cams for something more suitable.

Perhaps i should start a new thread so i don't derail OP's any further. I am looking more for NEO, specific advise, im not convinced results from rb25 or r33 rb25 would mimic results of the neo

You will see a 10kw gain in the top the issue is will you lose anything in the bottom end and how much!

Cause you'll be surprised the difference losing power from the bottom of the range makes to the overall driving experience

And seriously 10kw can be had by screwing in another 1-2psi of boost and is a lot cheaper that way

  • Like 1
  On 03/01/2015 at 9:03 AM, r32-25t said:

34geeteetee is making 395rwkw with the factory cams in his r34, so really you should save your money and put it towards something more useful

I need to check that.

I'm 99 percent sure he is using type b cams and has raved about them.

Edited by Ben C34
  Quote
Peak Power Comparison

(for Stock Cat. Equiped Cars)

TYPE A 405 ps
  Quote
TYPE B 406.33 ps
  Quote
TYPE R 404.65 ps

So at just over 400ps you make under 2hp less but some on here say lag can improve by 800rpm... I wonder what the difference in power is like at 700ps and 8500rpm

I currently have Grex (Trust) drop in cams that came with the car, as far as I'm aware they came in either 256/256 or 264/264 9.1. Always pondered how much I would kill top end power with the Tomei Type-R, can always do with more midrange :)

Edited by SimonR32
  On 05/01/2015 at 8:19 AM, Ben C34 said:

That's an interesting comparison but who uses a stock cat?

That's holding back the bigger cams so not a true comparison in my opinion.

Tomei Test car...

http://www.tomeiusa.com/_2003web-catalogue/e070_cam_RB26.html

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How to wreak havoc at a bogans party... Swap out the goon bag hanging from the clothes line with oil bag... Watch chaos ensue during Goon of Fortune....
    • Hey everyone,   I’m looking for some advice on replacing the timing belt on my RB25DET Neo-powered 1998 Skyline. The engine was fully built about five years ago, including a fresh timing belt, water pump, and other essentials. However, since then, the car has only covered around 2,000–3,000 miles. It’s currently making around 650hp.   Even though the mileage is low, I know timing belts have a time-based lifespan too, and most recommendations suggest changing them every five to six years or 50,000 miles. Since I’m at that time mark, I’d rather not take any risks and plan to swap it out soon.   A few things I’d like to hear opinions on: 1. What’s the best belt for this setup? Should I go with an OEM Nissan belt, or is the HKS fine-tune a better choice given the power level? 2. Would you bother replacing the idler pulley and tensioner at the same time, or only if they show wear? 3. When swapping the belt, is it necessary to lock the cam and crank gears in place, or is lining up the timing marks enough? I’ve seen different approaches, and I want to make sure I do it right.   The water pump was changed with the rebuild and isn’t run off the timing belt, so I don’t see a need to replace it again. I just want to make sure I approach this the right way.   Any insight would be much appreciated. Thanks!
    • How does this compare to the internally gated g25-550 in terms of power production at same psi and spool
    • Did you find that your voltage of the battery wasn't where it's normally supposed to be? for example on my r34, it's at 14.5v when running after a few seconds, but I noticed when I had a rough start and it initially wasn't idling correctly, the voltage on my triple gauge cluster was showing lower than usual. Seems like the alternator is starting to crap itself
×
×
  • Create New...