Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This is a good little basic article to explain the effects of diff gearing. From WALLACE RACING. http://www.wallaceracing.com/reargear.htm

Rear End Gear Selection

As most Pontiac fans realize, changing rear gear ratios can yield a tremendous performance increase. Three questions sometimes arise when considering a change in rear end ratio: How will the change affect top speed?, How will the change affect fuel economy?, and How will the change affect exhaust emissions?

A change in rear gear ratio can be one of the most satisfying modifications you can make on your Pontiac, and it can be one of the most cost effective. For instance, changing from a 2.41:1 ratio to a 3.73:1 ratio will provide a rear wheel torque increase of 55%.

Figure I below is a chart of rear wheel torque increases; to find the torque increase for a proposed gear ratio change, find your present ratio in the left column and move across to the column that is headed by the proposed ratio, the percentage shown is the torque increase (negative percentages are torque decreases).

Providing you can get it to the ground (have sufficient traction) the 55% torque increase should substantially improve your quarter mile E.T. and push you back in the seat a lot harder! On the street,the drivability and responsiveness will be greatly improved.

There are some interesting points to ponder in a rear gear change. For instance, a 1978 Firebird with -the standard 400 (non T/A 6.6) engine originally equipped with 2.41:1 gears. With this combination the torque peak occurs at about 52 mph and the horsepower peak occurs at about 118 mph. The same gear with 3.73:1 gears reaches the torque peak at about 34 mph and the horsepower peaks at about 76 mph. The 3.73 gears convert this car from a "Freeway Cruiser" into a "Surface Street Stomper" that would have tremendous response at around town speeds and would probably get the best fuel economy at city speeds of 30-40 mph.

Now, consider a 1978 Firebird with the T/A 6.6 engine. When using 2.41:1 rear gears the torque occurs at about 92 mph and the horsepower peak occurs at about 131 mph - With 3.73:1 gears, T/A 6.6 car reaches the torque peak at about 59 mph and the horsepower peaks at about 85 mph

The 3.73:1 gears convert the T/A 6.6 car from a "Freeway Flyer" into a good highway or multipurpose car.
On both examples above the cars and gears considered were identical, the only difference was the engine, yet the peaks and most practical uses for each car varied greatly. The point of these examples is that a gear ratio that is perfect for one car could be a disaster in another car aiming for a similar performance goal, so you must consider the engine combination carefully when choosing the rear gear ratio. Another point that became obvious in the first example, is that the non-T/A 6.6 400 is woefully undercammed for high performance use. As you can see from the road horsepower graph (figure 2) below, the maximum vehicle speed is influenced by the rear gear ratio. The graph shows increasing horsepower and torque on the vertical axis and increasing vehicle speed on the horizontal axis. NOTE: All curves shown in this article are arbitrary but representative of actual relationships.
gear2c.jpg
You see five curves on the graph, two torque at rear wheel curves (for 2.41:1 and 3.73:1 ratios), two horsepower at rear wheel curves (for 2.41:1 and 3.73:1 ratios), and one horsepower required to maintain road speed curve. The two rear wheel torque curves show that increasing the gear ratio both causes the torque peak to occur at a lower road speed and increases the peak torque value. This is the primary explanation for the performance increase. The two rear wheel horsepower curves show that increasing the gear ratio causes the horsepower peak to occur at a lower road speed but the peak horsepower value is the same. The single "horsepower required" curve indicates the amount of horsepower required to maintain vehicle speed. The respective maximum vehicle speeds are indicated where the rear wheel horsepower curves intersect the "horsepower required" curve. Taken as a whole, the graph shows that a torque increase of 55% can be had while reducing maximum vehicle speed by only 8 mph,only a 6 % loss.

Edited by XGTRX

Because the torque at the wheels is higher at a particular rev point. So even though the engine characteristics have not changed directly the torque at the wheels have so therefore you will come on boost at a lower speed. As a result on a dyno you will see the torque curve plotted against wheel speed shifted to the left and even though the torque against rpm will be similar, it will be seen to ramp quicker against time because of the torque multiplication factor of the diff. But the torque against wheel speed and rate of acceleration is where it is at and that's what matters really.

Edited by XGTRX

Shit, based off that I'll go find some 6:1 diff gears and put it in the GTR. I forgot that it doesn't matter at what point in the rev range it comes on boost.

Apparently boost vs road speed is all that matters. Can't wait to shift at 25km/h after 0.3 seconds of boost

  • Like 1

Shit, based off that I'll go find some 6:1 diff gears and put it in the GTR. I forgot that it doesn't matter at what point in the rev range it comes on boost.

