Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

T67 ebay version is a 25G on a L2 turbine. 25G compressor is good enough for 430rwkws while the L2 turbine is good for 370rwkws. In combination the maximum I'm seeing was about 370rwkws on 23psi, factory cams. they don't last long at that boost level either. Commonly seen Greddy T67 consists of 25G with TD06H turbine is fine for both longevity and power making, but it does cost responds.

In addition, we build some alternatives based on the 10cm L2 turbines that makes the same power as the L2 based 25Gs, that are more responsive, last longer at similar cost. Check out SL20.5 and SLSS2 on Rb25det dyno section.

well ive run into a bit of drama with a noise, not sure if the cams have caused it or bottom end, but apparently bottom end knocks dont go away once warm like this does. plus my vct gear is on its last legs.

but yes still going strong when i do drive it.

Edited by methz

I had a Kando T67 with a TD06L2 exhaust wheel in 10cm. It made 368rwkws on 24psi. First one lasted 4 month and the replacement lasted 3 month. They no longer reply to my emails now. Photo of the last one:

front.jpg

inhousing.jpg

rear.jpg

Edited by petero'nell

T67 ebay version is a 25G on a L2 turbine. 25G compressor is good enough for 430rwkws while the L2 turbine is good for 370rwkws. In combination the maximum I'm seeing was about 370rwkws on 23psi, factory cams. they don't last long at that boost level either. Commonly seen Greddy T67 consists of 25G with TD06H turbine is fine for both longevity and power making, but it does cost responds.

In addition, we build some alternatives based on the 10cm L2 turbines that makes the same power as the L2 based 25Gs, that are more responsive, last longer at similar cost. Check out SL20.5 and SLSS2 on Rb25det dyno section.

Greddy differentiate their T67-25G and TD06H-25G for that reason. A TD06H-25G is actually bigger than a T67 in Greddy speak. They share the same compressor side but on the hot side the T67 uses the smaller L2 turbine.

If you have seen a Greddy turbo with a 25G compressor and the TD06H turbine then it is a TD06H-25G...not a T67-25G or what is referred to commonly as the T67.

Cant speak to the reliability of Kando turbos but it does seem possible that the later ones are a little more grenade like than the earlier ones and definitely Trust turbos. Trust turbos just keep on keeping on. Though these days with E85 and boost over 25psi I do wonder whether the would be as happy in the 25-30psi range as they were in the 20-25psi range

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 8 months later...
  • 1 year later...
On ‎9‎/‎12‎/‎2014 at 0:36 PM, hypergear said:

T67 ebay version is a 25G on a L2 turbine. 25G compressor is good enough for 430rwkws while the L2 turbine is good for 370rwkws. In combination the maximum I'm seeing was about 370rwkws on 23psi, factory cams. they don't last long at that boost level either. Commonly seen Greddy T67 consists of 25G with TD06H turbine is fine for both longevity and power making, but it does cost responds.

In addition, we build some alternatives based on the 10cm L2 turbines that makes the same power as the L2 based 25Gs, that are more responsive, last longer at similar cost. Check out SL20.5 and SLSS2 on Rb25det dyno section.

Is there quite a few Kando T67s that have failed at around 23psi on a 25?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
×
×
  • Create New...