Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi there, I recently finished rebuilding my rb26. I am looking for insight into how much I can advance my ignition map with my recent swap to eflex fuel.

Currently sitting at 17.5psi and 14* this made 305rwkw which to me seems like there is much more to be made.

If anybody has been road tuning I'd love to see what your maps look like. I'm just looking to fiddle myself now that I have the AFRs correct.

I am new to RBs but 14degrees@18psi seems mild to me. Would 22psi be more likely to see around the 14degree mark? Provided I have reasonable knock levels.

Setup inc

Built rb26 8.5:1

Hks 264s

Hks 2540s

33gtr Fmic

Full 3inch exhaust. (3.5inch ready to go on)

Hard pipes

+all supporting fuel sys for eflex. (Haltech plat pro reads 61% ethanol content.

Any ign maps for 98 or e85 would be great if you are happy to share.

Cheers

Blake.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/452568-rb26-e-flex-ignition-vs-boost/
Share on other sites

I'm not looking to extract every last kw out of the car, just interested in seeing how my ign map compares to others with similar setups. Being told that 20degrees with 21 psi blew your ring lands and sent egts over the moon is kind of what I'm after. I was browsing the EVO e85 threads and a surprising amount of people are road tuning and sharing maps.

Obviously every engine is different but I and I'm sure others who enjoy fiddling would enjoy seeing others maps.

I understand that it isn't particularly as safe as with all the correct gear. I'm only asking to see others maps or thoughts on my timing vs boost. I'll get the ball rolling

My base map 17.5psi 14* at full load.

My xr6turbo 21psi@10degees timing.

I don't plan on blaming anyone for blowing it up haha ;)

At 8.5:1 and e85 you're unlikely to nuke anything without drastic changes

E85 brings your EGTs down a fair whack which means you can run relaxed timing without the fear of melting your turbos. So you can use boost to make power if you're not confident touching the ignition. That's what I do anyway. Keep an eye on afrs though as you increase boost

A small amount of timing and boost would be fine 9 times out of 10 in your situation

I'm starting to sound like Johnny

Yeah I am not so worried about blowing it up, I have done a bit of road tuning before, I was just curious as we know every engine is different. And the Ford 6s I have been tuning are most likely different in the amount of advance they like. Evos seem to like up to 10degrees less than the rbs according to the maps I have seen

I also set up my anti lag launch control (2step) the haltech seems pretty user friendly.

and it coughs when it's too rich...

and if it's too rich it will knock

and if it's too lean it will just misfire

and AFRs aren't that important with E85

and you can happily cruise leaner than stoich with no dramas

E85 is awesome, minus the crappy economy

I've got 14 degrees advance at 3900rpm at 1.6bar, it then slowly climbs to 16 degrees by 5100rpm and then finishes up at 19 degrees at 7500rpm

Probably could take more as my exhaust manifold started to glow on a long pull.

At 8.5:1 and e85 you're unlikely to nuke anything without drastic changes

E85 brings your EGTs down a fair whack which means you can run relaxed timing without the fear of melting your turbos. So you can use boost to make power if you're not confident touching the ignition. That's what I do anyway. Keep an eye on afrs though as you increase boost

A small amount of timing and boost would be fine 9 times out of 10 in your situation

I'm starting to sound like Johnny

hahahaha MORE BOOST :)

yes lazy, inefficient way of tuning but at least you won't grenade stuff... on 98RON it's not such a smart idea as your EGTs will go through the roof and you'll end up melting stuff on the hotside, include exhaust valves.

accurate mixture control combined with the best timing would be ideal in any situation. my rb25det runs 18degrees at 1.2bar on 98octane.

where do you want the most power to be? top end of the rpm or as early as possible?

I'm not too fussed Tbh, with the 2540s it's never going to do much under 4500rpm. My understanding is that with rpm after peak torque you increase timing gradually to make up for loss of cylinder pressure.

So with the old setup, HKS GTSS twins, it made 312awkw @21psi unknown timing. Bp98

Swapped for 2540s added e70 eflex, didn't touch ignition but added 30% fuel trim. Dumped at 17.5psi @14* 305rwkw

So what I might do is bump boost up to 21psi again, 14* and go from there. Seeing as I only have my 3inch cat back on there for now I'll cap it at 21psi and add a degree or two and see how it goes.

  • Like 1

My goal here is to enjoy fiddling with my car while learning /practicing my tuning. I'm not fussed on outright numbers, I'm just having fun, and being a test mule if anyone has any ideas.