Apparently boost vs road speed is all that matters. Can't wait to shift at 25km/h after 0.3 seconds of boost

I think 5.2:1 is availble for the GTR diffs :yes:

Nah sorry mate the theory is correct and I have also seen it first hand. And on the road they are a lot different. Nothing to do with dyno plot either it's just used to illustrate torque to wheel speed difference. Rate of acceleration is night and day when comparing to standard gears. Obviously your experience is exactly the opposite to what many others have experienced, don't know how though.

Edited by XGTRX

Because the torque at the wheels is higher at a particular rev point. So even though the engine characteristics have not changed directly the torque at the wheels have so therefore you will come on boost at a lower speed. As a result on a dyno you will see the torque curve plotted against wheel speed shifted to the left and even though the torque against rpm will be similar, it will be seen to ramp quicker against time because of the torque multiplication factor of the diff. But the torque against wheel speed and rate of acceleration is where it is at and that's what matters really.

so what you're saying is boost doesn't come on at an earlier RPM and therefore lag has not been reduced?

Road speed yes it happens earlier including gear changes but engine speed (rpm) all happens exactly the same, hence it being an illusion of response but not a gain in actual response

Shit, based off that I'll go find some 6:1 diff gears and put it in the GTR. I forgot that it doesn't matter at what point in the rev range it comes on boost.

Apparently boost vs road speed is all that matters. Can't wait to shift at 25km/h after 0.3 seconds of boost

Put some GT12s on it while your at it. :P

I have seen multiple videos and talked to some people and even the the extra shift (r34 getrag) and R32 ran a 10 over old 11 second passes.

So I think that equals real world speed and response. I understand that the tops speed is slightly down (not buy much) and engine RPM at 110km is about 300rpm (odd) more. Also talked to someone that said even with his big HKS 2530's (505kw atw's) he said the 6spd conversion with 4.11 ratios has been one of the best modifications to real world speed.

I know boost doesn't come on earlier in RPM but have heard good things. Enough for me to take it into serious consideration later in the year.

Let me run a 1/4 in the coming summer season and then when 3rd goes run it again with the getrag haha.

I have seen multiple videos and talked to some people and even the the extra shift (r34 getrag) and R32 ran a 10 over old 11 second passes.

Watch the video again, the Motive DVD GTR car actually traps at a slower speed (so acceleration is actually worse with the 6 speed). The only reason it runs a 10 is because it gets off the line better...

Seat of pants feel vs actual performance usually is significantly different

  • Like 2

so his trap speed was less but time was better with the extra shift. Wonder how much softening the suspension helped.

im pretty interested in this convo. I can see both points been a fine line and valid.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As GTS mentioned, it takes a bit of faffing, some fiddling and a little modifying.  With the strainers, you can buy different styles. Some sit flat on the pump, some angle down.  Here are some photos of mine, ignore the ugly welds lol. 
    • The smart thing is to actually locate the pump at the right point down the hanger, so that the strainer can stay sticking out at a right angle, but near the bottom. This is the perpetual hassle with retrofitting any different pump to the factory hanger. Some just go where you need it to, some need fiddling and faffing, and modifying of stuff.
    • Some updates. After a lot of praying and some inspecting of crank threads, we've found that they were both kinda munted but nothing seemed terminal. The other option was drilling and helicoiling the crank. That is obviously the last option so we decided to at least try to get a OEM GM bolt in to GM Specs. So after honing/linishing the balancer from it's .002" interference fit to a .0018" to .0015" to .0013" it eventually slotted on to the crank. ATI state the interference is nominally 0.0007-0.0009... so it's still snugger than ATI reckon and explains the issues we had to fit the thing to begin with. New GM bolt went in at 37 ft/lb then torqued 140 degrees after which was EXTREMELY   but it tightened up to 140 degrees and it was a lot of force. So all things considered, the balancer is secured to the exact specs that GM want with the OEM Stretch bolt, (that ATI say you can use..) and the balancer itself is seated and snug AF. So WOO. Engine is now back in the car with lots of swearing. Bellhousing bolts done up, driver side manifold is on, AC Compressor and hard lines are back on the car. Next step will be to connect various engine bits/wiring/intake/radiator etc. Then oil and coolant and ... test start it? And of course, looking into this issue... which actually doesn't look so bad - It looks like it can be twisted back into shape with a set of multigrips. Anyone wanna buy my bonnet? Boy it looks good over there and sunk cost sucks.
    • Also this may be a stupid question, but how would you recommend getting the strainer on a downwards angle ? as they tend to obviously clip to the bottom of the pump which usually sits level 🥴
×
×
  • Create New...