Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

sweet, by square i mean the same front to back but yeah im not looking for stanced out stretch or muffin top either :P i actually dont mind a slightly stretched tire on looks but its simply not needed for the offset of +20 so it wont be done.

imo.. well in my mind, 265 fronts would tram-track a bit, probably not an issue really.

its a shame they dont make +12 or similar in the xxr wheels, wouldn't mind pushing them out to the guard edge a but further but hey, beggers cant be choosers, their a cheap wheel which actually look half decent.

my current wheels are 17x9+22 and sit like this ...
the new specs at 265 are perfect (chears ;) ) to keep the tire size spot on.
would consider running spacers for looks but not for a daily, not JUST for looks, well not on a daily basis anyway.

IMG_4143_zpswavos6cj.jpg
wheels_zpsyj3hh02k.jpg

Edited by GH05T

Are your gaurds still stock? If so i would leave them. Forget the stance fad or whatever. Gtr gaurds are big enough to throw a decent tyre under there.

Im sure you would have trouble breaking traction on good tyres and a proper wheel alignment. Fuse in of course!

loved the detail/work that went into your old 31 on the 31forums etc...

the 32gtr looks clean, loving it currently, bride looks at home in the interior,,, selling the gtr seats? #cawwwwwcawwwww #thatsstevenseagulltoyou haahhahahahaha.
In the way of the wheels as much as flush/mexistance/ultrataco looks cool etc, personally i think wheels/fitment as above is good size, without being too "stanced" its rad but funtional... age old saying, if it aint f**ked, dont fix it.​

​definitely going to keep an eye on the future progress regardless.
unless you ruin it then ill bomb you isis styles. boom here comes dat boom here comes dat yall don't really want it now... :P

fkin lol.

bride seat i moved on for tip top condition gtr seats, still havnt done the back seat but im not fussed cos it seems to carry allot of car parts, wheels and shit and i dont care if it gets marked up.

  • 2 weeks later...

fitting up now.
very happy with how they fit with the guards.

20151020_104811_zpsm6zumrtq.jpg
20151020_110705_zpsxval0z8m.jpg

as its a daily, i have gone for the cheaper goodrides as suggested.
good looking tire, will see how they fair.
20151020_103710_zpsyvyvcbok.jpg

will get good photos soon ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...