Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

That's certainly surprising, is that including the swap to external gate?

Currently deciding if I should bother with 6boob and gate for 280kw :/

hypergear has done the tests him self, larger ID exhaust manifold pipe will lead to more lag but better top end power, but not a huge amount mind you

hypergear has done the tests him self, larger ID exhaust manifold pipe will lead to more lag but better top end power, but not a huge amount mind you

Just had a read, the difference in response is only a couple of hundred rpm. Doesn't seem to be worth the $1000++ at 300kw power level for an extra 10-20kw on top of the stock mani.

Edited by owen1r

Cool thread, kinda along the lines of what I'm doing - subscribed and will share my results along the way

Hoping for a close to stock response 230-240kw, which will be exactly what I'm after

My setup will be -

HKS 2535 turbo, hoping to run around 18psi (have turbo but not installed yet)

Split dump pipe - installed on stock turbo at the moment, quite a decent length split section

Nistune - installed

Autobahn88 intake pipe - installed

Injector wise, im either going to use a set of R35 GTR injectors, from what I've been able to work out they are 560cc and direct drop in, or a set of larger injectors if I wanted to go E85

I'm guessing the stock AFM will need to be upgraded to a Z32 or R35 GTR unit

Look forward to seeing the OP's results

  • Like 1

Larger manifold/runners would reduce exhaust velocity/pressure. Good for high hp, not so much for response.

I'm now starting to consider the HyperGear 21U highflow as an option. I had the OP6 highflow previously and it was lacking slightly in response. Maybe the 21U will be a sweet middle ground.

This is 100% correct the OP6 highflow will cause a fair bit of lag, I myself just got a 21U highflow and am taking out my OP6 highflow as i want response. You will only lose about 10rwkw of top end power. Another member on here helped me make my mind up he said he had owned a skyline with a OP6 highflow and one with a 21U, on a dyno the OP6 made more power but on the street the 21U felt alot faster. Will have more info once I get mine installed and retuned :)

Edited by DoseVader
  • Like 1

If you use the JJR dump, it might need some work with a die grinder to match the turbo, there is a few threads on grinding to suit.

Or do what I did and cut the lower half away and open it up.

As purchased

IMG_0013_zpsb44ba558.jpg

Modified

IMG_0065_zpsafhuqu6f.jpg

Unmodified, there was a 10mm step at the bottom of the flange, die ground as much as I could but still wasnt happy, so started cutting! lol

I have a hypergear op6 highflow, and the highflow machining eats into the flange area, possibly more than a 21u highflow

  • Like 1

Cool, I'm guessing I'll need to mod mine a touch to suit the 2535

Can anyone confirm is 230kw is possible using stock Neo injectors and air flow meter?

Pretty sure both max out at around 220-230rwkw

Yeah, you'll likely be over the top of both by the time you get to 220rwkW. Not wise to try to run past the max, so you're kind of forced to upgrade. Sucks having to upgrade for +10rwkW, so that's probably why most prefer to aim for 240+.

Yeah figured as much, I'll see how it goes

This is 100% correct the OP6 highflow will cause a fair bit of lag, I myself just got a 21U highflow and am taking out my OP6 highflow as i want response. You will only lose about 10rwkw of top end power. Another member on here helped me make my mind up he said he had owned a skyline with a OP6 highflow and one with a 21U, on a dyno the OP6 made more power but on the street the 21U felt alot faster. Will have more info once I get mine installed and retuned :)

Good feedback. ~500rpm response difference on a dyno graph doesn't look like much, but I think real-world driving response will be greatly improved.

Will be taking my 21U to HyperGear in the coming weeks, and will post back to back results compared to the OP6 unit.

Injector wise, im either going to use a set of R35 GTR injectors, from what I've been able to work out they are 560cc and direct drop in, or a set of larger injectors if I wanted to go E85

560cc should be able to support 240rwkw on e85.

560cc should be able to support 240rwkw on e85.

Yeah, however I'm not sure if the VR38 injectors would cope well with E85 overtime?

It's a bit of a dilemma really!

Nistune have the flex fuel upgrade also, so I think for now I'll stick with the stock stuff and see what they can do, then do the injectors and the Nistune flex fuel setup in one hit and have it tuned for 98 and E85

Would cams be good upgrade for response, considering price and in a similar power range (240-270 killerwasps)

Stock cams are the best for that, longer duration cams will shift the power/torque towards the higher end of the RPM range.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 馃槂
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
    • You talking about the ones in the photo above? I guess that could make sense. Fixed (but flexible) line from the point up above down to the hubcap thingo, with a rotating air seal thingo. Then fixed (but also still likely flexible) line from the "other side" of the transfer in the hub cap thingo up to the valve stem on the rim. A horrible cludge, but something that could be done. I'd bet on the Unimog version being fed through from the back, as part of the axle assembly, without the need for the vulnerable lines out to the sides. It's amazing what you can do when you have an idea that is not quite impossible. Nearly impossible, but not quite.
  • Create New...