  • Like 1

I'm not too fussed Tbh, with the 2540s it's never going to do much under 4500rpm. My understanding is that with rpm after peak torque you increase timing gradually to make up for loss of cylinder pressure.

its not for loss of cylinder pressure that you increase timing its because the time between firing events (spark) is less when rpm increases.

you want peak cylinder pressure at around 12 degrees atdc,any more or any less and you lose torque, you therefor need to ignite the mix so it burns at a rate that gives peak pressure at that angle, as revs go up, the piston moves faster so mix needs to be lit earlyer or peak pressure will occur after the desired angle, and waste power, yet you dont want to advance to much as the other side puts stupid amounts of strain on the motor and wastes energy to.
however as more load is placed on the motor, more heat is in the chamber so mix burns faster, so timing needs to decrease to keep peak pressure at the right angle, or else your firing to early and can cause damage from to much strain.

this is on a motor that isnt limited by knock,
most rb25 with big turbos and huge boost will be knock limited at some point, so wont actually be able to be at 12 degrees atdc with peak cylinder pressure as the burn is to unstable and starts pinging so in these cases peak pressure ends up being later atdc to keep things working without damage

how do you measure this?
knock ears and a dyno,
increase timing in a cell while holding steady state on the dyno and watch the torque fiqure, it will plateau and then drop, at the start of this plateau is where you want your timing to be, any more or any less and your wasting power and arnt helping the motor at all,

if when advancing the timing it starts to ping before it plateaus, thats how you know the engine is knock limited, and timing needs to be put back to stop the pinging


slight changes in engine setups, and even just slight tollerance differences between motors, is what could make one map work perfect for one persons motor, and make another persons motor need a tow truck, so be careful when playing with ignition timing without the correct tools

Edited by Scott Black

its not for loss of cylinder pressure that you increase timing its because the time between firing events (spark) is less when rpm increases.

Actually, it is both. You can't run as much advance around peak VE when the engine is knock limited, which is the short way of saying what Scott said above.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi. A little bit of an update. It maybe(hope not) looks like i would need a new tranny(it would be "maybe" a cheaper or better option anyway) So i need some info. I know i need a different propshaft(i can make custom one) LSD is not a problem cuz the engine will be still(for now) N/A RB20. So if i buy RB25DET NEO tranny...is there something else i need? I read something about push/pull type but i do not know if i need to "change" something or i can just plug n play onto my engine a go? Thanks for the advice  
    • Good morning all, Bit of a random question but figured I’d finally throw it out after wondering for a long while. Before I start, I'm hoping to do this purely out of personal preference. I think it would look better at night, and don't mind at all spending a few hours and dollars to get it done. I've copied this from a non-Skyline specific forum, so I apologize for the explanation of our headlight switch setup that we all know. Here we go: Zero lights (switch off) Parking lights (switch position 1) being a rectangular marker on the outside of the housing, my low beam being the projector in the centre (position 2), and a high beam triggered by my turn signal stalk. Most North American cars I’ve owned of this era have power to the amber corner (turning indicator) light as part of the first switch (parking lights). I’d love to have these amber corners receive power when the headlights and parking lights are on (headlight switch), yet still blink when using the turn signal which is of course a separate switch. Hopefully I’ve explained my question correctly. Is anyone aware of a way in which I might be able to achieve this? Thanks in advance
    • My heads are cathedral port! It's likely possible, but I don't want to add any extra moving parts (I know they don't move) between the heads, manifolds, etc. It will also affect how injectors/fuel rails etc sit and I don't really know if it would change how the FAST manifold goes/sits/fits. I have the LS6 steam pipes already as I have a very late LS1 block so it should be fine. I couldn't find anyone who had ever actually used one for this purpose, it seems 100% of people grind the water pump. The thermal spacers are 12mm and are half way to the cost of the newer water pump anyhow... so if it comes to that I suppose I'd rather buy a new pump. The bearing in the pump I do have is a little.. clunky, but it hasn't done that much time and I never noticed it when the car was together in the past few years, so..
    • The bushing has failed, not all that uncommon for a car of this age.  Any mechanic should be able to push in a new bushing for you, or you can probably buy the entire lower control arm, complete with bushes.
    • Could you not use "thermal" spacers to give the clearance, like the ones I used between the blower and head? That raised the manifold height by around 10-15mm Albeit the ones I used were for cathedral ports, but I assume they have similar for rectangular ports????
×
×
  • Create New...