Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I remember reading somewhere that there were a couple variants of the HKS GT2530's as well as the KAI model. I'm assuming this means HKS updated them along the way, does anyone know if this is true and if so what are the difference and how could each be identified?

Any info would be greatly appreciated

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/451492-hks-gt2530-variants/
Share on other sites

all share the same CHRA/wheels except the kai.

Housings differed like mentioned.

RB26 housings also differed mainly on exh side, early had no splitter late had a splitter on the outlet that was flush to the outlet flange. Apart from that some minor gate differences

No real power difference if your using a 1-1.5'' wastegate separator in a bellmouth

They should all be using the same cartridge and wheels 446179-21 from memory . I seem to remember the KAI version having a port shrouded compressor housing so was likely a single turbo version . The main unique part today is the 60mm 63T compressor wheel and I think it was only ever used in 2530s and one other app I can't remember .

You can turn any GT2860 with the same turbine into a 2530 if you have the original undamaged compressor wheel and housing . Swap the wheel in balance and bingo new guts .

A .

I remember reading somewhere that there were a couple variants of the HKS GT2530's as well as the KAI model. I'm assuming this means HKS updated them along the way, does anyone know if this is true and if so what are the difference and how could each be identified?

Any info would be greatly appreciated

why do you ask? perhaps if we had a bit more info on the specifics of what ur trying to find out it would help...

why do you ask? perhaps if we had a bit more info on the specifics of what ur trying to find out it would help...

I'm gathering parts for a turbo upgrade. I'll be looking for roughly a safe 320rwkw but more power down the track so I'd like to get the right turbos from now, hence why I'm looking at the 2530's. I know -7's or even -9's would be better suited to that 300+ mark but any more power later on will be maxing them out. So I guess at the moment I'm just trying to educate myself on my options.

Just get the -9s.

Sell the -9s if you ever decide to go for 400rwkw and get 2530s in 2/3/4 years (or more) and enjoy the -9s for their application for now because realistically 2530s is motor out/rebuild time anyway. So changing turbos isn't a big expense.

  • Like 1

Might also depend on your demographic, i.e Sydney lots of 40/50klm zones and not much

in the way of over 80klm higher load gears, a few hundred rpm of boost threshold and

less off boost power can make driving around on bigger turbos tedious.

The opposite if you live in an area with lots of open roads or highways. I.e rural or

the US. You can get away with larger turbos since you are mostly above 80klms with

very little time spent in stop start traffic and low speed pot holed filled corners,

stupid 40klm school zones with not a single kid in sight. In this case you can go

for the -5 or 2530's and just not spend enough time off the boil to care.

End of the day, it still comes down to drivability first as the main consideration

on size, then peak power goals.

I will tell you my experience. I had a unopened motor with -5's and they were a little laggy (running 345kw atw) but on the open road they are great. In the city not to much (as above).

When I rebuilt the motor and did head work now pushing 400kw the -5's have come alive. Still running 2.6L and they are more than fun anywhere haha. I wouldn't waste money getting 2 different sets of turbos (selling one for a loss later) if you plan to rebuild. Go for a set you want to keep deal with the lag at first then benefit later when you rebuild. Less cost when you do rebuild.

Also as Jeremy Clarkson said - lag can be fun at the lights when people think they are winning then they wonder where you have gone.

Yeah I do see where you're coming from but would the -9s be that much better than the 2530s for my goal that you can justify doing it twice?

Absolutely. Turbos are the most important thing to choose. They decide everything in a set-up in a stock-ish scenario.
You are talking about $1,200 or so. So like I said if you plan on not rebuilding etc for 2 years or more - then change it out when the time comes.
I've had both -9, -5s and modified -9s... The -5s around town, hill runs, motorkhana etc as stated, are tedious on a 2.6l. -9s win for a car doing that type of work hands down.
-5s come into their own above 120km/h-150km/h+. You just gotta ask yourself how much time are you spending above that? And go from there.

Would HKS GT-SS's be an even better option?
Thanks for all the help guys

Much more research needed. The Garrett -9s and HKS GT-SS are the same turbo, just a different branding. HKS "kit" just comes with everything you need to bolt on, oh and a much higher price tag.

