Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys, does anyone have rough figures of what the follow cars with the following power can do in a quarter mile?(power = @ wheels)

gsts vs gtr @ 200kw, 250kw, 300kw, 350kw, 400kw

ie: 200kwgtst = 13s

200kw GTR = 12.4s

yes of course every car will be different, but just rough estimates of each will do

would be interested in users posting their 1/4 time and kw@wheels(figures that are close to 200-400kw's@wheel)

also state tires used please

just wanna see how much 4wd is better:P

heheheh

cheers

AssM@N

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/45322-kwrw-kw4wd-scaling/
Share on other sites

I've seen R33 GTST's in Sydney with exhaust, fmic, power fc run 12.9-13.9 and I've also seen GTR's with the same mods run 12.4-13.4 so I'm thinking at best 5 tenths different

i assume this time gap gets wider as the power increases.........

would like to see direct comparisons of kw ratings as stated in main post

that doesn't show me much

it only tells me time

not engine kw or what wheel drive

read the main post of what i want.... to compare rw and 4w

The list I linked you to ( http://skylines.pnc.com.au/drags.html ) actually tells you the model of Skyline (ie R32 GT-R, R33 GTS25t etc.) so if you know your Skylines you'll be able to figure out if it's RWD or AWD. AFAIK not one of the entries on that list uses RWD only if they have AWD and nor do any of the RWD guys have AWD transplants. If your not sure what model Skyline came with AWD then do a search.

As for rw/awkw levels, most of the entries on the list have this info in there sig's or listed under their profiles somewhere - try a search and see how you go. All the info your seeking is already on this forum in one way or another. It may take a bit of a search but you'll find it. Have fun :cheers:

You can get a 2WD to hook up pretty well, but at least it won't have the driveline losses of a 4WD at the high end of the track. Or weight.

Edit: and there's no way that "400rwkw" car has that much power. If it did it would have run alot more MPH...

Why would you assume that, do you think the only cars that are quick down the 1/4 mile are AWD?

because the more power u have, the more tranction probs u are gonna have........

never said ONLY AWD is fast;) just trying to find the disadvantaged time of traction loss or traction gained from AWD

as u stated: 12-13s on gtst is disadvantaged about 0.5s

The list I linked you to ( http://skylines.pnc.com.au/drags.html ) actually tells you the model of Skyline (ie R32 GT-R, R33 GTS25t etc.) so if you know your Skylines you'll be able to figure out if it's RWD or AWD. AFAIK not one of the entries on that list uses RWD only if they have AWD and nor do any of the RWD guys have AWD transplants.  If your not sure what model Skyline came with AWD then do a search.    

As for rw/awkw levels, most of the entries on the list have this info in there sig's or listed under their profiles somewhere - try a search and see how you go. All the info your seeking is already on this forum in one way or another. It may take a bit of a search but you'll find it. Have fun :(

oh didn't click on the names, lol

from what im seeing so far

~300kw@rw will get u abt 12s on the quarter

but 2rismo has 200kw and still got ~12, maybe good launch + tires, etc

so ugh.......

Edit: and there's no way that "400rwkw" car has that much power. If it did it would have run alot more MPH...

The USA dynos factor a much lower drivetrain loss than our Aussie dynos. As a rough example (ie using totally bogus figures) ...

Australia: 250fwhp ='s 170rwhp - results in a 14.5 @ 100mph 1/4

USA: 250fwhp ='s 220rwhp - results in a 14.5 @ 100mph 1/4

It doesn't matter as long as your comparing apples to apples (ie US dyno figure vs other US dyno fig's). Compare Aussie fig's and US fig's and it won't add up.

My car makes ~470rwhp on a US dyno, woo hoo! :cheers:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...