Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I'm just wondering how much would a standard r32 two piece drive shaft (3 uni joints, 1 hanger bearing) move or shift from its normal position when not rotating compare to when under load from the engine?
I have replanted the original 20de motor to a rb25det neo, obviously an increase in power... so would this cause the drive shaft to twist or move more than usual under hard acceleration?

The reason I'm asking this question is because I'm in new zealand and to meet the legal requirements for the engine replant i have to install 2 drive shaft hoops. And it looks like the shaft is connecting the bolts inside the hoop causing a clucking sound under heavy acceleration. the shaft clears the head of the bolts by about 7mm-10mm. could the d shaft move that much?

cheers, will post photo Asap.

Shouldn't move much, but it really depends on how close the bolts on those loops are. Without photos it's a little hard to say.

So, first question. R32 RB20DE right? What's the chances that the tailshaft on those is any different at all to the one on the turbos? I would say unlikely. On that basis, I would argue against the need for tailshaft loops. Bloody tailshaft loops on a 2 piece tailshaft seems unnecessary anyway. What sort of drugs are your roadworthy people on anyway?

Second question. So you've put a 25Neo onto the front of an RB20DE gearbox? If so, expect it not to last too long. If you instead have transplanted the big turbo gearbox with the engine, then you would have had to modify the tailshaft anyway, to put the front half of an R33 or R34 turbo tailshaft onto it. If that happened, then why didn't you get the centrebearing and support checked out at the same time?

Just FYI, the only place where the 2 piece shaft can deflect at all is at the centre support. If it's shot, all you need to do is replace it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's unfortunate what Tomei USA has done to Tomei's name in general. I'm very weary of ordering parts from them now. I only order direct from a Japanse source (e.g Nengun). At least their logos are different, so you end up knowing what you have. 
    • Update Issues 5 (plus #4) - 10 After making a claim about issue #4's missing part, DeAgostini Japan sent a whole new issue #4 and it arrived about 2 weeks after that. That was back in early March. It took another 4 weeks to receive issues 5 - 13 though. This update is for issues 5 - 10. Ove the 5 issues the front left suspension and most of the engine have been completed. The quality of the castings and fit of the parts is quite good, it seems better than DeAgostini's BNR34 Skyline GT-R from the Fast & Furious 2 movie, which (to me anyway) doesn't seem to have as tight tolerances or quite as accurate castings.  Each issue has a lot of info about the 1989 - 1993 Skyline range and other Nissan models from that era, but the focus is on the BNR32 Skyline GT-R Nismo and the various racing it did in Japan, Europe (Spa 24hrs) and of course Australia. I've included some text translated with Google Lens in some photos and will add to them if there's anything worth including. 
    • If it's for a SR20, make sure it's not the American Poncams, might as well call them Poocams. Had a set in a friend's car, all scuffed up after a few track days. Like the metallurgy Tomei USA used is junk. Went back to JDM OG Tomei Poncams, no issues till now.   Tomei USA is not the real OG Tomei.   Random rant over, fk the US of A, bunch of c u n t s. 
    • Most of the industry in North America either runs on Siemens or Allen Bradley. I have two redundant S7-1500's on my desk right next to me for simulation. Siemens has been losing ground though since Stuxnet, as cybersecurity is a big thing. In my line of work that is federally regulated, you must by law have a cybersecurity management program in place and its audited and inspected every so often.  I work with Emerson PLC's daily (RX3i's) and have done large biogas/refinery projects with their DCS's. Their PLC's are somewhat OK minus the way they do PLC redundancy (You have to download on both PLC's separately every time you make a change )  As for their DCS's... you'll be limited financially first before anything else stops you. Costs are exorbiant at roughly 10x what it would cost you to do with any other system (e.g AB PAC).  1990's, those suckers are brand new haha! Kraft-Heinz (An old client when I use to work for an ESP) still runs Siemens TI505 PLC's from the mid 80's. Ohh how I don't miss working with those... you could only do a certain number of online downloads until it's "Change" buffer would be full and you would then need to go offline to do a full download. There was no warning of when this was coming up and it generally would happen when you would go in at 2am to make changes before production -_-.     
×
×
  • Create New...