For my project the motor will be just one aspect in a sort of complete rebuild with suspension next and ultimately paint and interior so I think what ever set up I go for now will pretty much be it for a while (providing the motor doesn't give up). Having said that though I do miss the punch my 33 GTST used to give so maybe that little bit of lag given by the -5 will be enjoyable but I definitely don't want to have to go 120km+ whilst ringing it's nuts for the turbos to show what they've got. My best bet would be to experience most, if not all of my options first hand.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • have no doubt and wanted too trust me and may regret later not necessarily worried about weight (would be 8 kg ish total) it was more the $$ to do it properly is about $6 - $7K in hardwear need long 310mm stroke jacks etc - plus install and call me whatever im not doing it myself even if wanted too cant weld etc  - thats $10K installed vs fraction of that cost while Ive spent some money on this POS I actually really dont like doing so unless its got a large chance to make me go faster 😁 hey in still carting this things around on a 15 yr old rusted open trailer so I can spend on racing not buy a new trailer to look better the manual jacks Ive had done are heavy and take space but are transportable and usable anywhere - taking or organizing even compressed air let alone nitrogen which is more whats needed coming from Perth to Winton or Sydney or the like honestly just adds to my brain headaches/ hurts of organisation also ha 15 mins job will get down to 2 - 5 min job vs 1 min job for airjacks - all tradeoffs I spose
    • Purely out of curiosity, how do you know all this @dbm7? Do you work with automatic gearboxes professionally? This goes way way way beyond "I've had an automatic Skyline once and did some mucking around"
    • I'll just reiterate that it's best to do all the wiring diagnostics, before even thinking about buying replacement solenoids ~ that is, be absolutely sure the solenoid is bad.....ie; bad connector(s), rodents chewed through a wire, etc etc. If you don't so this, you can fork out all the money for solenoids, only to find something else is wrong (this'll make you cry if you pull the valvebody only to find a broken wire is at fault... ...some more glue on the solenoid packs -- this is the RE5R01A shift solenoid assembly.... ...these are all shift solenoids ~ ostensibly they're the same as the shift solenoids from the 4-speed auto.... ...this is the RE4R01A solenoid set... ...with these, you have 3 shift solenoids attached to the plate, and the separate solenoid is the EPC solenoid (line pressure control) -- with both designs, the TC lockup clutch solenoid (also PWM so they could slide the clutch shut), is located on the lower valvebody half.... ...(story time)...back in the 90's, it was a common fault that the EPC solenoid (or TC-lock solenoid) would fail, but Nissan only sold them as part of the assembly (think ~$350 at the time) ~ thing was, Isuzu also used these boxes in light commercials, and you could buy the PWM solenoid as a separate part, so it was possible to buy/use that solenoid (around $65), and make it fit (remove the circlip, fit to old plate and deal with wiring)...making it a more cost effective repair. I've not seen the RE5R01A shift solenoid assembly, but with the 4-speed RE4R01A it was possible to hack/fit a single shift solenoid onto an other working set, using a donor solenoid from another set with failed EPC....(by rights the whole set should be replaced), but it ends up being a question of how much life is left in the box itself ; sometimes it's a viable repair to fix one solenoid, just to get another 100k of road miles out of it before it needs first overhaul...other times the box is that old/worn, you're as well doing first overhaul and replacing the solenoids and starting fresh... What Nissan did here with the 5-speed, was relocate the EPC solenoid to the lower valvebody (next to the TC lockup solenoid), and stuck the direct-drive clutch solenoid (for the extra gear) where the EPC solenoid used to be on the 4-speed....I can only imagine they did this for serviceability ; the PWM solenoids are most likely to fail, and it's a doddle to drop the pan and change these out (as opposed to dropping the valvebody itself to get at a top mounted EPC)... ...also keep in mind, that some BMW 3/5 series & Mazda (and maybe some Ford/Mazda rebadges, not sure), also used the RE5R01A box under a different name/part number...not saying parts availability is any better, but sometimes it helps to know this when it comes to NOS floating about in the EU.... HTH  
    • FWIW, air jacks are actually pretty light and simple to add, they are just 4 hydraulic cylinders (often at the main cage A and C pillar points) and an externally accessible airline  - they make quick work a breeze
    • Maximum Attack has entered the chat
×
×
  • Create New...